btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty

[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]

When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_di

btrfs: abort transaction on generation mismatch when marking eb as dirty

[ Upstream commit 50564b651d01c19ce732819c5b3c3fd60707188e ]

When marking an extent buffer as dirty, at btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(),
we check if its generation matches the running transaction and if not we
just print a warning. Such mismatch is an indicator that something really
went wrong and only printing a warning message (and stack trace) is not
enough to prevent a corruption. Allowing a transaction to commit with such
an extent buffer will trigger an error if we ever try to read it from disk
due to a generation mismatch with its parent generation.

So abort the current transaction with -EUCLEAN if we notice a generation
mismatch. For this we need to pass a transaction handle to
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() which is always available except in test code,
in which case we can pass NULL since it operates on dummy extent buffers
and all test roots have a single node/leaf (root node at level 0).

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffer after snapshotting a new subvolume

When creating a snapshot of a subvolume that was created in the current
transaction, we can end up not persisting a dirty extent

btrfs: fix unwritten extent buffer after snapshotting a new subvolume

When creating a snapshot of a subvolume that was created in the current
transaction, we can end up not persisting a dirty extent buffer that is
referenced by the snapshot, resulting in IO errors due to checksum failures
when trying to read the extent buffer later from disk. A sequence of steps
that leads to this is the following:

1) At ioctl.c:create_subvol() we allocate an extent buffer, with logical
address 36007936, for the leaf/root of a new subvolume that has an ID
of 291. We mark the extent buffer as dirty, and at this point the
subvolume tree has a single node/leaf which is also its root (level 0);

2) We no longer commit the transaction used to create the subvolume at
create_subvol(). We used to, but that was recently removed in
commit 1b53e51a4a8f ("btrfs: don't commit transaction for every subvol
create");

3) The transaction used to create the subvolume has an ID of 33, so the
extent buffer 36007936 has a generation of 33;

4) Several updates happen to subvolume 291 during transaction 33, several
files created and its tree height changes from 0 to 1, so we end up with
a new root at level 1 and the extent buffer 36007936 is now a leaf of
that new root node, which is extent buffer 36048896.

The commit root remains as 36007936, since we are still at transaction
33;

5) Creation of a snapshot of subvolume 291, with an ID of 292, starts at
ioctl.c:create_snapshot(). This triggers a commit of transaction 33 and
we end up at transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot(), in the critical
section of a transaction commit.

There we COW the root of subvolume 291, which is extent buffer 36048896.
The COW operation returns extent buffer 36048896, since there's no need
to COW because the extent buffer was created in this transaction and it
was not written yet.

The we call btrfs_copy_root() against the root node 36048896. During
this operation we allocate a new extent buffer to turn into the root
node of the snapshot, copy the contents of the root node 36048896 into
this snapshot root extent buffer, set the owner to 292 (the ID of the
snapshot), etc, and then we call btrfs_inc_ref(). This will create a
delayed reference for each leaf pointed by the root node with a
reference root of 292 - this includes a reference for the leaf
36007936.

After that we set the bit BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW in the root's state.

Then we call btrfs_insert_dir_item(), to create the directory entry in
in the tree of subvolume 291 that points to the snapshot. This ends up
needing to modify leaf 36007936 to insert the respective directory
items. Because the bit BTRFS_ROOT_FORCE_COW is set for the root's state,
we need to COW the leaf. We end up at btrfs_force_cow_block() and then
at update_ref_for_cow().

At update_ref_for_cow() we call btrfs_block_can_be_shared() which
returns false, despite the fact the leaf 36007936 is shared - the
subvolume's root and the snapshot's root point to that leaf. The
reason that it incorrectly returns false is because the commit root
of the subvolume is extent buffer 36007936 - it was the initial root
of the subvolume when we created it. So btrfs_block_can_be_shared()
which has the following logic:

int btrfs_block_can_be_shared(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct extent_buffer *buf)
{
if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE, &root->state) &&
buf != root->node && buf != root->commit_root &&
(btrfs_header_generation(buf) <=
btrfs_root_last_snapshot(&root->root_item) ||
btrfs_header_flag(buf, BTRFS_HEADER_FLAG_RELOC)))
return 1;

return 0;
}

Returns false (0) since 'buf' (extent buffer 36007936) matches the
root's commit root.

As a result, at update_ref_for_cow(), we don't check for the number
of references for extent buffer 36007936, we just assume it's not
shared and therefore that it has only 1 reference, so we set the local
variable 'refs' to 1.

