net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPR

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout without EEPROM on 88E6250-family switches

[ Upstream commit e44894e2aa4eb311ceda134de8b6f51ff979211b ]

88E6250-family switches have the quirk that the EEPROM Running flag can
get stuck at 1 when no EEPROM is connected, causing
mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to time out. We still want to wait for the
EEPROM however, to avoid interrupting a transfer and leaving the EEPROM
in an invalid state.

The condition to wait for recommended by the hardware spec is the EEInt
flag, however this flag is cleared on read, so before the hardware reset,
is may have been cleared already even though the EEPROM has been read
successfully.

For this reason, we revive the mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() function
that was removed in commit 6ccf50d4d474
("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent") in a
slightly refactored form, and introduce a new
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done_prereset() that additionally handles this
case by triggering another EEPROM reload that can be waited on.

On other switch models without this quirk, mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() is
kept, as it avoids the additional reload.

Fixes: 6ccf50d4d474 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent")
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schiffer <matthias.schiffer@ew.tq-group.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent

Since commit 23d775f12dcd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done
before HW reset") the following error is seen on a imx8mn board

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid EEPROM timeout when EEPROM is absent

Since commit 23d775f12dcd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done
before HW reset") the following error is seen on a imx8mn board with
a 88E6320 switch:

mv88e6085 30be0000.ethernet-1:00: Timeout waiting for EEPROM done

This board does not have an EEPROM attached to the switch though.

This problem is well explained by Andrew Lunn:

"If there is an EEPROM, and the EEPROM contains a lot of data, it could
be that when we perform a hardware reset towards the end of probe, it
interrupts an I2C bus transaction, leaving the I2C bus in a bad state,
and future reads of the EEPROM do not work.

The work around for this was to poll the EEInt status and wait for it
to go true before performing the hardware reset.

However, we have discovered that for some boards which do not have an
EEPROM, EEInt never indicates complete. As a result,
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done() spins for a second and then prints a
warning.

We probably need a different solution than calling
mv88e6xxx_g1_wait_eeprom_done(). The datasheet for 6352 documents the
EEPROM Command register:

bit 15 is:

EEPROM Unit Busy. This bit must be set to a one to start an EEPROM
operation (see EEOp below). Only one EEPROM operation can be
executing at one time so this bit must be zero before setting it to
a one. When the requested EEPROM operation completes this bit will
automatically be cleared to a zero. The transition of this bit from
a one to a zero can be used to generate an interrupt (the EEInt in
Global 1, offset 0x00).

and more interesting is bit 11:

Register Loader Running. This bit is set to one whenever the
register loader is busy executing instructions contained in the
EEPROM."

Change to using mv88e6xxx_g2_eeprom_wait() to fix the timeout error
when the EEPROM chip is not present.

Fixes: 23d775f12dcd ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done before HW reset")
Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for mv88e6390

The switch receives management traffic such as STP and LLDP. However, PTP
messages are not received, only transmitted.

Ideally, the switch woul

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Enable PTP receive for mv88e6390

The switch receives management traffic such as STP and LLDP. However, PTP
messages are not received, only transmitted.

Ideally, the switch would trap all PTP messages to the management CPU. This
particular switch has a PTP block which identifies PTP messages and traps them
to a dedicated port. There is a register to program this destination. This is
not used at the moment.

Therefore, program it to the same port as the MGMT traffic is trapped to. This
allows to receive PTP messages as soon as timestamping is enabled.

In addition, the datasheet mentions that this register is not valid e.g., for
6190 variants. So, add a new PTP operation which is added for the 6390 and 6290
devices.

Tested simply like this on Marvell 88E6390, revision 1:

|/ # ptp4l -2 -i lan4 --tx_timestamp_timeout=40 -m
|[...]
|ptp4l[147.450]: master offset 56 s2 freq +1262 path delay 413
|ptp4l[148.450]: master offset 22 s2 freq +1244 path delay 434
|ptp4l[149.450]: master offset 5 s2 freq +1234 path delay 446
|ptp4l[150.451]: master offset 3 s2 freq +1233 path delay 451
|ptp4l[151.451]: master offset 1 s2 freq +1232 path delay 451
|ptp4l[152.451]: master offset -3 s2 freq +1229 path delay 451
|ptp4l[153.451]: master offset 9 s2 freq +1240 path delay 451

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAFSKS=PJBpvtRJxrR4sG1hyxpnUnQpiHg4SrUNzAhkWnyt9ivg@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix MTU definition

The MTU passed to the DSA driver is the payload size, typically 1500.
However, the switch uses the frame size when applying restrictions.
Adjust the MTU with the s

dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix MTU definition

The MTU passed to the DSA driver is the payload size, typically 1500.
However, the switch uses the frame size when applying restrictions.
Adjust the MTU with the size of the Ethernet header and the frame
checksum. The VLAN header also needs to be included when the frame
size it per port, but not when it is global.

