| 9b472e85 | 06-May-2021 |
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> |
gcov: clang: drop support for clang-10 and older
LLVM changed the expected function signatures for llvm_gcda_start_file()
and llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Drop the older
imple
gcov: clang: drop support for clang-10 and older
LLVM changed the expected function signatures for llvm_gcda_start_file()
and llvm_gcda_emit_function() in the clang-11 release. Drop the older
implementations and require folks to upgrade their compiler if they're
interested in GCOV support.
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rGcdd683b516d147925212724b09ec6fb792a40041
Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG13a633b438b6500ecad9e4f936ebadf3411d0f44
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210312224132.3413602-3-ndesaulniers@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210413183113.2977432-1-ndesaulniers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@quicinc.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 1391efa9 | 06-May-2021 |
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> |
gcov: use kvmalloc()
Using vmalloc() in gcov is really quite wasteful, many of the objects
allocated are really small (e.g. I've seen 24 bytes.) Use kvmalloc() to
automatically pick the better of k
gcov: use kvmalloc()
Using vmalloc() in gcov is really quite wasteful, many of the objects
allocated are really small (e.g. I've seen 24 bytes.) Use kvmalloc() to
automatically pick the better of kmalloc() or vmalloc() depending on the
size.
[johannes.berg@intel.com: fix clang-11+ build]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210412214210.6e1ecca9cdc5.I24459763acf0591d5e6b31c7e3a59890d802f79c@changeid
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315235453.799e7a9d627d.I741d0db096c6f312910f7f1bcdfde0fda20801a4@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 3180c44f | 06-May-2021 |
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> |
gcov: simplify buffer allocation
Use just a single vmalloc() with struct_size() instead of a separate
kmalloc() for the iter struct.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315235453.b6de4a92096e.Iac4
gcov: simplify buffer allocation
Use just a single vmalloc() with struct_size() instead of a separate
kmalloc() for the iter struct.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210315235453.b6de4a92096e.Iac40a5166589cefbff8449e466bd1b38ea7a17af@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 26ecea08 | 15-Dec-2020 |
Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> |
gcov: fix kernel-doc markup issue
Fix the following kernel-doc issue in gcov:
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:238: warning: Function parameter or member 'dst' not described in 'gcov_info_add'
kernel/gcov
gcov: fix kernel-doc markup issue
Fix the following kernel-doc issue in gcov:
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:238: warning: Function parameter or member 'dst' not described in 'gcov_info_add'
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:238: warning: Function parameter or member 'src' not described in 'gcov_info_add'
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:238: warning: Excess function parameter 'dest' description in 'gcov_info_add'
kernel/gcov/gcc_4_7.c:238: warning: Excess function parameter 'source' description in 'gcov_info_add'
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1605252352-63983-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 6524d794 | 06-Apr-2020 |
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> |
kernel/gcov/fs.c: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension
to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to
kernel/gcov/fs.c: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension
to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302224851.GA26467@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|
| 7ff87182 | 06-Apr-2020 |
Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> |
gcov: gcc_3_4: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension
to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to dec
gcov: gcc_3_4: replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension
to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200302224501.GA14175@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
show more ...
|