| b12a3311 | 04-Oct-2023 |
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> |
kunit: Reset suite counter right before running tests
[ Upstream commit 2e3c94aed51eabbe9c1c0ee515371ea5441c2fa7 ]
Today we reset the suite counter as part of the suite cleanup,
called from the mod
kunit: Reset suite counter right before running tests
[ Upstream commit 2e3c94aed51eabbe9c1c0ee515371ea5441c2fa7 ]
Today we reset the suite counter as part of the suite cleanup,
called from the module exit callback, but it might not work that
well as one can try to collect results without unloading a previous
test (either unintentionally or due to dependencies).
For easy reproduction try to load the kunit-test.ko and then
collect and parse results from the kunit-example-test.ko load.
Parser will complain about mismatch of expected test number:
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] 1..1
[ ] # example: initializing suite
[ ] KTAP version 1
[ ] # Subtest: example
..
[ ] # example: pass:5 fail:0 skip:4 total:9
[ ] # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 skip:6 total:12
[ ] ok 7 example
[ ] [ERROR] Test: example: Expected test number 1 but found 7
[ ] ===================== [PASSED] example =====================
[ ] ============================================================
[ ] Testing complete. Ran 12 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 6, errors: 1
Since we are now printing suite test plan on every module load,
right before running suite tests, we should make sure that suite
counter will also start from 1. Easiest solution seems to be move
counter reset to the __kunit_test_suites_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| a2431a39 | 27-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test
[ Upstream commit 8040345fdae4cb256c5d981f91ae0f22bea8adcc ]
When CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y, making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y and
CONFIG_DEBU
kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test
[ Upstream commit 8040345fdae4cb256c5d981f91ae0f22bea8adcc ]
When CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y, making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y and
CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected.
If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite
and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed.
So as Rae suggested, to avoid the suite set never be freed when
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() fails and exits after kunit_filter_suites() succeeds,
update kfree_at_end() func to free_suite_set_at_end() to use
kunit_free_suite_set() to free them as kunit_module_exit() and
kunit_run_all_tests() do it. As the second arg got of
free_suite_set_at_end() is a local variable, copy it for free to avoid
wild-memory-access. After applying this patch, the following memory leak
is never detected.
unreferenced object 0xffff8881001de400 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817db753>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150
[<ffffffff817bd242>] kmemdup+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff829e961d>] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829eb69f>] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd388 (size 192):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 80 cd 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817dbad2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150
[<ffffffff829e9651>] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829eb69f>] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff888100da8400 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817db753>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150
[<ffffffff817bd242>] kmemdup+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff829e961d>] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829eb13f>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff888105117878 (size 96):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff a0 ac 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817dbad2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150
[<ffffffff829e9651>] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829eb13f>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff888102c31c00 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
6e 6f 72 6d 61 6c 5f 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 normal_suite....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817db753>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150
[<ffffffff817bd242>] kmemdup+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff829ecf17>] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860
[<ffffffff829e99ff>] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829ea975>] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd250 (size 192):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 00 a9 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817dbad2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150
[<ffffffff829ecfc1>] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860
[<ffffffff829e99ff>] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829ea975>] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff888104f4e400 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite...........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817db753>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150
[<ffffffff817bd242>] kmemdup+0x22/0x50
[<ffffffff829ecf17>] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860
[<ffffffff829e99ff>] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829e9fc3>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cc620 (size 192):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff c0 a8 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|.....
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<ffffffff817dbad2>] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150
[<ffffffff829ecfc1>] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860
[<ffffffff829e99ff>] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0
[<ffffffff829e9fc3>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0
[<ffffffff829e802a>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90
[<ffffffff81236fc6>] kthread+0x2b6/0x380
[<ffffffff81096afd>] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70
[<ffffffff81003511>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites")
Fixes: 76066f93f1df ("kunit: add tests for filtering attributes")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309142251.uJ8saAZv-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270433.wGmFRGjd-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 71edfc95 | 27-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
[ Upstream commit 24de14c98b37ea40a7e493dfd0d93b400b6efbca ]
If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not
in the
kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
[ Upstream commit 24de14c98b37ea40a7e493dfd0d93b400b6efbca ]
If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not
in the first iteration, the filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases
allocated in the last kunit_filter_attr_tests() in last inner for loop
is leaked.
