| 5773c049 | 14-Aug-2018 |
Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com> |
intc/arm_gic: Add the virtualization extensions to the GIC state
Add the necessary parts of the virtualization extensions state to the
GIC state. We choose to increase the size of the CPU interfaces
intc/arm_gic: Add the virtualization extensions to the GIC state
Add the necessary parts of the virtualization extensions state to the
GIC state. We choose to increase the size of the CPU interfaces state to
add space for the vCPU interfaces (the GIC_NCPU_VCPU macro). This way,
we'll be able to reuse most of the CPU interface code for the vCPUs.
The only exception is the APR value, which is stored in h_apr in the
virtual interface state for vCPUs. This is due to some complications
with the GIC VMState, for which we don't want to break backward
compatibility. APRs being stored in 2D arrays, increasing the second
dimension would lead to some ugly VMState description. To avoid
that, we keep it in h_apr for vCPUs.
The vCPUs are numbered from GIC_NCPU to (GIC_NCPU * 2) - 1. The
`gic_is_vcpu` function help to determine if a given CPU id correspond to
a physical CPU or a virtual one.
For the in-kernel KVM VGIC, since the exposed VGIC does not implement
the virtualization extensions, we report an error if the corresponding
property is set to true.
Signed-off-by: Luc Michel <luc.michel@greensocs.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20180727095421.386-6-luc.michel@greensocs.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
| e1be0a57 | 12-Sep-2017 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
nvic: Implement NVIC_ITNS<n> registers
For v8M, the NVIC has a new set of registers per interrupt,
NVIC_ITNS<n>. These determine whether the interrupt targets Secure
or Non-secure state. Implement t
nvic: Implement NVIC_ITNS<n> registers
For v8M, the NVIC has a new set of registers per interrupt,
NVIC_ITNS<n>. These determine whether the interrupt targets Secure
or Non-secure state. Implement the register read/write code for
these, and make them cause NVIC_IABR, NVIC_ICER, NVIC_ISER,
NVIC_ICPR, NVIC_IPR and NVIC_ISPR to RAZ/WI for non-secure
accesses to fields corresponding to interrupts which are
configured to target secure state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-8-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
show more ...
|
| 3b2e9344 | 12-Sep-2017 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
nvic: Implement AIRCR changes for v8M
The Application Interrupt and Reset Control Register has some changes
for v8M:
* new bits SYSRESETREQS, BFHFNMINS and PRIS: these all have
real state if the
nvic: Implement AIRCR changes for v8M
The Application Interrupt and Reset Control Register has some changes
for v8M:
* new bits SYSRESETREQS, BFHFNMINS and PRIS: these all have
real state if the security extension is implemented and otherwise
are constant
* the PRIGROUP field is banked between security states
* non-secure code can be blocked from using the SYSRESET bit
to reset the system if SYSRESETREQS is set
Implement the new state and the changes to register read and write.
For the moment we ignore the effects of the secure PRIGROUP.
We will implement the effects of PRIS and BFHFNMIS later.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
show more ...
|
| 5255fcf8 | 12-Sep-2017 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
nvic: Add cached vectpending_prio state
Instead of looking up the pending priority
in nvic_pending_prio(), cache it in a new state struct
field. The calculation of the pending priority given
the int
nvic: Add cached vectpending_prio state
Instead of looking up the pending priority
in nvic_pending_prio(), cache it in a new state struct
field. The calculation of the pending priority given
the interrupt number is more complicated in v8M with
the security extension, so the caching will be worthwhile.
This changes nvic_pending_prio() from returning a full
(group + subpriority) priority value to returning a group
priority. This doesn't require changes to its callsites
because we use it only in comparisons of the form
execution_prio > nvic_pending_prio()
and execution priority is always a group priority, so
a test (exec prio > full prio) is true if and only if
(execprio > group_prio).
(Architecturally the expected comparison is with the
group priority for this sort of "would we preempt" test;
we were only doing a test with a full priority as an
optimisation to avoid the mask, which is possible
precisely because the two comparisons always give the
same answer.)
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-5-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
show more ...
|
| e93bc2ac | 12-Sep-2017 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
nvic: Add cached vectpending_is_s_banked state
With banked exceptions, just the exception number in
s->vectpending is no longer sufficient to uniquely identify
the pending exception. Add a vectpendi
nvic: Add cached vectpending_is_s_banked state
With banked exceptions, just the exception number in
s->vectpending is no longer sufficient to uniquely identify
the pending exception. Add a vectpending_is_s_banked bool
which is true if the exception is using the sec_vectors[]
array.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Message-id: 1505240046-11454-4-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org
show more ...
|