Searched hist:"8 a13695c" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/jffs2/ |
| H A D | xattr.h | 8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | xattr.c | 8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|
| H A D | scan.c | 8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
8a13695c Fri Jun 23 19:14:13 CDT 2006 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> [JFFS2][XATTR] rid unnecessary writing of delete marker.
In the followinf situation, an explicit delete marker is not
necessary, because we can certainlly detect those obsolete
xattr_datum or xattr_ref on next mounting.
- When to delete xattr_datum node.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on removing inode.
- When to delete xattr_ref node on updating xattr.
This patch rids writing delete marker in those situations.
Signed-off-by: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
|