History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_defer.c (Results 1 – 25 of 125)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24
# cd3c2cf3 26-Mar-2024 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: use xfs_defer_pending objects to recover intent items

commit 03f7767c9f6120ac933378fdec3bfd78bf07bc11 upstream.

One thing I never quite got around to doing is porting the log intent
item recov

xfs: use xfs_defer_pending objects to recover intent items

commit 03f7767c9f6120ac933378fdec3bfd78bf07bc11 upstream.

One thing I never quite got around to doing is porting the log intent
item recovery code to reconstruct the deferred pending work state. As a
result, each intent item open codes xfs_defer_finish_one in its recovery
method, because that's what the EFI code did before xfs_defer.c even
existed.

This is a gross thing to have left unfixed -- if an EFI cannot proceed
due to busy extents, we end up creating separate new EFIs for each
unfinished work item, which is a change in behavior from what runtime
would have done.

Worse yet, Long Li pointed out that there's a UAF in the recovery code.
The ->commit_pass2 function adds the intent item to the AIL and drops
the refcount. The one remaining refcount is now owned by the recovery
mechanism (aka the log intent items in the AIL) with the intent of
giving the refcount to the intent done item in the ->iop_recover
function.

However, if something fails later in recovery, xlog_recover_finish will
walk the recovered intent items in the AIL and release them. If the CIL
hasn't been pushed before that point (which is possible since we don't
force the log until later) then the intent done release will try to free
its associated intent, which has already been freed.

This patch starts to address this mess by having the ->commit_pass2
functions recreate the xfs_defer_pending state. The next few patches
will fix the recovery functions.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24
# cd3c2cf3 26-Mar-2024 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: use xfs_defer_pending objects to recover intent items

commit 03f7767c9f6120ac933378fdec3bfd78bf07bc11 upstream.

One thing I never quite got around to doing is porting the log intent
item recov

xfs: use xfs_defer_pending objects to recover intent items

commit 03f7767c9f6120ac933378fdec3bfd78bf07bc11 upstream.

One thing I never quite got around to doing is porting the log intent
item recovery code to reconstruct the deferred pending work state. As a
result, each intent item open codes xfs_defer_finish_one in its recovery
method, because that's what the EFI code did before xfs_defer.c even
existed.

This is a gross thing to have left unfixed -- if an EFI cannot proceed
due to busy extents, we end up creating separate new EFIs for each
unfinished work item, which is a change in behavior from what runtime
would have done.

Worse yet, Long Li pointed out that there's a UAF in the recovery code.
The ->commit_pass2 function adds the intent item to the AIL and drops
the refcount. The one remaining refcount is now owned by the recovery
mechanism (aka the log intent items in the AIL) with the intent of
giving the refcount to the intent done item in the ->iop_recover
function.

However, if something fails later in recovery, xlog_recover_finish will
walk the recovered intent items in the AIL and release them. If the CIL
hasn't been pushed before that point (which is possible since we don't
force the log until later) then the intent done release will try to free
its associated intent, which has already been freed.

This patch starts to address this mess by having the ->commit_pass2
functions recreate the xfs_defer_pending state. The next few patches
will fix the recovery functions.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.23
# 005be668 08-Feb-2024 Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>

xfs: abort intent items when recovery intents fail

commit f8f9d952e42dd49ae534f61f2fa7ca0876cb9848 upstream.

When recovering intents, we capture newly created intent items as part of
committing rec

xfs: abort intent items when recovery intents fail

commit f8f9d952e42dd49ae534f61f2fa7ca0876cb9848 upstream.

