drm/i915: Replace engine->timeline with a plain list

To continue the onslaught of removing the assumption of a global
execution ordering, another casualty is the engine->timeline. Withou

drm/i915: Replace engine->timeline with a plain list

To continue the onslaught of removing the assumption of a global
execution ordering, another casualty is the engine->timeline. Without an
actual timeline to track, it is overkill and we can replace it with a
much less grand plain list. We still need a list of requests inflight,
for the simple purpose of finding inflight requests (for retiring,
resetting, preemption etc).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch

We need to keep the context image pinned in memory until after the GPU
has finished writing into it. Since it co

drm/i915: Keep contexts pinned until after the next kernel context switch

We need to keep the context image pinned in memory until after the GPU
has finished writing into it. Since it continues to write as we signal
the final breadcrumb, we need to keep it pinned until the request after
it is complete. Currently we know the order in which requests execute on
each engine, and so to remove that presumption we need to identify a
request/context-switch we know must occur after our completion. Any
request queued after the signal must imply a context switch, for
simplicity we use a fresh request from the kernel context.

The sequence of operations for keeping the context pinned until saved is:

- On context activation, we preallocate a node for each physical engine
the context may operate on. This is to avoid allocations during
unpinning, which may be from inside FS_RECLAIM context (aka the
shrinker)

- On context deactivation on retirement of the last active request (which
is before we know the context has been saved), we add the
preallocated node onto a barrier list on each engine

- On engine idling, we emit a switch to kernel context. When this
switch completes, we know that all previous contexts must have been
saved, and so on retiring this request we can finally unpin all the
contexts that were marked as deactivated prior to the switch.

We can enhance this in future by flushing all the idle contexts on a
regular heartbeat pulse of a switch to kernel context, which will also
be used to check for hung engines.

v2: intel_context_active_acquire/_release

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Rename i915_hw_ppgtt to i915_ppgtt

Keeping the _hw_ in there does not help to distinguish it from its
only brethren i915_ggtt, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Rename i915_hw_ppgtt to i915_ppgtt

Keeping the _hw_ in there does not help to distinguish it from its
only brethren i915_ggtt, so drop it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190611091238.15808-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Pull kref into i915_address_space

Make the kref common to both derived structs (i915_ggtt and i915_ppgtt)
so that we can safely reference count an abstract ctx->vm address spac

drm/i915: Pull kref into i915_address_space

Make the kref common to both derived structs (i915_ggtt and i915_ppgtt)
so that we can safely reference count an abstract ctx->vm address space.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190611091238.15808-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Tidy intel_execlists_submission_init

Get to uncore from the engine for better logic organization and use
already available i915 everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursul

drm/i915: Tidy intel_execlists_submission_init

Get to uncore from the engine for better logic organization and use
already available i915 everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190607084521.16845-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915: Convert some more bits to use engine mmio accessors

Remove a couple dev_priv locals as a consequence.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed

drm/i915: Convert some more bits to use engine mmio accessors

Remove a couple dev_priv locals as a consequence.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190607084521.16845-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com

show more ...

drm/i915: Rename intel_context.active to .inflight

Rename the engine this HW context is currently active upon (that we are
flying upon) to disambiguate between the mixture of different a

drm/i915: Rename intel_context.active to .inflight

Rename the engine this HW context is currently active upon (that we are
flying upon) to disambiguate between the mixture of different active
terms (and prevent conflict in future patches).

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Move more GEM objects under gem/

Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuopp

drm/i915: Move more GEM objects under gem/

Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Move shmem object setup to its own file

Split the plain old shmem object into its own file to start decluttering
i915_gem.c

v2: Lose the confusing, hysterical raisins,

drm/i915: Move shmem object setup to its own file

Split the plain old shmem object into its own file to start decluttering
i915_gem.c

v2: Lose the confusing, hysterical raisins, suffix of _gtt.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding

Some users require that when a master batch is executed on one particular
engine, a companion batch is run simultaneously on a specific slave

drm/i915/execlists: Virtual engine bonding

Some users require that when a master batch is executed on one particular
engine, a companion batch is run simultaneously on a specific slave
engine. For this purpose, we introduce virtual engine bonding, allowing
maps of master:slaves to be constructed to constrain which physical
engines a virtual engine may select given a fence on a master engine.