Later on, in the final if-else statement at update_ref_for_cow():

static noinline int update_ref_for_cow(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root,
struct extent_buffer *buf,
struct extent_buffer *cow,
int *last_ref)
{
(...)
if (refs > 1) {
(...)
} else {
(...)
btrfs_clear_buffer_dirty(trans, buf);
*last_ref = 1;
}
}

So we mark the extent buffer 36007936 as not dirty, and as a result
we don't write it to disk later in the transaction commit, despite the
fact that the snapshot's root points to it.

Attempting to access the leaf or dumping the tree for example shows
that the extent buffer was not written:

$ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -t 292 /dev/sdb
btrfs-progs v6.2.2
file tree key (292 ROOT_ITEM 33)
node 36110336 level 1 items 2 free space 119 generation 33 owner 292
node 36110336 flags 0x1(WRITTEN) backref revision 1
checksum stored a8103e3e
checksum calced a8103e3e
fs uuid 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79
chunk uuid e8c9c885-78f4-4d31-85fe-89e5f5fd4a07
key (256 INODE_ITEM 0) block 36007936 gen 33
key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) block 36052992 gen 33
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
total bytes 107374182400
bytes used 38572032
uuid 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79

The respective on disk region is full of zeroes as the device was
trimmed at mkfs time.

Obviously 'btrfs check' also detects and complains about this:

$ btrfs check /dev/sdb
Opening filesystem to check...
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdb
UUID: 90c9a46f-ae9f-4626-9aff-0cbf3e2e3a79
generation: 33 (33)
[1/7] checking root items
[2/7] checking extents
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
bad tree block 36007936, bytenr mismatch, want=36007936, have=0
owner ref check failed [36007936 4096]
ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
[3/7] checking free space tree
[4/7] checking fs roots
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
checksum verify failed on 36007936 wanted 0x00000000 found 0x86005f29
bad tree block 36007936, bytenr mismatch, want=36007936, have=0
The following tree block(s) is corrupted in tree 292:
tree block bytenr: 36110336, level: 1, node key: (256, 1, 0)
root 292 root dir 256 not found
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
found 38572032 bytes used, error(s) found
total csum bytes: 16048
total tree bytes: 1265664
total fs tree bytes: 1118208
total extent tree bytes: 65536
btree space waste bytes: 562598
file data blocks allocated: 65978368
referenced 36569088

Fix this by updating btrfs_block_can_be_shared() to consider that an
extent buffer may be shared if it matches the commit root and if its
generation matches the current transaction's generation.

This can be reproduced with the following script:

$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash

MNT=/mnt/sdi
DEV=/dev/sdi

# Use a filesystem with a 64K node size so that we have the same node
# size on every machine regardless of its page size (on x86_64 default
# node size is 16K due to the 4K page size, while on PPC it's 64K by
# default). This way we can make sure we are able to create a btree for
# the subvolume with a height of 2.
mkfs.btrfs -f -n 64K $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

btrfs subvolume create $MNT/subvol

# Create a few empty files on the subvolume, this bumps its btree
# height to 2 (root node at level 1 and 2 leaves).
for ((i = 1; i <= 300; i++)); do
echo -n > $MNT/subvol/file_$i
done

btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/subvol $MNT/subvol/snap

umount $DEV

btrfs check $DEV

Running it on a 6.5 kernel (or any 6.6-rc kernel at the moment):

$ ./test.sh
Create subvolume '/mnt/sdi/subvol'
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi/subvol' in '/mnt/sdi/subvol/snap'
Opening filesystem to check...
Checking filesystem on /dev/sdi
UUID: bbdde2ff-7d02-45ca-8a73-3c36f23755a1
[1/7] checking root items
[2/7] checking extents
parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5
parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5
parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5
Ignoring transid failure
owner ref check failed [30539776 65536]
ERROR: errors found in extent allocation tree or chunk allocation
[3/7] checking free space tree
[4/7] checking fs roots
parent transid verify failed on 30539776 wanted 7 found 5
Ignoring transid failure
Wrong key of child node/leaf, wanted: (256, 1, 0), have: (2, 132, 0)
Wrong generation of child node/leaf, wanted: 5, have: 7
root 257 root dir 256 not found
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
found 917504 bytes used, error(s) found
total csum bytes: 0
total tree bytes: 851968
total fs tree bytes: 393216
total extent tree bytes: 65536
btree space waste bytes: 736550
file data blocks allocated: 0
referenced 0

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

Fixes: 1b53e51a4a8f ("btrfs: don't commit transaction for every subvol create")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: remove v0 extent handling

The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have
any report from the community either.