So add a new free_filtered_suite err label and free the filtered_suite
and filtered_suite->test_cases so far. And change kmalloc_array of copy
to kcalloc to Clear the copy to make the kfree safe.
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 421058c7 | 27-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites()
[ Upstream commit e44679515a7b803cf0143dc9de3d2ecbe907f939 ]
If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not
in
kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites()
[ Upstream commit e44679515a7b803cf0143dc9de3d2ecbe907f939 ]
If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not
in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free
the original copy's backup copy_start.
Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
| 9076bc47 | 03-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
If both filter_glob and filters are not NULL, and kunit_parse_glob_filter()
succeed, but kcalloc parsed_filters fails, the suite_glob and tes
kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
If both filter_glob and filters are not NULL, and kunit_parse_glob_filter()
succeed, but kcalloc parsed_filters fails, the suite_glob and test_glob of
parsed kzalloc in kunit_parse_glob_filter() will be leaked.
As Rae suggested, assign -ENOMEM to *err to correctly free copy and goto
free_parsed_glob to free the suite/test_glob of parsed.
Fixes: 1c9fd080dffe ("kunit: fix uninitialized variables bug in attributes filtering")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 2b56a4b7 | 03-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in kunit_parse_glob_filter()
Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, if kzalloc fails
in kunit_parse_glob_filter(), strcpy() or strncpy() to NULL will
ca
kunit: Fix possible null-ptr-deref in kunit_parse_glob_filter()
Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, if kzalloc fails
in kunit_parse_glob_filter(), strcpy() or strncpy() to NULL will
cause below null-ptr-deref bug. So check NULL for kzalloc() and
return int instead of void for kunit_parse_glob_filter().
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address dfff800000000000
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000005
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
[dfff800000000000] address between user and kernel address ranges
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: kunit_example_test cfg80211 rfkill 8021q garp mrp stp llc ipv6 [last unloaded: kunit_example_test]
CPU: 4 PID: 6047 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W N 6.5.0-next-20230829+ #141
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : strncpy+0x58/0xc0
lr : kunit_filter_suites+0x15c/0xa84
sp : ffff800082a17420
x29: ffff800082a17420 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000004
x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffffa847e40a5320 x24: 0000000000000001
x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000001 x21: dfff800000000000
x20: 000000000000002a x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 00000000750b3b54
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000000
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 34393178302f3039 x12: ffff7508fcea4ec1
x11: 1ffff508fcea4ec0 x10: ffff7508fcea4ec0 x9 : dfff800000000000
x8 : ffff6051b1a7f86a x7 : ffff800082a17270 x6 : 0000000000000002
x5 : 0000000000000098 x4 : ffff028d9817b250 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffffa847e40a5320 x0 : 0000000000000000
Call trace:
strncpy+0x58/0xc0
kunit_filter_suites+0x15c/0xa84
kunit_module_notify+0x1b0/0x3ac
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xc4/0x128
do_init_module+0x250/0x594
load_module+0x37b0/0x44b4
init_module_from_file+0xd4/0x128
idempotent_init_module+0x2c8/0x524
__arm64_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x100
invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c
do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c
el0_svc+0x38/0x78
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
Code: 5400028a d343fe63 12000a62 39400034 (38f56863)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: 0x284761400000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xfffffd7380000000
CPU features: 0x88000203,3c020000,1000421b
Memory Limit: none
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 4b00920d | 03-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix the wrong err path and add goto labels in kunit_filter_suites()
Take the last kfree(parsed_filters) and add it to be the first. Take
the first kfree(copy) and add it to be the last. The B
kunit: Fix the wrong err path and add goto labels in kunit_filter_suites()
Take the last kfree(parsed_filters) and add it to be the first. Take
the first kfree(copy) and add it to be the last. The Best practice is to
return these errors reversely.