When recovering intents, we capture newly created intent items as part of
committing recovered intent items. If intent recovery fails at a later
point, we forget to remove those newly created intent items from the AIL
and hang:

[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/539/stack
[<0>] xfs_ail_push_all_sync+0x174/0x230
[<0>] xfs_unmount_flush_inodes+0x8d/0xd0
[<0>] xfs_mountfs+0x15f7/0x1e70
[<0>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x10ec/0x1b20
[<0>] get_tree_bdev+0x3c8/0x730
[<0>] vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2c0
[<0>] path_mount+0xecf/0x1800
[<0>] do_mount+0xf3/0x110
[<0>] __x64_sys_mount+0x154/0x1f0
[<0>] do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
[<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

When newly created intent items fail to commit via transaction, intent
recovery hasn't created done items for these newly created intent items,
so the capture structure is the sole owner of the captured intent items.
We must release them explicitly or else they leak:

unreferenced object 0xffff888016719108 (size 432):
comm "mount", pid 529, jiffies 4294706839 (age 144.463s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
08 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff 08 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff ..q.......q.....
18 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff 18 91 71 16 80 88 ff ff ..q.......q.....
backtrace:
[<ffffffff8230c68f>] xfs_efi_init+0x18f/0x1d0
[<ffffffff8230c720>] xfs_extent_free_create_intent+0x50/0x150
[<ffffffff821b671a>] xfs_defer_create_intents+0x16a/0x340
[<ffffffff821bac3e>] xfs_defer_ops_capture_and_commit+0x8e/0xad0
[<ffffffff82322bb9>] xfs_cui_item_recover+0x819/0x980
[<ffffffff823289b6>] xlog_recover_process_intents+0x246/0xb70
[<ffffffff8233249a>] xlog_recover_finish+0x8a/0x9a0
[<ffffffff822eeafb>] xfs_log_mount_finish+0x2bb/0x4a0
[<ffffffff822c0f4f>] xfs_mountfs+0x14bf/0x1e70
[<ffffffff822d1f80>] xfs_fs_fill_super+0x10d0/0x1b20
[<ffffffff81a21fa2>] get_tree_bdev+0x3d2/0x6d0
[<ffffffff81a1ee09>] vfs_get_tree+0x89/0x2c0
[<ffffffff81a9f35f>] path_mount+0xecf/0x1800
[<ffffffff81a9fd83>] do_mount+0xf3/0x110
[<ffffffff81aa00e4>] __x64_sys_mount+0x154/0x1f0
[<ffffffff83968739>] do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80

Fix the problem above by abort intent items that don't have a done item
when recovery intents fail.

Fixes: e6fff81e4870 ("xfs: proper replay of deferred ops queued during log recovery")
Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 23f3d79f 08-Feb-2024 Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>

xfs: factor out xfs_defer_pending_abort

commit 2a5db859c6825b5d50377dda9c3cc729c20cad43 upstream.

Factor out xfs_defer_pending_abort() from xfs_defer_trans_abort(), which
not use transaction parame

xfs: factor out xfs_defer_pending_abort

commit 2a5db859c6825b5d50377dda9c3cc729c20cad43 upstream.

Factor out xfs_defer_pending_abort() from xfs_defer_trans_abort(), which
not use transaction parameter, so it can be used after the transaction
life cycle.

Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24
# d5c88131 11-Apr-2023 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: allow queued AG intents to drain before scrubbing

When a writer thread executes a chain of log intent items, the AG header
buffer locks will cycle during a transaction roll to get from one inte

xfs: allow queued AG intents to drain before scrubbing

When a writer thread executes a chain of log intent items, the AG header
buffer locks will cycle during a transaction roll to get from one intent
item to the next in a chain. Although scrub takes all AG header buffer
locks, this isn't sufficient to guard against scrub checking an AG while
that writer thread is in the middle of finishing a chain because there's
no higher level locking primitive guarding allocation groups.

When there's a collision, cross-referencing between data structures
(e.g. rmapbt and refcountbt) yields false corruption events; if repair
is running, this results in incorrect repairs, which is catastrophic.

Fix this by adding to the perag structure the count of active intents
and make scrub wait until it has both AG header buffer locks and the
intent counter reaches zero.