So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error

btrfs: remove v0 extent handling

The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have
any report from the community either.

So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error handling, and just
treat them as regular extent tree corruption.

This patch would remove the btrfs_print_v0_err() helper, and enhance the
involved error handling to treat them just as any extent tree
corruption. No reports regarding v0 extents have been seen since the
graceful handling was added in 2018.

This involves:

- btrfs_backref_add_tree_node()
This change is a little tricky, the new code is changed to only handle
BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY.

But this is safe, as we have rejected any unknown inline refs through
btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type().
For keyed backrefs, we're safe to skip anything we don't know (that's
if it can pass tree-checker in the first place).

- btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
- lookup_inline_extent_backref()
- run_delayed_extent_op()
- __btrfs_free_extent()
- add_tree_block()
Regular error handling of unexpected extent tree item, and abort
transaction (if we have a trans handle).

- remove_extent_data_ref()
It's pretty much the same as the regular rejection of unknown backref
key.
But for this particular case, we can also remove a BUG_ON().

- extent_data_ref_count()
We can remove the BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY BUG_ON(), as it would be
rejected by the only caller.

- btrfs_print_leaf()
Remove the handling for BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page

One of the CI runs triggered the following panic

assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:22

btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page

One of the CI runs triggered the following panic

assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 923660 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3+ #1
pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
sp : ffff800093213720
x29: ffff800093213720 x28: ffff8000932138b4 x27: 000000000c280000
x26: 00000001b5d00000 x25: 000000000c281000 x24: 000000000c281fff
x23: 0000000000001000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff42b95bf880
x20: ffff42b9528e0000 x19: 0000000000001000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
x17: 667274622f736620 x16: 6e69202c65746176 x15: 0000000000000028
x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 00000000002672d7 x12: 0000000000000000
x11: ffffcd3f0ccd9204 x10: ffffcd3f0554ae50 x9 : ffffcd3f0379528c
x8 : ffff800093213428 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffffcd3f091771e8
x5 : ffff42b97f333948 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff42b9556cde80 x0 : 000000000000004f
Call trace:
btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
btrfs_subpage_set_dirty+0x38/0xa0
btrfs_page_set_dirty+0x58/0x88
relocate_one_page+0x204/0x5f0
relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x11c/0x180
relocate_data_extent+0xd0/0xf8
relocate_block_group+0x3d0/0x4e8
btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2d8/0x490
btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x54/0x1a8
btrfs_balance+0x7f4/0x1150
btrfs_ioctl+0x10f0/0x20b8
__arm64_sys_ioctl+0x120/0x11d8
invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8
do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x158
el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
Code: 91098021 b0007fa0 91346000 97e9c6d2 (d4210000)

This is the same problem outlined in 17b17fcd6d44 ("btrfs:
set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand") , and the
fix is the same. I originally looked for the same pattern elsewhere in
our code, but mistakenly skipped over this code because I saw the page
cache readahead before we set_page_extent_mapped, not realizing that
this was only in the !page case, that we can still end up with a
!uptodate page and then do the btrfs_read_folio further down.

The fix here is the same as the above mentioned patch, move the
set_page_extent_mapped call to after the btrfs_read_folio() block to
make sure that we have the subpage blocksize stuff setup properly before
using the page.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: make find_first_extent_bit() return a boolean

Currently find_first_extent_bit() returns a 0 if it found a range in the
given io tree and 1 if it didn't find any. There's no need to return any

btrfs: make find_first_extent_bit() return a boolean

Currently find_first_extent_bit() returns a 0 if it found a range in the
given io tree and 1 if it didn't find any. There's no need to return any
errors, so make the return value a boolean and invert the logic to make
more sense: return true if it found a range and false if it didn't find
any range.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

[CAUSE]
The root cause of the triggered ASSERT() is we can

btrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

[CAUSE]
The root cause of the triggered ASSERT() is we can have a race between
quota tree creation and relocation.

This leads us to create a duplicated quota tree in the
btrfs_read_fs_root() path, and since it's treated as fs tree, it would
have ROOT_SHAREABLE flag, causing us to create a reloc tree for it.

The bug itself is fixed by a dedicated patch for it, but this already
taught us the ASSERT() is not something straightforward for
developers.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of using an ASSERT(), let's handle it gracefully and output
extra info about the mismatch reloc roots to help debug.