For the moment, we continue to ignore the issue of preemption deferring
the master request for later. Ideally, we would like to then also remove
the slave and run something else rather than have it stall the pipeline.
With load balancing, we should be able to move workload around it, but
there is a similar stall on the master pipeline while it may wait for
the slave to be executed. At the cost of more latency for the bonded
request, it may be interesting to launch both on their engines in
lockstep. (Bubbles abound.)

Opens: Also what about bonding an engine as its own master? It doesn't
break anything internally, so allow the silliness.

v2: Emancipate the bonds
v3: Couple in delayed scheduling for the selftests
v4: Handle invalid mutually exclusive bonding
v5: Mention what the uapi does
v6: s/nbond/num_bonds/

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521211134.16117-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Apply an execution_mask to the virtual_engine

Allow the user to direct which physical engines of the virtual engine
they wish to execute one, as sometimes it is necessary to ov

drm/i915: Apply an execution_mask to the virtual_engine

Allow the user to direct which physical engines of the virtual engine
they wish to execute one, as sometimes it is necessary to override the
load balancing algorithm.

v2: Only kick the virtual engines on context-out if required

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521211134.16117-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine

Having allowed the user to define a set of engines that they will want
to only use, we go one step further and allow them to bind those e

drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine

Having allowed the user to define a set of engines that they will want
to only use, we go one step further and allow them to bind those engines
into a single virtual instance. Submitting a batch to the virtual engine
will then forward it to any one of the set in a manner as best to
distribute load. The virtual engine has a single timeline across all
engines (it operates as a single queue), so it is not able to concurrently
run batches across multiple engines by itself; that is left up to the user
to submit multiple concurrent batches to multiple queues. Multiple users
will be load balanced across the system.

The mechanism used for load balancing in this patch is a late greedy
balancer. When a request is ready for execution, it is added to each
engine's queue, and when an engine is ready for its next request it
claims it from the virtual engine. The first engine to do so, wins, i.e.
the request is executed at the earliest opportunity (idle moment) in the
system.

As not all HW is created equal, the user is still able to skip the
virtual engine and execute the batch on a specific engine, all within the
same queue. It will then be executed in order on the correct engine,
with execution on other virtual engines being moved away due to the load
detection.

A couple of areas for potential improvement left!

- The virtual engine always take priority over equal-priority tasks.
Mostly broken up by applying FQ_CODEL rules for prioritising new clients,
and hopefully the virtual and real engines are not then congested (i.e.
all work is via virtual engines, or all work is to the real engine).

- We require the breadcrumb irq around every virtual engine request. For
normal engines, we eliminate the need for the slow round trip via
interrupt by using the submit fence and queueing in order. For virtual
engines, we have to allow any job to transfer to a new ring, and cannot
coalesce the submissions, so require the completion fence instead,
forcing the persistent use of interrupts.

- We only drip feed single requests through each virtual engine and onto
the physical engines, even if there was enough work to fill all ELSP,
leaving small stalls with an idle CS event at the end of every request.
Could we be greedy and fill both slots? Being lazy is virtuous for load
distribution on less-than-full workloads though.

Other areas of improvement are more general, such as reducing lock
contention, reducing dispatch overhead, looking at direct submission
rather than bouncing around tasklets etc.

sseu: Lift the restriction to allow sseu to be reconfigured on virtual
engines composed of RENDER_CLASS (rcs).

v2: macroize check_user_mbz()
v3: Cancel virtual engines on wedging
v4: Commence commenting
v5: Replace 64b sibling_mask with a list of class:instance
v6: Drop the one-element array in the uabi
v7: Assert it is an virtual engine in to_virtual_engine()
v8: Skip over holes in [class][inst] so we can selftest with (vcs0, vcs2)

Link: https://github.com/intel/media-driver/pull/283
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190521211134.16117-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915/execlists: Drop promotion on unsubmit