One quirk of the drain code is that deferred bmap updates also bump and
drop the intent counter. A fundamental decision made during the design
phase of the reverse mapping feature is that updates to the rmapbt
records are always made by the same code that updates the primary
metadata. In other words, callers of bmapi functions expect that the
bmapi functions will queue deferred rmap updates.

Some parts of the reflink code queue deferred refcount (CUI) and bmap
(BUI) updates in the same head transaction, but the deferred work
manager completely finishes the CUI before the BUI work is started. As
a result, the CUI drops the intent count long before the deferred rmap
(RUI) update even has a chance to bump the intent count. The only way
to keep the intent count elevated between the CUI and RUI is for the BUI
to bump the counter until the RUI has been created.

A second quirk of the intent drain code is that deferred work items must
increment the intent counter as soon as the work item is added to the
transaction. When a BUI completes and queues an RUI, the RUI must
increment the counter before the BUI decrements it. The only way to
accomplish this is to require that the counter be bumped as soon as the
deferred work item is created in memory.

In the next patches we'll improve on this facility, but this patch
provides the basic functionality.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42
# 4183e4f2 22-May-2022 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: share xattr name and value buffers when logging xattr updates

While running xfs/297 and generic/642, I noticed a crash in
xfs_attri_item_relog when it tries to copy the attr name to the new
xat

xfs: share xattr name and value buffers when logging xattr updates

While running xfs/297 and generic/642, I noticed a crash in
xfs_attri_item_relog when it tries to copy the attr name to the new
xattri log item. I think what happened here was that we called
->iop_commit on the old attri item (which nulls out the pointers) as
part of a log force at the same time that a chained attr operation was
ongoing. The system was busy enough that at some later point, the defer
ops operation decided it was necessary to relog the attri log item, but
as we've detached the name buffer from the old attri log item, we can't
copy it to the new one, and kaboom.

I think there's a broader refcounting problem with LARP mode -- the
setxattr code can return to userspace before the CIL actually formats
and commits the log item, which results in a UAF bug. Therefore, the
xattr log item needs to be able to retain a reference to the name and
value buffers until the log items have completely cleared the log.
Furthermore, each time we create an intent log item, we allocate new
memory and (re)copy the contents; sharing here would be very useful.

Solve the UAF and the unnecessary memory allocations by having the log
code create a single refcounted buffer to contain the name and value
contents. This buffer can be passed from old to new during a relog
operation, and the logging code can (optionally) attach it to the
xfs_attr_item for reuse when LARP mode is enabled.

This also fixes a problem where the xfs_attri_log_item objects weren't
being freed back to the same cache where they came from.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.18
# 4136e38a 22-May-2022 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: put attr[id] log item cache init with the others

Initialize and destroy the xattr log item caches in the same places that
we do all the other log item caches.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <d

xfs: put attr[id] log item cache init with the others

Initialize and destroy the xattr log item caches in the same places that
we do all the other log item caches.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


# e2c78949 22-May-2022 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: use a separate slab cache for deferred xattr work state

Create a separate slab cache for struct xfs_attr_item objects, since we
can pack the (104-byte) intent items more tightly than we can wit

xfs: use a separate slab cache for deferred xattr work state

Create a separate slab cache for struct xfs_attr_item objects, since we
can pack the (104-byte) intent items more tightly than we can with the
general slab cache objects. On x86, this means 39 intents per memory
page instead of 32.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39
# e0c41089 12-May-2022 Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

xfs: separate out initial attr_set states

We current use XFS_DAS_UNINIT for several steps in the attr_set
state machine. We use it for setting shortform xattrs, converting
from shortform to leaf, le

xfs: separate out initial attr_set states

We current use XFS_DAS_UNINIT for several steps in the attr_set
state machine. We use it for setting shortform xattrs, converting
from shortform to leaf, leaf add, leaf-to-node and leaf add. All of
these things are essentially known before we start the state machine
iterating, so we really should separate them out:

XFS_DAS_SF_ADD:
- tries to do a shortform add
- on success -> done
- on ENOSPC converts to leaf, -> XFS_DAS_LEAF_ADD
- on error, dies.