Also with the above ASSERT() removed, we can trigger ASSERT(0)s inside
merge_reloc_roots() later.
Also replace those ASSERT(0)s with WARN_ON()s.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reported-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums

Both callers of btrfs_reloc_clone_csums allocate the ordered_extent that
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums operates on. Switch them to use
btrfs_alloc

btrfs: pass an ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums

Both callers of btrfs_reloc_clone_csums allocate the ordered_extent that
btrfs_reloc_clone_csums operates on. Switch them to use
btrfs_alloc_ordered_extent instead of btrfs_add_ordered_extent and
pass the ordered_extent to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums instead of doing an
extra lookup.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: rename the bytenr field in struct btrfs_ordered_sum to logical

btrfs_ordered_sum::bytendr stores a logical address. Make that clear by
renaming it to ->logical.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumsh

btrfs: rename the bytenr field in struct btrfs_ordered_sum to logical

btrfs_ordered_sum::bytendr stores a logical address. Make that clear by
renaming it to ->logical.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: drop gfp from parameter extent state helpers

Now that all extent state bit helpers effectively take the GFP_NOFS mask
(and GFP_NOWAIT is encoded in the bits) we can remove the parameter.
This

btrfs: drop gfp from parameter extent state helpers

Now that all extent state bit helpers effectively take the GFP_NOFS mask
(and GFP_NOWAIT is encoded in the bits) we can remove the parameter.
This reduces stack consumption in many functions and simplifies a lot of
code.

Net effect on module on a release build:

text data bss dec hex filename
1250432 20985 16088 1287505 13a551 pre/btrfs.ko
1247074 20985 16088 1284147 139833 post/btrfs.ko

DELTA: -3358

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: open code set_extent_bits

This helper calls set_extent_bit with two more parameters set to default
values, but otherwise it's purpose is not clear.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de

btrfs: open code set_extent_bits

This helper calls set_extent_bit with two more parameters set to default
values, but otherwise it's purpose is not clear.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: output affected files when relocation fails

[PROBLEM]
When relocation fails (mostly due to checksum mismatch), we only got
very cryptic error messages like:

BTRFS info (device dm-4): reloc

btrfs: output affected files when relocation fails

[PROBLEM]
When relocation fails (mostly due to checksum mismatch), we only got
very cryptic error messages like:

BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group 13631488 flags data
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): csum failed root -9 ino 257 off 0 csum 0x373e1ae3 expected csum 0x98757625 mirror 1
BTRFS error (device dm-4): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 1, gen 0
BTRFS info (device dm-4): balance: ended with status: -5

The end user has to decipher the above messages and use various tools to
locate the affected files and find a way to fix the problem (mostly
deleting the file). This is not an easy work even for experienced
developer, not to mention the end users.

[SCRUB IS DOING BETTER]
By contrast, scrub is providing much better error messages:

BTRFS error (device dm-4): unable to fixup (regular) error at logical 13631488 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 physical 13631488
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): checksum error at logical 13631488 on dev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1, physical 13631488, root 5, inode 257, offset 0, length 4096, links 1 (path: file)
BTRFS info (device dm-4): scrub: finished on devid 1 with status: 0

Which provides the affected files directly to the end user.

[IMPROVEMENT]
Instead of the generic data checksum error messages, which is not doing
a good job for data reloc inodes, this patch introduce a scrub like
backref walking based solution.

When a sector fails its checksum for data reloc inode, we go the
following workflow:

- Get the real logical bytenr
For data reloc inode, the file offset is the offset inside the block
group.
Thus the real logical bytenr is @file_off + @block_group->start.

- Do an extent type check
If it's tree blocks it's much easier to handle, just go through
all the tree block backref.

- Do a backref walk and inode path resolution for data extents
This is mostly the same as scrub.
But unfortunately we can not reuse the same function as the output
format is different.