With the disappearance of NEWCLIENT, we no longer need to provide the
priority boost on preemption in order to prevent repeated gazumping,

drm/i915/execlists: Drop promotion on unsubmit

With the disappearance of NEWCLIENT, we no longer need to provide the
priority boost on preemption in order to prevent repeated gazumping,
and we can remove the dead code.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190515130052.4475-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Downgrade NEWCLIENT to non-preemptive

Commit 1413b2bc0717 ("drm/i915: Trim NEWCLIENT boosting") had the
intended consequence of not allowing a sequence of work that merely

drm/i915: Downgrade NEWCLIENT to non-preemptive

Commit 1413b2bc0717 ("drm/i915: Trim NEWCLIENT boosting") had the
intended consequence of not allowing a sequence of work that merely
crossed into a new engine the privilege to be promoted to NEWCLIENT
status. It also had the unintended consequence of actually making
NEWCLIENT effective on heavily oversubscribed transcode machines and
impacting upon their throughput.

If we consider a client packet composed of (rcsA, rcsB, vcs) and 30 of
those clients, using the NEWCLIENT boost that will be scheduled as

rcsA x 30, (rcsB, vcs) x 30

where as before it would have been

(rcsA, rcsB, vcs) x 30

That is with NEWCLIENT only boosting the first request of each client,
we would execute all rcsA requests prior to running on the vcs engines;
acruing a lot of dead time as compared to the previous case where the
vcs engine would be started in parallel to processing the second client.

The previous patch has the effect of delaying submission until it is
required by a third party (either the user with an explicit wait, or by
another client/engine). We reduce the NEWCLIENT bump to a mere WAIT,
which has the effect of removing its preemptive grant and reducing it to
the same level as any other user interaction -- that it will not be
promoted above the interengine dependencies, and so preventing NEWCLIENTS
from starving other engines. This a large nerf to the rrul properties of
the current NEWCLIENT, but it still does give prioritised submission to
new requests from light workloads.

References: b16c765122f9 ("drm/i915: Priority boost for new clients")
Fixes: 1413b2bc0717 ("drm/i915: Trim NEWCLIENT boosting") # customer impact
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Rogozhkin <dmitry.v.rogozhkin@intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Ermilov <dmitry.ermilov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190515130052.4475-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915/hangcheck: Replace hangcheck.seqno with RING_HEAD

After realising we need to sample RING_START to detect context switches
from preemption events that do not allow for the seqno

drm/i915/hangcheck: Replace hangcheck.seqno with RING_HEAD

After realising we need to sample RING_START to detect context switches
from preemption events that do not allow for the seqno to advance, we
can also realise that the seqno itself is just a distance along the ring
and so can be replaced by sampling RING_HEAD.

v2: Bonus comment for the mystery separate CS_STALL before MI_USER_INTERRUPT

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190508080704.24223-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915/execlists: Don't apply priority boost for resets

Do not treat reset as a normal preemption event and avoid giving the
guilty request a priority boost for simply being active at

drm/i915/execlists: Don't apply priority boost for resets

Do not treat reset as a normal preemption event and avoid giving the
guilty request a priority boost for simply being active at the time of
reset.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190507122954.6299-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Only reschedule the submission tasklet if preemption is possible

If we couple the scheduler more tightly with the execlists policy, we
can apply the preemption policy to the qu

drm/i915: Only reschedule the submission tasklet if preemption is possible

If we couple the scheduler more tightly with the execlists policy, we
can apply the preemption policy to the question of whether we need to
kick the tasklet at all for this priority bump.

v2: Rephrase it as a core i915 policy and not an execlists foible.
v3: Pull the kick together.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190507122544.12698-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Assert the local engine->wakeref is active

Due to the asynchronous tasklet and recursive GT wakeref, it may happen
that we submit to the engine (underneath it's own wakeref) pr

drm/i915: Assert the local engine->wakeref is active

Due to the asynchronous tasklet and recursive GT wakeref, it may happen
that we submit to the engine (underneath it's own wakeref) prior to the
central wakeref being marked as taken. Switch to checking the local wakeref
for greater consistency.