And as David suggested, add several labels which target only the things
which actually have been allocated so far.
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Suggested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 2810c1e9 | 03-Sep-2023 |
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()
Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, if kstrdup()
fails in mod_sysfs_setup() in load_module(), the mod->state will
switch fro
kunit: Fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_free_suite_set()
Inject fault while probing kunit-example-test.ko, if kstrdup()
fails in mod_sysfs_setup() in load_module(), the mod->state will
switch from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_GOING instead of
from MODULE_STATE_LIVE to MODULE_STATE_GOING, so only
kunit_module_exit() will be called without kunit_module_init(), and
the mod->kunit_suites is no set correctly and the free in
kunit_free_suite_set() will cause below wild-memory-access bug.
The mod->state state machine when load_module() succeeds:
MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED ---> MODULE_STATE_COMING ---> MODULE_STATE_LIVE
^ |
| | delete_module
+---------------- MODULE_STATE_GOING <---------+
The mod->state state machine when load_module() fails at
mod_sysfs_setup():
MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED ---> MODULE_STATE_COMING ---> MODULE_STATE_GOING
^ |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------+
Call kunit_module_init() at MODULE_STATE_COMING state to fix the issue
because MODULE_STATE_LIVE is transformed from it.
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffff341e942a88
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x0003f9a0f4a15440-0x0003f9a0f4a15447]
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000004
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000
CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000441ea000
[ffffff341e942a88] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: kunit_example_test(-) cfg80211 rfkill 8021q garp mrp stp llc ipv6 [last unloaded: kunit_example_test]
CPU: 3 PID: 2035 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W N 6.5.0-next-20230828+ #136
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : kfree+0x2c/0x70
lr : kunit_free_suite_set+0xcc/0x13c
sp : ffff8000829b75b0
x29: ffff8000829b75b0 x28: ffff8000829b7b90 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: dfff800000000000 x25: ffffcd07c82a7280 x24: ffffcd07a50ab300
x23: ffffcd07a50ab2e8 x22: 1ffff00010536ec0 x21: dfff800000000000
x20: ffffcd07a50ab2f0 x19: ffffcd07a50ab2f0 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffffcd07c24b6764
x14: ffffcd07c24b63c0 x13: ffffcd07c4cebb94 x12: ffff700010536ec7
x11: 1ffff00010536ec6 x10: ffff700010536ec6 x9 : dfff800000000000
x8 : 00008fffefac913a x7 : 0000000041b58ab3 x6 : 0000000000000000
x5 : 1ffff00010536ec5 x4 : ffff8000829b7628 x3 : dfff800000000000
x2 : ffffff341e942a80 x1 : ffffcd07a50aa000 x0 : fffffc0000000000
Call trace:
kfree+0x2c/0x70
kunit_free_suite_set+0xcc/0x13c
kunit_module_notify+0xd8/0x360
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0xc4/0x128
load_module+0x382c/0x44a4
init_module_from_file+0xd4/0x128
idempotent_init_module+0x2c8/0x524
__arm64_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x100
invoke_syscall+0x6c/0x258
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x160/0x22c
do_el0_svc+0x44/0x5c
el0_svc+0x38/0x78
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x13c/0x158
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
Code: aa0003e1 b25657e0 d34cfc42 8b021802 (f9400440)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
Kernel Offset: 0x4d0742200000 from 0xffff800080000000
PHYS_OFFSET: 0xffffee43c0000000
CPU features: 0x88000203,3c020000,1000421b
Memory Limit: none
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: 3d6e44623841 ("kunit: unify module and builtin suite definitions")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| dce19a3f | 29-Aug-2023 |
David Gow <davidgow@google.com> |
kunit: test: Make filter strings in executor_test writable
KUnit's attribute filtering feature needs the filter strings passed in
to be writable, as it modifies them in-place during parsing. This wo
kunit: test: Make filter strings in executor_test writable
KUnit's attribute filtering feature needs the filter strings passed in
to be writable, as it modifies them in-place during parsing. This works
for the filters passed on the kernel command line, but the string
literals used in the executor tests are at least theoretically read-only
(though they work on x86_64 for some reason). s390 wasn't fooled, and
crashed when these tests were run.