Now the new output would be more user friendly:

BTRFS info (device dm-4): relocating block group 13631488 flags data
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): csum failed root -9 ino 257 off 0 logical 13631488 csum 0x373e1ae3 expected csum 0x98757625 mirror 1
BTRFS warning (device dm-4): checksum error at logical 13631488 mirror 1 root 5 inode 257 offset 0 length 4096 links 1 (path: file)
BTRFS error (device dm-4): bdev /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 errs: wr 0, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 2, gen 0
BTRFS info (device dm-4): balance: ended with status: -5

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: fix backref walking not returning all inode refs

When using the logical to ino ioctl v2, if the flag to ignore offsets of
file extent items (BTRFS_LOGICAL_INO_ARGS_IGNORE_OFFSET) is given, th

btrfs: fix backref walking not returning all inode refs

When using the logical to ino ioctl v2, if the flag to ignore offsets of
file extent items (BTRFS_LOGICAL_INO_ARGS_IGNORE_OFFSET) is given, the
backref walking code ends up not returning references for all file offsets
of an inode that point to the given logical bytenr. This happens since
kernel 6.2, commit 6ce6ba534418 ("btrfs: use a single argument for extent
offset in backref walking functions") because:

1) It mistakenly skipped the search for file extent items in a leaf that
point to the target extent if that flag is given. Instead it should
only skip the filtering done by check_extent_in_eb() - that is, it
should not avoid the calls to that function (or find_extent_in_eb(),
which uses it).

2) It was also not building a list of inode extent elements (struct
extent_inode_elem) if we have multiple inode references for an extent
when the ignore offset flag is given to the logical to ino ioctl - it
would leave a single element, only the last one that was found.

These stem from the confusing old interface for backref walking functions
where we had an extent item offset argument that was a pointer to a u64
and another boolean argument that indicated if the offset should be
ignored, but the pointer could be NULL. That NULL case is used by
relocation, qgroup extent accounting and fiemap, simply to avoid building
the inode extent list for each reference, as it's not necessary for those
use cases and therefore avoids memory allocations and some computations.

Fix this by adding a boolean argument to the backref walk context
structure to indicate that the inode extent list should not be built,
make relocation set that argument to true and fix the backref walking
logic to skip the calls to check_extent_in_eb() and find_extent_in_eb()
only if this new argument is true, instead of 'ignore_extent_item_pos'
being true.

A test case for fstests will be added soon, to provide cover not only
for these cases but to the logical to ino ioctl in general as well, as
currently we do not have a test case for it.

Reported-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHhfkvwo=nmzrJSqZ2qMfF-rZB-ab6ahHnCD_sq9h4o8v+M7QQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 6ce6ba534418 ("btrfs: use a single argument for extent offset in backref walking functions")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.2+
Tested-by: Vladimir Panteleev <git@vladimir.panteleev.md>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: open code btrfs_bin_search()

btrfs_bin_search() is a simple wrapper that searches for the whole slots
by calling btrfs_generic_bin_search() with the starting slot/first_slot
preset to 0.

Thi

btrfs: open code btrfs_bin_search()

btrfs_bin_search() is a simple wrapper that searches for the whole slots
by calling btrfs_generic_bin_search() with the starting slot/first_slot
preset to 0.

This simple wrapper can be open coded as btrfs_bin_search().

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use PAGE_{ALIGN, ALIGNED, ALIGN_DOWN} macro

The header file linux/mm.h provides PAGE_ALIGN, PAGE_ALIGNED,
PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN macros. Use these macros to make code more
concise.

Signed-off-by: Y

btrfs: use PAGE_{ALIGN, ALIGNED, ALIGN_DOWN} macro

The header file linux/mm.h provides PAGE_ALIGN, PAGE_ALIGNED,
PAGE_ALIGN_DOWN macros. Use these macros to make code more
concise.

Signed-off-by: Yushan Zhou <katrinzhou@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: split the bio submission path into a separate file

The code used by btrfs_submit_bio only interacts with the rest of
volumes.c through __btrfs_map_block (which itself is a more generic
versio

btrfs: split the bio submission path into a separate file

The code used by btrfs_submit_bio only interacts with the rest of
volumes.c through __btrfs_map_block (which itself is a more generic
version of two exported helpers) and does not really have anything
to do with volumes.c. Create a new bio.c file and a bio.h header
going along with it for the btrfs_bio-based storage layer, which
will grow even more going forward.

Also update the file with my copyright notice given that a large
part of the moved code was written or rewritten by me.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: introduce a bitmap based csum range search function

Although we have an existing function, btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), to
find all data checksums for a range, it's based on a btrfs_ordered_su

btrfs: introduce a bitmap based csum range search function

Although we have an existing function, btrfs_lookup_csums_range(), to
find all data checksums for a range, it's based on a btrfs_ordered_sum
list.

For the incoming RAID56 data checksum verification at RMW time, we don't
want to waste time by allocating temporary memory.