XFS_DAS_LEAF_ADD:
- tries to do leaf add
- on success:
- inline attr -> done
- remote xattr || REPLACE -> XFS_DAS_FOUND_LBLK
- on ENOSPC converts to node, -> XFS_DAS_NODE_ADD
- on error, dies

XFS_DAS_NODE_ADD:
- tries to do node add
- on success:
- inline attr -> done
- remote xattr || REPLACE -> XFS_DAS_FOUND_NBLK
- on error, dies

This makes it easier to understand how the state machine starts
up and sets us up on the path to further state machine
simplifications.

This also converts the DAS state tracepoints to use strings rather
than numbers, as converting between enums and numbers requires
manual counting rather than just reading the name.

This also introduces a XFS_DAS_DONE state so that we can trace
successful operation completions easily.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson<allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


# 1d08e11d 09-May-2022 Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

xfs: Implement attr logging and replay

This patch adds the needed routines to create, log and recover logged
extended attribute intents.

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.c

xfs: Implement attr logging and replay

This patch adds the needed routines to create, log and recover logged
extended attribute intents.

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.38
# fd920008 03-May-2022 Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

xfs: Set up infrastructure for log attribute replay

Currently attributes are modified directly across one or more
transactions. But they are not logged or replayed in the event of an
error. The goal

xfs: Set up infrastructure for log attribute replay

Currently attributes are modified directly across one or more
transactions. But they are not logged or replayed in the event of an
error. The goal of log attr replay is to enable logging and replaying
of attribute operations using the existing delayed operations
infrastructure. This will later enable the attributes to become part of
larger multi part operations that also must first be recorded to the
log. This is mostly of interest in the scheme of parent pointers which
would need to maintain an attribute containing parent inode information
any time an inode is moved, created, or removed. Parent pointers would
then be of interest to any feature that would need to quickly derive an
inode path from the mount point. Online scrub, nfs lookups and fs grow
or shrink operations are all features that could take advantage of this.

This patch adds two new log item types for setting or removing
attributes as deferred operations. The xfs_attri_log_item will log an
intent to set or remove an attribute. The corresponding
xfs_attrd_log_item holds a reference to the xfs_attri_log_item and is
freed once the transaction is done. Both log items use a generic
xfs_attr_log_format structure that contains the attribute name, value,
flags, inode, and an op_flag that indicates if the operations is a set
or remove.

[dchinner: added extra little bits needed for intent whiteouts]

Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


# 7b3ec2b2 03-May-2022 Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

xfs: Fix double unlock in defer capture code

The new deferred attr patch set uncovered a double unlock in the
recent port of the defer ops capture and continue code. During log
recovery, we're allo

xfs: Fix double unlock in defer capture code

The new deferred attr patch set uncovered a double unlock in the
recent port of the defer ops capture and continue code. During log
recovery, we're allowed to hold buffers to a transaction that's being
used to replay an intent item. When we capture the resources as part
of scheduling a continuation of an intent chain, we call xfs_buf_hold
to retain our reference to the buffer beyond the transaction commit,
but we do /not/ call xfs_trans_bhold to maintain the buffer lock.
This means that xfs_defer_ops_continue needs to relock the buffers
before xfs_defer_restore_resources joins then tothe new transaction.

Additionally, the buffers should not be passed back via the dres
structure since they need to remain locked unlike the inodes. So
simply set dr_bufs to zero after populating the dres structure.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


# 5ddd658e 03-May-2022 Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>

xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents

If the first operation in a string of defer ops has no intents,
then there is no reason to commit it before running the first call
to

xfs: don't commit the first deferred transaction without intents

If the first operation in a string of defer ops has no intents,
then there is no reason to commit it before running the first call
to xfs_defer_finish_one(). This allows the defer ops to be used
effectively for non-intent based operations without requiring an
unnecessary extra transaction commit when first called.

