/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm946es/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/sa1100/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/include/configs/ |
H A D | colibri_pxa270.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | pm9g45.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | smdkc100.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | pm9261.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | zipitz2.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | meesc.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | pm9263.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | at91sam9261ek.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | at91sam9rlek.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | at91sam9260ek.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | at91sam9m10g45ek.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | mx31pdk.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | at91sam9263ek.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | s5p_goni.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
H A D | mx51evk.h | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/pxa/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/ |
H A D | start.S | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|
/openbmc/u-boot/ |
H A D | README | e03f31697478e9edd523f34b1ed54b6ff2cb7242 Thu Oct 28 13:52:49 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Drop support for CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT
For ARM systems, before ELF relocation was introduced, CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT coul be used to prevent *COPYING* the U-Boot image from whereever it was loaded to it's link address (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE). The name was badly chosen, as no relocation was performed at all, it was just a memcpy().
With ELF relocation, this does not work like that any more, and related boards need to be fixed anyway. So don't keep this relict any longer.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de> Tested-by: Reinhard Meyer <u-boot@emk-elektronik.de>
|