Use a 'char[]' instead, (and make an explicit variable for the current
filter in parse_filter_attr_test), which will store the string in a
writable segment.
Fixes: 76066f93f1df ("kunit: add tests for filtering attributes")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/55950256-c00a-4d21-a2c0-cf9f0e5b8a9a@roeck-us.net/
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 25e324bc | 17-Aug-2023 |
Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> |
kunit: fix struct kunit_attr header
Add parameter descriptions to struct kunit_attr header for the
parameters attr_default and print.
Fixes: 39e92cb1e4a1 ("kunit: Add test attributes API structure"
kunit: fix struct kunit_attr header
Add parameter descriptions to struct kunit_attr header for the
parameters attr_default and print.
Fixes: 39e92cb1e4a1 ("kunit: Add test attributes API structure")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308180127.VD7YRPGa-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| b67abaad | 07-Aug-2023 |
Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> |
kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering
External tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), support execution of
individual selftests provided by kernel modules. That could be also
applicabl
kunit: Allow kunit test modules to use test filtering
External tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), support execution of
individual selftests provided by kernel modules. That could be also
applicable to kunit test modules if they provided test filtering. But
test filtering is now possible only when kunit code is built into the
kernel. Moreover, a filter can be specified only at boot time, then
reboot is required each time a different filter is needed.
Build the test filtering code also when kunit is configured as a module,
expose test filtering functions to other kunit source files, and use them
in kunit module notifier callback functions. Userspace can then reload
the kunit module with a value of the filter_glob parameter tuned to a
specific kunit test module every time it wants to limit the scope of tests
executed on that module load. Make the kunit.filter* parameters visible
in sysfs for user convenience.
v5: Refresh on tpp of attributes filtering fix
v4: Refresh on top of newly applied attributes patches and changes
introdced by new versions of other patches submitted in series with
this one.
v3: Fix CONFIG_GLOB, required by filtering functions, not selected when
building as a module (lkp@intel.com).
v2: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated
across all uses (lkp@intel.com).
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 18258c60 | 07-Aug-2023 |
Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> |
kunit: Make 'list' action available to kunit test modules
Results from kunit tests reported via dmesg may be interleaved with other
kernel messages. When parsing dmesg for modular kunit results in
kunit: Make 'list' action available to kunit test modules
Results from kunit tests reported via dmesg may be interleaved with other
kernel messages. When parsing dmesg for modular kunit results in real
time, external tools, e.g., Intel GPU tools (IGT), may want to insert
their own test name markers into dmesg at the start of each test, before
any kernel message related to that test appears there, so existing upper
level test result parsers have no doubt which test to blame for a specific
kernel message. Unfortunately, kunit reports names of tests only at their
completion (with the exeption of a not standarized "# Subtest: <name>"
header above a test plan of each test suite or parametrized test).
External tools could be able to insert their own "start of the test"
markers with test names included if they new those names in advance.
Test names could be learned from a list if provided by a kunit test
module.
There exists a feature of listing kunit tests without actually executing
them, but it is now limited to configurations with the kunit module built
in and covers only built-in tests, already available at boot time.
Moreover, switching from list to normal mode requires reboot. If that
feature was also available when kunit is built as a module, userspace
could load the module with action=list parameter, load some kunit test
modules they are interested in and learn about the list of tests provided
by those modules, then unload them, reload the kunit module in normal mode
and execute the tests with their lists already known.
Extend kunit module notifier initialization callback with a processing
path for only listing the tests provided by a module if the kunit action
parameter is set to "list" or "list_attr". For user convenience, make the
kunit.action parameter visible in sysfs.
v2: Don't use a different format, use kunit_exec_list_tests() (Rae),
- refresh on top of new attributes patches, handle newly introduced
kunit.action=list_attr case (Rae).