This fixes a regression in per-attribute modification transaction
count when delayed attributes are not being used.

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33, v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12
# c201d9ca 12-Oct-2021 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: rename xfs_bmap_add_free to xfs_free_extent_later

xfs_bmap_add_free isn't a block mapping function; it schedules deferred
freeing operations for a later point in a compound transaction chain.
W

xfs: rename xfs_bmap_add_free to xfs_free_extent_later

xfs_bmap_add_free isn't a block mapping function; it schedules deferred
freeing operations for a later point in a compound transaction chain.
While it's primarily used by bunmapi, its use has expanded beyond that.
Move it to xfs_alloc.c and rename the function since it's now general
freeing functionality. Bring the slab cache bits in line with the
way we handle the other intent items.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>

show more ...


# f3c799c2 12-Oct-2021 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: create slab caches for frequently-used deferred items

Create slab caches for the high-level structures that coordinate
deferred intent items, since they're used fairly heavily.

Signed-off-by:

xfs: create slab caches for frequently-used deferred items

Create slab caches for the high-level structures that coordinate
deferred intent items, since they're used fairly heavily.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67
# 512edfac 16-Sep-2021 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: port the defer ops capture and continue to resource capture

When log recovery tries to recover a transaction that had log intent
items attached to it, it has to save certain parts of the transa

xfs: port the defer ops capture and continue to resource capture

When log recovery tries to recover a transaction that had log intent
items attached to it, it has to save certain parts of the transaction
state (reservation, dfops chain, inodes with no automatic unlock) so
that it can finish single-stepping the recovered transactions before
finishing the chains.

This is done with the xfs_defer_ops_capture and xfs_defer_ops_continue
functions. Right now they open-code this functionality, so let's port
this to the formalized resource capture structure that we introduced in
the previous patch. This enables us to hold up to two inodes and two
buffers during log recovery, the same way we do for regular runtime.

With this patch applied, we'll be ready to support atomic extent swap
which holds two inodes; and logged xattrs which holds one inode and one
xattr leaf buffer.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

show more ...


# c5db9f93 16-Sep-2021 Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

xfs: formalize the process of holding onto resources across a defer roll

Transaction users are allowed to flag up to two buffers and two inodes
for ownership preservation across a deferred transacti

xfs: formalize the process of holding onto resources across a defer roll

Transaction users are allowed to flag up to two buffers and two inodes
for ownership preservation across a deferred transaction roll. Hoist
the variables and code responsible for this out of xfs_defer_trans_roll
so that we can use it for the defer capture mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Henderson <allison.henderson@oracle.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12, v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14, v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9, v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12
# 74f4d6a1 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: only relog deferred intent items if free space in the log gets low

Now that we have the ability to ask the log how far the tail needs to be
pushed to maintain its free space targets, augment th

xfs: only relog deferred intent items if free space in the log gets low

Now that we have the ability to ask the log how far the tail needs to be
pushed to maintain its free space targets, augment the decision to relog
an intent item so that we only do it if the log has hit the 75% full
threshold. There's no point in relogging an intent into the same
checkpoint, and there's no need to relog if there's plenty of free space
in the log.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 4e919af7 27-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: periodically relog deferred intent items

There's a subtle design flaw in the deferred log item code that can lead
to pinning the log tail. Taking up the defer ops chain examples from
the previ

xfs: periodically relog deferred intent items

There's a subtle design flaw in the deferred log item code that can lead
to pinning the log tail. Taking up the defer ops chain examples from
the previous commit, we can get trapped in sequences like this:

Caller hands us a transaction t0 with D0-D3 attached. The defer ops
chain will look like the following if the transaction rolls succeed:

t1: D0(t0), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)
t2: d4(t1), d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)
t3: d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)
...
t9: d9(t7), D3(t0)
t10: D3(t0)
t11: d10(t10), d11(t10)
t12: d11(t10)

In transaction 9, we finish d9 and try to roll to t10 while holding onto
an intent item for D3 that we logged in t0.