Fixes: 79ffac8599c4 ("drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190503115225.30831-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915/execlists: Flush the tasklet on parking

Tidy up the cleanup sequence by always ensure that the tasklet is
flushed on parking (before we cleanup). The parking provides a
conv

drm/i915/execlists: Flush the tasklet on parking

Tidy up the cleanup sequence by always ensure that the tasklet is
flushed on parking (before we cleanup). The parking provides a
convenient point to ensure that the backend is truly idle.

v2: Do the full check for idleness before parking, to be sure we flush
any residual interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190503080942.30151-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Move the engine->destroy() vfunc onto the engine

Make the engine responsible for cleaning itself up!

This removes the i915->gt.cleanup vfunc that has been annoying the

drm/i915: Move the engine->destroy() vfunc onto the engine

Make the engine responsible for cleaning itself up!

This removes the i915->gt.cleanup vfunc that has been annoying the
casual reader and myself for the last several years, and helps keep a
future patch to add more cleanup tidy.

v2: Assert that engine->destroy is set after the backend starts
allocating its own state.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190501103204.18632-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Split engine setup/init into two phases

In the next patch, we require the engine vfuncs setup prior to
initialising the pinned kernel contexts, so split the vfunc setup from

drm/i915: Split engine setup/init into two phases

In the next patch, we require the engine vfuncs setup prior to
initialising the pinned kernel contexts, so split the vfunc setup from
the engine initialisation and call it earlier.

v2: s/setup_xcs/setup_common/ for intel_ring_submission_setup()

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190426163336.15906-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy

In the current scheme, on submitting a request we take a single global
GEM wakeref, which trickles down to wake up all GT power domains. This

drm/i915: Invert the GEM wakeref hierarchy

In the current scheme, on submitting a request we take a single global
GEM wakeref, which trickles down to wake up all GT power domains. This
is undesirable as we would like to be able to localise our power
management to the available power domains and to remove the global GEM
operations from the heart of the driver. (The intent there is to push
global GEM decisions to the boundary as used by the GEM user interface.)

Now during request construction, each request is responsible via its
logical context to acquire a wakeref on each power domain it intends to
utilize. Currently, each request takes a wakeref on the engine(s) and
the engines themselves take a chipset wakeref. This gives us a
transition on each engine which we can extend if we want to insert more
powermangement control (such as soft rc6). The global GEM operations
that currently require a struct_mutex are reduced to listening to pm
events from the chipset GT wakeref. As we reduce the struct_mutex
requirement, these listeners should evaporate.

Perhaps the biggest immediate change is that this removes the
struct_mutex requirement around GT power management, allowing us greater
flexibility in request construction. Another important knock-on effect,
is that by tracking engine usage, we can insert a switch back to the
kernel context on that engine immediately, avoiding any extra delay or
inserting global synchronisation barriers. This makes tracking when an
engine and its associated contexts are idle much easier -- important for
when we forgo our assumed execution ordering and need idle barriers to
unpin used contexts. In the process, it means we remove a large chunk of
code whose only purpose was to switch back to the kernel context.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424200717.1686-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Introduce context->enter() and context->exit()

We wish to start segregating the power management into different control
domains, both with respect to the hardware and the user

drm/i915: Introduce context->enter() and context->exit()

We wish to start segregating the power management into different control
domains, both with respect to the hardware and the user interface. The
first step is that at the lowest level flow of requests, we want to
process a context event (and not a global GEM operation). In this patch,
we introduce the context callbacks that in future patches will be
redirected to per-engine interfaces leading to global operations as
required.

The intent is that this will be guarded by the timeline->mutex, except
that retiring has not quite finished transitioning over from being
guarded by struct_mutex. So at the moment it is protected by
struct_mutex with a reminded to switch.

v2: Rename default handlers to intel_context_enter_engine.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424200717.1686-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...

drm/i915: Move GraphicsTechnology files under gt/

Start partitioning off the code that talks to the hardware (GT) from the
uapi layers and move the device facing code under gt/

drm/i915: Move GraphicsTechnology files under gt/

Start partitioning off the code that talks to the hardware (GT) from the
uapi layers and move the device facing code under gt/

One casualty is s/intel_ringbuffer.h/intel_engine.h/ with the plan to
subdivide that header and body further (and split out the submission
code from the ringbuffer and logical context handling). This patch aims
to be simple motion so git can fixup inflight patches with little mess.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424174839.7141-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

show more ...