Fixes: 1baf0fac10fb ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use chip-wide max frame size for MTU")
Reported by: 曹煜 <cao88yu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: wrap .set_egress_port method

There are two implementations of the .set_egress_port method, and both
of them, if successful, set chip->*gress_dest_port variable.

To avoid code r

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: wrap .set_egress_port method

There are two implementations of the .set_egress_port method, and both
of them, if successful, set chip->*gress_dest_port variable.

To avoid code repetition, wrap this method into
mv88e6xxx_set_egress_port.

Signed-off-by: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pavana Sharma <pavana.sharma@digi.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done after HW reset

When the switch is hardware reset, it reads the contents of the
EEPROM. This can contain instructions for programming values into
registers a

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Wait for EEPROM done after HW reset

When the switch is hardware reset, it reads the contents of the
EEPROM. This can contain instructions for programming values into
registers and to perform waits between such programming. Reading the
EEPROM can take longer than the 100ms mv88e6xxx_hardware_reset() waits
after deasserting the reset GPIO. So poll the EEPROM done bit to
ensure it is complete.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ruslan Sushko <rus@sushko.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201116164301.977661-1-rus@sushko.dev
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use chip-wide max frame size for MTU

Some of the chips in the mv88e6xxx family don't support jumbo
configuration per port. But they do have a chip-wide max frame size that
can b

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Use chip-wide max frame size for MTU

Some of the chips in the mv88e6xxx family don't support jumbo
configuration per port. But they do have a chip-wide max frame size that
can be used. Use this to approximate the behaviour of configuring a port
based MTU.

Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix masking of egress port

Add missing ~ to the usage of the mask.

Reported-by: Kevin Benson <Kevin.Benson@zii.aero>
Reported-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@zii.aero>
Fixes: 5c74

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Fix masking of egress port

Add missing ~ to the usage of the mask.

Reported-by: Kevin Benson <Kevin.Benson@zii.aero>
Reported-by: Chris Healy <Chris.Healy@zii.aero>
Fixes: 5c74c54ce6ff ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Split monitor port configuration")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Preserve priority when setting CPU port.

The 6390 family uses an extended register to set the port connected to
the CPU. The lower 5 bits indicate the port, the upper three bits

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Preserve priority when setting CPU port.

The 6390 family uses an extended register to set the port connected to
the CPU. The lower 5 bits indicate the port, the upper three bits are
the priority of the frames as they pass through the switch, what
egress queue they should use, etc. Since frames being set to the CPU
are typically management frames, BPDU, IGMP, ARP, etc set the priority
to 7, the reset default, and the highest.

Fixes: 33641994a676 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Monitor and Management tables")
Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Chris Healy <cphealy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for port mirroring

Add support for configuring port mirroring through the cls_matchall
classifier. We do a full ingress and/or egress capture towards a
capture port.

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for port mirroring

Add support for configuring port mirroring through the cls_matchall
classifier. We do a full ingress and/or egress capture towards a
capture port. It allows setting a different capture port for ingress
and egress traffic.

It keeps track of the mirrored ports and the destination ports to
prevent changes to the capture port while other ports are being
mirrored.

Signed-off-by: Iwan R Timmer <irtimmer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Split monitor port configuration

Separate the configuration of the egress and ingress monitor port.
This allows the port mirror functionality to do ingress and egress
port mirro

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Split monitor port configuration

Separate the configuration of the egress and ingress monitor port.
This allows the port mirror functionality to do ingress and egress
port mirroring to separate ports.

Signed-off-by: Iwan R Timmer <irtimmer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove wait and update routines

Now that we have proper Wait Bit and Wait Mask routines, remove the
unused mv88e6xxx_wait routine and its Global 1 and Global 2 variants.

The in

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove wait and update routines

Now that we have proper Wait Bit and Wait Mask routines, remove the
unused mv88e6xxx_wait routine and its Global 1 and Global 2 variants.