The previous commit changed the order in which we place new defer ops in
the defer ops processing chain to reduce the maximum chain length. Now
make xfs_defer_finish_noroll capable of relogging the entire chain
periodically so that we can always move the log tail forward. Most
chains will never get relogged, except for operations that generate very
long chains (large extents containing many blocks with different sharing
levels) or are on filesystems with small logs and a lot of ongoing
metadata updates.

Callers are now required to ensure that the transaction reservation is
large enough to handle logging done items and new intent items for the
maximum possible chain length. Most callers are careful to keep the
chain lengths low, so the overhead should be minimal.

The decision to relog an intent item is made based on whether the intent
was logged in a previous checkpoint, since there's no point in relogging
an intent into the same checkpoint.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

show more ...


# 27dada07 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: change the order in which child and parent defer ops are finished

The defer ops code has been finishing items in the wrong order -- if a
top level defer op creates items A and B, and finishing

xfs: change the order in which child and parent defer ops are finished

The defer ops code has been finishing items in the wrong order -- if a
top level defer op creates items A and B, and finishing item A creates
more defer ops A1 and A2, we'll put the new items on the end of the
chain and process them in the order A B A1 A2. This is kind of weird,
since it's convenient for programmers to be able to think of A and B as
an ordered sequence where all the sub-tasks for A must finish before we
move on to B, e.g. A A1 A2 D.

Right now, our log intent items are not so complex that this matters,
but this will become important for the atomic extent swapping patchset.
In order to maintain correct reference counting of extents, we have to
unmap and remap extents in that order, and we want to complete that work
before moving on to the next range that the user wants to swap. This
patch fixes defer ops to satsify that requirement.

The primary symptom of the incorrect order was noticed in an early
performance analysis of the atomic extent swap code. An astonishingly
large number of deferred work items accumulated when userspace requested
an atomic update of two very fragmented files. The cause of this was
traced to the same ordering bug in the inner loop of
xfs_defer_finish_noroll.

If the ->finish_item method of a deferred operation queues new deferred
operations, those new deferred ops are appended to the tail of the
pending work list. To illustrate, say that a caller creates a
transaction t0 with four deferred operations D0-D3. The first thing
defer ops does is roll the transaction to t1, leaving us with:

t1: D0(t0), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)

Let's say that finishing each of D0-D3 will create two new deferred ops.
After finish D0 and roll, we'll have the following chain:

t2: D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1)

d4 and d5 were logged to t1. Notice that while we're about to start
work on D1, we haven't actually completed all the work implied by D0
being finished. So far we've been careful (or lucky) to structure the
dfops callers such that D1 doesn't depend on d4 or d5 being finished,
but this is a potential logic bomb.

There's a second problem lurking. Let's see what happens as we finish
D1-D3:

t3: D2(t0), D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2)
t4: D3(t0), d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3)
t5: d4(t1), d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4)

Let's say that d4-d11 are simple work items that don't queue any other
operations, which means that we can complete each d4 and roll to t6:

t6: d5(t1), d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4)
t7: d6(t2), d7(t2), d8(t3), d9(t3), d10(t4), d11(t4)
...
t11: d10(t4), d11(t4)
t12: d11(t4)
<done>

When we try to roll to transaction #12, we're holding defer op d11,
which we logged way back in t4. This means that the tail of the log is
pinned at t4. If the log is very small or there are a lot of other
threads updating metadata, this means that we might have wrapped the log
and cannot get roll to t11 because there isn't enough space left before
we'd run into t4.