So this patch will introduce a new helper, btrfs_lookup_csums_bitmap().
It will use bitmap based result, which will be a perfect fit for later
RAID56 usage.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: concentrate all tree block parentness check parameters into one structure

There are several different tree block parentness check parameters used
across several helpers:

- level
Mandatory

btrfs: concentrate all tree block parentness check parameters into one structure

There are several different tree block parentness check parameters used
across several helpers:

- level
Mandatory

- transid
Under most cases it's mandatory, but there are several backref cases
which skips this check.

- owner_root
- first_key
Utilized by most top-down tree search routine. Otherwise can be
skipped.

Those four members are not always mandatory checks, and some of them are
the same u64, which means if some arguments got swapped compiler will
not catch it.

Furthermore if we're going to further expand the parentness check, we
need to modify quite some helpers just to add one more parameter.

This patch will concentrate all these members into a structure called
btrfs_tree_parent_check, and pass that structure for the following
helpers:

- btrfs_read_extent_buffer()
- read_tree_block()

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_add_delayed_iput

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Ster

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_add_delayed_iput

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: drop private_data parameter from extent_io_tree_init

All callers except one pass NULL, so the parameter can be dropped and
the inode::io_tree initialization can be open coded.

Reviewed-by: A

btrfs: drop private_data parameter from extent_io_tree_init

All callers except one pass NULL, so the parameter can be dropped and
the inode::io_tree initialization can be open coded.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_inode_unlock

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_inode_unlock

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_inode_lock

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <ds

btrfs: pass btrfs_inode to btrfs_inode_lock

The function is for internal interfaces so we should use the
btrfs_inode.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use a structure to pass arguments to backref walking functions

The public backref walking functions have quite a lot of arguments that
are passed down the call stack to find_parent_nodes(), t

btrfs: use a structure to pass arguments to backref walking functions

The public backref walking functions have quite a lot of arguments that
are passed down the call stack to find_parent_nodes(), the core function
of the backref walking code.

The next patches in series will need to add even arguments to these
functions that should be passed not only to find_parent_nodes(), but also
to other functions used by the later (directly or even lower in the call
stack).

So create a structure to hold all these arguments and state used by the
main backref walking function, find_parent_nodes(), and use it as the
argument for the public backref walking functions iterate_extent_inodes(),
btrfs_find_all_leafs() and btrfs_find_all_roots().

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: use a single argument for extent offset in backref walking functions

The interface for find_parent_nodes() has two extent offset related
arguments:

1) One u64 pointer argument for the extent

btrfs: use a single argument for extent offset in backref walking functions

The interface for find_parent_nodes() has two extent offset related
arguments:

1) One u64 pointer argument for the extent offset;

2) One boolean argument to tell if the extent offset should be ignored or
not.

These are confusing, becase the extent offset pointer can be NULL and in
some cases callers pass a NULL value as a way to tell the backref walking
code to ignore offsets in file extent items (and simply consider all file
extent items that point to the target data extent).

The boolean argument was added in commit c995ab3cda3f ("btrfs: add a flag
to iterate_inodes_from_logical to find all extent refs for uncompressed
extents"), but it was never really necessary, it was enough if it could
find a way to get a NULL value passed to the "extent_item_pos" argument of
find_parent_nodes(). The arguments are also passed to functions called
by find_parent_nodes() and respective helper functions, which further
makes everything more complicated than needed.

Then we have several backref walking related functions that end up calling
find_parent_nodes(), either directly or through some other function that
they call, and for many we have to use an "extent_item_pos" (u64) argument
and a boolean "ignore_offset" argument too.

This is confusing and not really necessary. So use a single argument to
specify the extent offset, as a simple u64 and not as a pointer, but
using a special value of (u64)-1, defined as a documented constant, to
indicate when the extent offset should be ignored.

This is also preparation work for the upcoming patches in the series that
add other arguments to find_parent_nodes() and other related functions
that use it.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: move super_block specific helpers into super.h

This will make syncing fs.h to user space a little easier if we can pull
the super block specific helpers out of fs.h and put them in super.h.

btrfs: move super_block specific helpers into super.h

This will make syncing fs.h to user space a little easier if we can pull
the super block specific helpers out of fs.h and put them in super.h.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...

btrfs: move relocation prototypes into relocation.h

Move these out of ctree.h into relocation.h to cut down on code in
ctree.h

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-of

btrfs: move relocation prototypes into relocation.h

Move these out of ctree.h into relocation.h to cut down on code in
ctree.h

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...