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| c95e7c05 | 07-Aug-2023 |
Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> |
kunit: Report the count of test suites in a module
According to KTAP specification[1], results should always start from a
header that provides a TAP protocol version, followed by a test plan with
a
kunit: Report the count of test suites in a module
According to KTAP specification[1], results should always start from a
header that provides a TAP protocol version, followed by a test plan with
a count of items to be executed. That pattern should be followed at each
nesting level. In the current implementation of the top-most, i.e., test
suite level, those rules apply only for test suites built into the kernel,
executed and reported on boot. Results submitted to dmesg from kunit test
modules loaded later are missing those top-level headers.
As a consequence, if a kunit test module provides more than one test suite
then, without the top level test plan, external tools that are parsing
dmesg for kunit test output are not able to tell how many test suites
should be expected and whether to continue parsing after complete output
from the first test suite is collected.
Submit the top-level headers also from the kunit test module notifier
initialization callback.
v3: Fix new name of a structure moved to kunit namespace not updated in
executor_test functions (lkp@intel.com).
v2: Use kunit_exec_run_tests() (Mauro, Rae), but prevent it from
emitting the headers when called on load of non-test modules.
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/ktap.html#
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 1c9fd080 | 03-Aug-2023 |
Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> |
kunit: fix uninitialized variables bug in attributes filtering
Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering
patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature.
Fixes: 529534e8cba3
kunit: fix uninitialized variables bug in attributes filtering
Fix smatch warnings regarding uninitialized variables in the filtering
patch of the new KUnit Attributes feature.
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202307270610.s0w4NKEn-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| abbf7381 | 01-Aug-2023 |
Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
Inject fault while probing drm_kunit_helpers.ko, if one of
kunit_next_attr_filter(), kunit_filter_glob_tests() and
kunit_filter_attr_tests()
kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()
Inject fault while probing drm_kunit_helpers.ko, if one of
kunit_next_attr_filter(), kunit_filter_glob_tests() and
kunit_filter_attr_tests() fails, parsed_filters,
parsed_glob.suite_glob/test_glob alloced in
kunit_parse_glob_filter() is leaked.
And the filtered_suite->test_cases alloced in kunit_filter_glob_tests()
or kunit_filter_attr_tests() may also be leaked.
unreferenced object 0xff110001067e4800 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
[<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
[<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
[<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000105d79b00 (size 192):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 96, jiffies 4294671796 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 60 59 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....`Y......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
[<0000000045779fb9>] filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff110001067e6000 (size 1024):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2..........
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<00000000116e8eba>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x4e/0x140
[<00000000e2f9cce9>] kmemdup+0x2c/0x60
[<000000002a36710b>] kunit_filter_suites+0x3e4/0xa50
[<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103f3a800 (size 96):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 98, jiffies 4294671798 (age 763.545s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
f0 e1 5a 88 ff ff ff ff 40 39 bb 8a ff ff ff ff ..Z.....@9......
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<000000006afe50bd>] kunit_filter_suites+0x424/0xa50
[<00000000f452f130>] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x1b7/0x660
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ac0 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.529s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e0 2a a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........*......
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
[<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf880 (size 32):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 104, jiffies 4294671814 (age 763.547s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<00000000bad5427d>] filter_attr_test+0x1e9/0x6a0
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72ae0 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2b a7 01 01 00 11 ff .........+......
