Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 (Results 1 – 25 of 105) sorted by relevance

12345

/openbmc/linux/drivers/rtc/
H A Drtc-rc5t619.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-mt2712.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-meson-vrtc.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-wilco-ec.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-aspeed.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-cadence.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-meson.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-sd3078.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-isl12026.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-imx-sc.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-digicolor.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-rv3032.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-ps3.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Dsysfs.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-goldfish.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-ab-eoz9.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-sc27xx.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-bd70528.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-fsl-ftm-alarm.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-pic32.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-mxc_v2.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-starfire.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-cpcap.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-ftrtc010.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl
H A Drtc-ds1347.cdiff fdcfd854333be5b30377dc5daa9cd0fa1643a979 Mon Nov 09 10:34:08 CST 2020 Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> rtc: rework rtc_register_device() resource management

rtc_register_device() is a managed interface but it doesn't use devres
by itself - instead it marks an rtc_device as "registered" and the devres
callback for devm_rtc_allocate_device() takes care of resource release.

This doesn't correspond with the design behind devres where managed
structures should not be aware of being managed. The correct solution
here is to register a separate devres callback for unregistering the
device.

While at it: rename rtc_register_device() to devm_rtc_register_device()
and add it to the list of managed interfaces in devres.rst. This way we
can avoid any potential confusion of driver developers who may expect
there to exist a corresponding unregister function.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109163409.24301-8-brgl@bgdev.pl

12345