arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes

commit 49c87f7677746f3c5bd16c81b23700bb6b88bfd4 upstream.

arm64 supports multiple huge_pte sizes. Some of the sizes are covered by

arm64: hugetlb: Fix huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for non-present ptes

commit 49c87f7677746f3c5bd16c81b23700bb6b88bfd4 upstream.

arm64 supports multiple huge_pte sizes. Some of the sizes are covered by
a single pte entry at a particular level (PMD_SIZE, PUD_SIZE), and some
are covered by multiple ptes at a particular level (CONT_PTE_SIZE,
CONT_PMD_SIZE). So the function has to figure out the size from the
huge_pte pointer. This was previously done by walking the pgtable to
determine the level and by using the PTE_CONT bit to determine the
number of ptes at the level.

But the PTE_CONT bit is only valid when the pte is present. For
non-present pte values (e.g. markers, migration entries), the previous
implementation was therefore erroneously determining the size. There is
at least one known caller in core-mm, move_huge_pte(), which may call
huge_ptep_get_and_clear() for a non-present pte. So we must be robust to
this case. Additionally the "regular" ptep_get_and_clear() is robust to
being called for non-present ptes so it makes sense to follow the
behavior.

Fix this by using the new sz parameter which is now provided to the
function. Additionally when clearing each pte in a contig range, don't
gather the access and dirty bits if the pte is not present.

An alternative approach that would not require API changes would be to
store the PTE_CONT bit in a spare bit in the swap entry pte for the
non-present case. But it felt cleaner to follow other APIs' lead and
just pass in the size.

As an aside, PTE_CONT is bit 52, which corresponds to bit 40 in the swap
entry offset field (layout of non-present pte). Since hugetlb is never
swapped to disk, this field will only be populated for markers, which
always set this bit to 0 and hwpoison swap entries, which set the offset
field to a PFN; So it would only ever be 1 for a 52-bit PVA system where
memory in that high half was poisoned (I think!). So in practice, this
bit would almost always be zero for non-present ptes and we would only
clear the first entry if it was actually a contiguous block. That's
probably a less severe symptom than if it was always interpreted as 1
and cleared out potentially-present neighboring PTEs.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 66b3923a1a0f ("arm64: hugetlb: add support for PTE contiguous bit")
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226120656.2400136-3-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

mm: hugetlb: Add huge page size param to huge_ptep_get_and_clear()

commit 02410ac72ac3707936c07ede66e94360d0d65319 upstream.

In order to fix a bug, arm64 needs to be told the size of the huge page

mm: hugetlb: Add huge page size param to huge_ptep_get_and_clear()

commit 02410ac72ac3707936c07ede66e94360d0d65319 upstream.

In order to fix a bug, arm64 needs to be told the size of the huge page
for which the huge_pte is being cleared in huge_ptep_get_and_clear().
Provide for this by adding an `unsigned long sz` parameter to the
function. This follows the same pattern as huge_pte_clear() and
set_huge_pte_at().

This commit makes the required interface modifications to the core mm as
well as all arches that implement this function (arm64, loongarch, mips,
parisc, powerpc, riscv, s390, sparc). The actual arm64 bug will be fixed
in a separate commit.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 66b3923a1a0f ("arm64: hugetlb: add support for PTE contiguous bit")
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> # riscv
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com> # s390
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250226120656.2400136-2-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

arm64/mm: Ensure adequate HUGE_MAX_HSTATE

[ Upstream commit 1e5823c8e86de83a43d59a522b4de29066d3b306 ]

This asserts that HUGE_MAX_HSTATE is sufficient enough preventing potential
hugetlb_max_hstate

arm64/mm: Ensure adequate HUGE_MAX_HSTATE

[ Upstream commit 1e5823c8e86de83a43d59a522b4de29066d3b306 ]

This asserts that HUGE_MAX_HSTATE is sufficient enough preventing potential
hugetlb_max_hstate runtime overflow in hugetlb_add_hstate() thus triggering
a BUG_ON() there after.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241202064407.53807-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...

arm64: Ensure bits ASID[15:8] are masked out when the kernel uses 8-bit ASIDs

commit c0900d15d31c2597dd9f634c8be2b71762199890 upstream.

Linux currently sets the TCR_EL1.AS bit unconditionally durin

arm64: Ensure bits ASID[15:8] are masked out when the kernel uses 8-bit ASIDs

commit c0900d15d31c2597dd9f634c8be2b71762199890 upstream.

Linux currently sets the TCR_EL1.AS bit unconditionally during CPU
bring-up. On an 8-bit ASID CPU, this is RES0 and ignored, otherwise
16-bit ASIDs are enabled. However, if running in a VM and the hypervisor
reports 8-bit ASIDs (ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1.ASIDBits == 0) on a 16-bit ASIDs
CPU, Linux uses bits 8 to 63 as a generation number for tracking old
process ASIDs. The bottom 8 bits of this generation end up being written
to TTBR1_EL1 and also used for the ASID-based TLBI operations as the
upper 8 bits of the ASID. Following an ASID roll-over event we can have
threads of the same application with the same 8-bit ASID but different
generation numbers running on separate CPUs. Both TLB caching and the
TLBI operations will end up using different actual 16-bit ASIDs for the
same process.

A similar scenario can happen in a big.LITTLE configuration if the boot
CPU only uses 8-bit ASIDs while secondary CPUs have 16-bit ASIDs.

Ensure that the ASID generation is only tracked by bits 16 and up,
leaving bits 15:8 as 0 if the kernel uses 8-bit ASIDs. Note that
clearing TCR_EL1.AS is not sufficient since the architecture requires
that the top 8 bits of the ASID passed to TLBI instructions are 0 rather
than ignored in such configuration.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241203151941.353796-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...