Let's shift back to the original failure. I mentioned before that I
discovered this flaw while developing the atomic file update code. In
that scenario, we have a defer op (D0) that finds a range of file blocks
to remap, creates a handful of new defer ops to do that, and then asks
to be continued with however much work remains.

So, D0 is the original swapext deferred op. The first thing defer ops
does is rolls to t1:

t1: D0(t0)

We try to finish D0, logging d1 and d2 in the process, but can't get all
the work done. We log a done item and a new intent item for the work
that D0 still has to do, and roll to t2:

t2: D0'(t1), d1(t1), d2(t1)

We roll and try to finish D0', but still can't get all the work done, so
we log a done item and a new intent item for it, requeue D0 a second
time, and roll to t3:

t3: D0''(t2), d1(t1), d2(t1), d3(t2), d4(t2)

If it takes 48 more rolls to complete D0, then we'll finally dispense
with D0 in t50:

t50: D<fifty primes>(t49), d1(t1), ..., d102(t50)

We then try to roll again to get a chain like this:

t51: d1(t1), d2(t1), ..., d101(t50), d102(t50)
...
t152: d102(t50)
<done>

Notice that in rolling to transaction #51, we're holding on to a log
intent item for d1 that was logged in transaction #1. This means that
the tail of the log is pinned at t1. If the log is very small or there
are a lot of other threads updating metadata, this means that we might
have wrapped the log and cannot roll to t51 because there isn't enough
space left before we'd run into t1. This is of course problem #2 again.

But notice the third problem with this scenario: we have 102 defer ops
tied to this transaction! Each of these items are backed by pinned
kernel memory, which means that we risk OOM if the chains get too long.

Yikes. Problem #1 is a subtle logic bomb that could hit someone in the
future; problem #2 applies (rarely) to the current upstream, and problem
#3 applies to work under development.

This is not how incremental deferred operations were supposed to work.
The dfops design of logging in the same transaction an intent-done item
and a new intent item for the work remaining was to make it so that we
only have to juggle enough deferred work items to finish that one small
piece of work. Deferred log item recovery will find that first
unfinished work item and restart it, no matter how many other intent
items might follow it in the log. Therefore, it's ok to put the new
intents at the start of the dfops chain.

For the first example, the chains look like this:

t2: d4(t1), d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)
t3: d5(t1), D1(t0), D2(t0), D3(t0)
...
t9: d9(t7), D3(t0)
t10: D3(t0)
t11: d10(t10), d11(t10)
t12: d11(t10)

For the second example, the chains look like this:

t1: D0(t0)
t2: d1(t1), d2(t1), D0'(t1)
t3: d2(t1), D0'(t1)
t4: D0'(t1)
t5: d1(t4), d2(t4), D0''(t4)
...
t148: D0<50 primes>(t147)
t149: d101(t148), d102(t148)
t150: d102(t148)
<done>

This actually sucks more for pinning the log tail (we try to roll to t10
while holding an intent item that was logged in t1) but we've solved
problem #1. We've also reduced the maximum chain length from:

sum(all the new items) + nr_original_items

to:

max(new items that each original item creates) + nr_original_items

This solves problem #3 by sharply reducing the number of defer ops that
can be attached to a transaction at any given time. The change makes
the problem of log tail pinning worse, but is improvement we need to
solve problem #2. Actually solving #2, however, is left to the next
patch.

Note that a subsequent analysis of some hard-to-trigger reflink and COW
livelocks on extremely fragmented filesystems (or systems running a lot
of IO threads) showed the same symptoms -- uncomfortably large numbers
of incore deferred work items and occasional stalls in the transaction
grant code while waiting for log reservations. I think this patch and
the next one will also solve these problems.

As originally written, the code used list_splice_tail_init instead of
list_splice_init, so change that, and leave a short comment explaining
our actions.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

show more ...