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c7b724e7>] kunit_filter_suites+0x108/0xa50
[<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000103caf9c0 (size 32):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 106, jiffies 4294671823 (age 763.538s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<0000000096255c51>] filter_attr_empty_test+0x1b0/0x310
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
unreferenced object 0xff11000101a72b00 (size 16):
comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 108, jiffies 4294671832 (age 763.529s)
hex dump (first 16 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
[<000000000d6e4891>] __kmalloc+0x4d/0x140
[<00000000c47b0f75>] kunit_filter_suites+0x189/0xa50
[<00000000881258cc>] filter_attr_skip_test+0x148/0x770
[<00000000cd1104a7>] kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
[<00000000c654c917>] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
[<00000000d195ac13>] kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
[<00000000b79c1ee9>] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
[<000000001167f7e6>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
Fixes: 5d31f71efcb6 ("kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites")
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 5a175d36 | 28-Jul-2023 |
Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> |
kunit: fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_filter_suites()
As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as
the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err)
kunit: fix wild-memory-access bug in kunit_filter_suites()
As for kunit_filter_suites(), When the filters arg = NULL, such as
the call of kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, "suite2", NULL, NULL, &err)
in filter_suites_test() tese case in kunit, both filter_count and
parsed_filters will not be initialized.
So it's possible to enter kunit_filter_attr_tests(), and the use of
uninitialized parsed_filters will cause below wild-memory-access.
RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89
RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203
RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9
RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920
RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800
R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? die_addr+0x3c/0xa0
? exc_general_protection+0x148/0x220
? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40
? kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
? kunit_filter_suites+0x779/0xa40
? __pfx_kunit_filter_suites+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_kfree+0x10/0x10
? kunit_add_action_or_reset+0x3d/0x50
filter_suites_test+0x1b7/0x440
? __pfx_filter_suites_test+0x10/0x10
? __pfx___schedule+0x10/0x10
? try_to_wake_up+0xa8e/0x1210
? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x86/0xe0
? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
? set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x7c/0xb0
kunit_try_run_case+0x119/0x270
? __kthread_parkme+0xdc/0x160
? __pfx_kunit_try_run_case+0x10/0x10
kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4e/0xa0
? __pfx_kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x2c7/0x3c0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:kunit_filter_suites+0x780/0xa40
Code: fe ff ff e8 42 87 4d ff 41 83 c6 01 49 83 c5 10 49 89 dc 44 39 74 24 50 0f 8e 81 fe ff ff e8 27 87 4d ff 4c 89 e8 48 c1 e8 03 <66> 42 83 3c 38 00 0f 85 af 01 00 00 49 8b 75 00 49 8b 55 08 4c 89
RSP: 0000:ff1100010743fc38 EFLAGS: 00010203
RAX: 03fc4400041d0ff1 RBX: ff1100010389a900 RCX: ffffffff9f940ad9
RDX: ff11000107429740 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ff110001037ec920
RBP: ff1100010743fd50 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffe21c0020e87f1e
R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000032001 R12: ff110001037ec800
R13: 1fe2200020e87f8c R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff1100011b000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ff11000115201000 CR3: 0000000113066001 CR4: 0000000000771ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
Dumping ftrace buffer:
(ftrace buffer empty)
Kernel Offset: 0x1da00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
Rebooting in 1 seconds..
Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes")
Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 529534e8 | 25-Jul-2023 |
Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> |
kunit: Add ability to filter attributes
Add filtering of test attributes. Users can filter tests using the
module_param called "filter".
Filters are imputed in the format: <attribute_name><operatio
kunit: Add ability to filter attributes
Add filtering of test attributes. Users can filter tests using the
module_param called "filter".
Filters are imputed in the format: <attribute_name><operation><value>
Example: kunit.filter="speed>slow"
Operations include: >, <, >=, <=, !=, and =. These operations will act the
same for attributes of the same type but may not between types.
Note multiple filters can be inputted by separating them with a comma.
Example: kunit.filter="speed=slow, module!=example"
Since both suites and test cases can have attributes, there may be
conflicts. The process of filtering follows these rules:
- Filtering always operates at a per-test level.
- If a test has an attribute set, then the test's value is filtered on.
- Otherwise, the value falls back to the suite's value.
- If neither are set, the attribute has a global "default" value, which
is used.
Filtered tests will not be run or show in output. The tests can instead be
skipped using the configurable option "kunit.filter_action=skip".
Note the default settings for running tests remains unfiltered.
Finally, add "filter" methods for the speed and module attributes to parse
and compare attribute values.
Note this filtering functionality will be added to kunit.py in the next
patch.
Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|