The indirect tables such as the Device Mapping Table or Priority
Override Table make use of an Update bit to distinguish reading (0)
from writing (1) operations. After a write operation occurs, the bit
self clears right away so there's no need to wait on it. Thus keep
things simple and remove the mv88e6xxx_update helper as well.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce wait bit routine

Many portions of the driver need to wait until a given bit is set
or cleared. Some busses even have a specific implementation for this
operation. In p

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce wait bit routine

Many portions of the driver need to wait until a given bit is set
or cleared. Some busses even have a specific implementation for this
operation. In preparation for such variant, implement a generic Wait
Bit routine that can be used by the driver core functions.

This allows us to get rid of the custom implementations we may find
in the driver. Note that for the EEPROM bits, BUSY and RUNNING bits
are independent, thus it is more efficient to wait independently for
each bit instead of waiting for their mask.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce wait mask routine

The current mv88e6xxx_wait routine is used to wait for a given mask
to be cleared to zero. However in some cases, the driver may have
to wait for a g

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce wait mask routine

The current mv88e6xxx_wait routine is used to wait for a given mask
to be cleared to zero. However in some cases, the driver may have
to wait for a given mask to be of a certain non-zero value.

Thus provide a generic wait mask routine that will be used to implement
the current mv88e6xxx_wait function, and use it to wait for 88E6185
PPU states.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: wait for 88E6185 PPU disabled

The PPU state of 88E6185 can be either "Disabled at Reset" or
"Disabled after Initialization". Because we intentionally clear the
PPU Enabled bit b

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: wait for 88E6185 PPU disabled

The PPU state of 88E6185 can be either "Disabled at Reset" or
"Disabled after Initialization". Because we intentionally clear the
PPU Enabled bit before checking its state, it is safe to wait for the
MV88E6185_G1_STS_PPU_STATE_DISABLED state explicitly instead of waiting
for any state different than MV88E6185_G1_STS_PPU_STATE_POLLING.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: refactor mv88e6352_g1_reset

The new mv88e6250_g1_reset() is identical to mv88e6352_g1_reset() except
for the call of mv88e6352_g1_wait_ppu_polling(), so refactor the 6352
versio

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: refactor mv88e6352_g1_reset

The new mv88e6250_g1_reset() is identical to mv88e6352_g1_reset() except
for the call of mv88e6352_g1_wait_ppu_polling(), so refactor the 6352
version in term of the 6250 one. No functional change.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for mv88e6250

This adds support for the Marvell 88E6250. I've checked that each
member in the ops-structure makes sense, and basic switchdev
functionality works fine

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for mv88e6250

This adds support for the Marvell 88E6250. I've checked that each
member in the ops-structure makes sense, and basic switchdev
functionality works fine.

It uses the new dual_chip option, and since its port registers start
at SMI address 0x08 or 0x18 (i.e., always sw_addr + 0x08), we need to
introduce a new compatible string in order for the auto-identification
in mv88e6xxx_detect() to work.

The chip has four per port 16-bits statistics registers, two of which
correspond to the existing "sw_in_filtered" and "sw_out_filtered" (but
at offsets 0x13 and 0x10 rather than 0x12 and 0x13, because why should
this be easy...). Wiring up those four statistics seems to require
introducing a STATS_TYPE_PORT_6250 bit or similar, which seems a tad
ugly, so for now this just allows access to the STATS_TYPE_BANK0 ones.

The chip does have ptp support, and the existing
mv88e6352_{gpio,avb,ptp}_ops at first glance seem like they would work
out-of-the-box, but for simplicity (and lack of testing) I'm eliding
this.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map

Quite a few of the existing supported chips that use
mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map as ->ieee_pri_map (including, incidentally,
mv88e6085 itself) actual

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map

Quite a few of the existing supported chips that use
mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map as ->ieee_pri_map (including, incidentally,
mv88e6085 itself) actually have a reset value of 0xfa50 in the
G1_IEEE_PRI register.

The data sheet for the mv88e6095, however, does describe a reset value
of 0xfa41.

So rather than changing the value in the existing callback, introduce
a new variant with the 0xfa50 value. That will be used by the upcoming
mv88e6250, and existing chips can be switched over one by one,
preferably double-checking both the data sheet and actual hardware in
each case - if anybody actually feels this is important enough to
care.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make mv88e6xxx_g1_stats_wait static

mv88e6xxx_g1_stats_wait has no users outside global1.c, so make it
static.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Revi

net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make mv88e6xxx_g1_stats_wait static

mv88e6xxx_g1_stats_wait has no users outside global1.c, so make it
static.

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Reviewed-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...