Searched hist:"33 c66f43" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | relocation.c | 33c66f43 Wed Jul 22 08:59:00 CDT 2009 Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> Btrfs: fix locking issue in btrfs_find_next_key
When walking up the tree, btrfs_find_next_key assumes the upper level tree
block is properly locked. This isn't always true even path->keep_locks is 1.
This is because btrfs_find_next_key may advance path->slots[] several times
instead of only once.
When 'path->slots[level] >= btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level])' is found,
we can't guarantee the original value of 'path->slots[level]' is
'btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level]) - 1'. If it's not, the tree block at
'level + 1' isn't locked.
This patch fixes the issue by explicitly checking the locking state,
re-searching the tree if it's not locked.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
33c66f43 Wed Jul 22 08:59:00 CDT 2009 Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> Btrfs: fix locking issue in btrfs_find_next_key
When walking up the tree, btrfs_find_next_key assumes the upper level tree
block is properly locked. This isn't always true even path->keep_locks is 1.
This is because btrfs_find_next_key may advance path->slots[] several times
instead of only once.
When 'path->slots[level] >= btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level])' is found,
we can't guarantee the original value of 'path->slots[level]' is
'btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level]) - 1'. If it's not, the tree block at
'level + 1' isn't locked.
This patch fixes the issue by explicitly checking the locking state,
re-searching the tree if it's not locked.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | ctree.c | 33c66f43 Wed Jul 22 08:59:00 CDT 2009 Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com> Btrfs: fix locking issue in btrfs_find_next_key
When walking up the tree, btrfs_find_next_key assumes the upper level tree
block is properly locked. This isn't always true even path->keep_locks is 1.
This is because btrfs_find_next_key may advance path->slots[] several times
instead of only once.
When 'path->slots[level] >= btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level])' is found,
we can't guarantee the original value of 'path->slots[level]' is
'btrfs_header_nritems(path->nodes[level]) - 1'. If it's not, the tree block at
'level + 1' isn't locked.
This patch fixes the issue by explicitly checking the locking state,
re-searching the tree if it's not locked.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zheng <zheng.yan@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
|