# ff4ab5e0 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: fix an incore inode UAF in xfs_bui_recover

In xfs_bui_item_recover, there exists a use-after-free bug with regards
to the inode that is involved in the bmap replay operation. If the
mapping op

xfs: fix an incore inode UAF in xfs_bui_recover

In xfs_bui_item_recover, there exists a use-after-free bug with regards
to the inode that is involved in the bmap replay operation. If the
mapping operation does not complete, we call xfs_bmap_unmap_extent to
create a deferred op to finish the unmapping work, and we retain a
pointer to the incore inode.

Unfortunately, the very next thing we do is commit the transaction and
drop the inode. If reclaim tears down the inode before we try to finish
the defer ops, we dereference garbage and blow up. Therefore, create a
way to join inodes to the defer ops freezer so that we can maintain the
xfs_inode reference until we're done with the inode.

Note: This imposes the requirement that there be enough memory to keep
every incore inode in memory throughout recovery.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

show more ...


# 929b92f6 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation

When xfs_defer_capture extracts the deferred ops and transaction state
from a transaction, it should record the transaction res

xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining transaction reservation

When xfs_defer_capture extracts the deferred ops and transaction state
from a transaction, it should record the transaction reservation type
from the old transaction so that when we continue the dfops chain, we
still use the same reservation parameters.

Doing this means that the log item recovery functions get to determine
the transaction reservation instead of abusing tr_itruncate in yet
another part of xfs.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

show more ...


# 4f9a60c4 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining block reservations

When xfs_defer_capture extracts the deferred ops and transaction state
from a transaction, it should record the remaining block rese

xfs: xfs_defer_capture should absorb remaining block reservations

When xfs_defer_capture extracts the deferred ops and transaction state
from a transaction, it should record the remaining block reservations so
that when we continue the dfops chain, we can reserve the same number of
blocks to use. We capture the reservations for both data and realtime
volumes.

This adds the requirement that every log intent item recovery function
must be careful to reserve enough blocks to handle both itself and all
defer ops that it can queue. On the other hand, this enables us to do
away with the handwaving block estimation nonsense that was going on in
xlog_finish_defer_ops.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

show more ...


# e6fff81e 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: proper replay of deferred ops queued during log recovery

When we replay unfinished intent items that have been recovered from the
log, it's possible that the replay will cause the creation of m

xfs: proper replay of deferred ops queued during log recovery

When we replay unfinished intent items that have been recovered from the
log, it's possible that the replay will cause the creation of more
deferred work items. As outlined in commit 509955823cc9c ("xfs: log
recovery should replay deferred ops in order"), later work items have an
implicit ordering dependency on earlier work items. Therefore, recovery
must replay the items (both recovered and created) in the same order
that they would have been during normal operation.

For log recovery, we enforce this ordering by using an empty transaction
to collect deferred ops that get created in the process of recovering a
log intent item to prevent them from being committed before the rest of
the recovered intent items. After we finish committing all the
recovered log items, we allocate a transaction with an enormous block
reservation, splice our huge list of created deferred ops into that
transaction, and commit it, thereby finishing all those ops.

This is /really/ hokey -- it's the one place in XFS where we allow
nested transactions; the splicing of the defer ops list is is inelegant
and has to be done twice per recovery function; and the broken way we
handle inode pointers and block reservations cause subtle use-after-free
and allocator problems that will be fixed by this patch and the two
patches after it.

Therefore, replace the hokey empty transaction with a structure designed
to capture each chain of deferred ops that are created as part of
recovering a single unfinished log intent. Finally, refactor the loop
that replays those chains to do so using one transaction per chain.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

show more ...


# b80b29d6 25-Sep-2020 Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>

xfs: remove xfs_defer_reset

Remove this one-line helper since the assert is trivially true in one
call site and the rest obscures a bitmask operation.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@o

xfs: remove xfs_defer_reset

Remove this one-line helper since the assert is trivially true in one
call site and the rest obscures a bitmask operation.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

show more ...


12345