History log of /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c (Results 1 – 25 of 155)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43
# f9bff0e3 02-Aug-2023 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>

minmax: add in_range() macro

Patch series "New page table range API", v6.

This patchset changes the API used by the MM to set up page table entries.
The four APIs are:

set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep,

minmax: add in_range() macro

Patch series "New page table range API", v6.

This patchset changes the API used by the MM to set up page table entries.
The four APIs are:

set_ptes(mm, addr, ptep, pte, nr)
update_mmu_cache_range(vma, addr, ptep, nr)
flush_dcache_folio(folio)
flush_icache_pages(vma, page, nr)

flush_dcache_folio() isn't technically new, but no architecture
implemented it, so I've done that for them. The old APIs remain around
but are mostly implemented by calling the new interfaces.

The new APIs are based around setting up N page table entries at once.
The N entries belong to the same PMD, the same folio and the same VMA, so
ptep++ is a legitimate operation, and locking is taken care of for you.
Some architectures can do a better job of it than just a loop, but I have
hesitated to make too deep a change to architectures I don't understand
well.

One thing I have changed in every architecture is that PG_arch_1 is now a
per-folio bit instead of a per-page bit when used for dcache clean/dirty
tracking. This was something that would have to happen eventually, and it
makes sense to do it now rather than iterate over every page involved in a
cache flush and figure out if it needs to happen.

The point of all this is better performance, and Fengwei Yin has measured
improvement on x86. I suspect you'll see improvement on your architecture
too. Try the new will-it-scale test mentioned here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230206140639.538867-5-fengwei.yin@intel.com/
You'll need to run it on an XFS filesystem and have
CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE set.

This patchset is the basis for much of the anonymous large folio work
being done by Ryan, so it's received quite a lot of testing over the last
few months.


This patch (of 38):

Determine if a value lies within a range more efficiently (subtraction +
comparison vs two comparisons and an AND). It also has useful (under some
circumstances) behaviour if the range exceeds the maximum value of the
type. Convert all the conflicting definitions of in_range() within the
kernel; some can use the generic definition while others need their own
definition.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802151406.3735276-1-willy@infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802151406.3735276-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

show more ...


# 3136a0f8 03-Aug-2023 Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Fix GMU lockdep splat

For normal GPU devfreq, we need to acquire the GMU lock while already
holding devfreq locks. But in the teardown path, we were calling
dev_pm_domain_detach() whi

drm/msm/a6xx: Fix GMU lockdep splat

For normal GPU devfreq, we need to acquire the GMU lock while already
holding devfreq locks. But in the teardown path, we were calling
dev_pm_domain_detach() while already holding the GMU lock, resulting in
this lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.4.3-debug+ #3 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
ring0/391 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffff80a025c078 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: qos_notifier_call+0x30/0x74

but task is already holding lock:
ffffff809b8c1ce8 (&(c->notifiers)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x78

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #4 (&(c->notifiers)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write+0x58/0x74
__blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x64/0x84
blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x1c/0x28
freq_qos_add_notifier+0x5c/0x7c
dev_pm_qos_add_notifier+0xd4/0xf0
devfreq_add_device+0x42c/0x560
devm_devfreq_add_device+0x6c/0xb8
msm_devfreq_init+0xa8/0x16c [msm]
msm_gpu_init+0x368/0x54c [msm]
adreno_gpu_init+0x248/0x2b0 [msm]
a6xx_gpu_init+0x2d0/0x384 [msm]
adreno_bind+0x264/0x2bc [msm]
component_bind_all+0x124/0x1f4
msm_drm_bind+0x2d0/0x5f4 [msm]
try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4
__component_add+0xd4/0x128
component_add+0x1c/0x28
dp_display_probe+0x37c/0x3c0 [msm]
platform_probe+0x70/0xc0
really_probe+0x148/0x280
__driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x114
driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100
__device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc
bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8
__device_attach+0xe4/0x140
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0
deferred_probe_work_func+0xb0/0xc8
process_one_work+0x288/0x3d8
worker_thread+0x1f0/0x260
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

-> #3 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x388
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
dev_pm_qos_remove_notifier+0x3c/0xc8
genpd_remove_device+0x40/0x11c
genpd_dev_pm_detach+0x88/0x130
dev_pm_domain_detach+0x2c/0x3c
a6xx_gmu_remove+0x44/0xdc [msm]
a6xx_destroy+0x7c/0xa4 [msm]
adreno_unbind+0x50/0x64 [msm]
component_unbind+0x44/0x64
component_unbind_all+0xb4/0xbc
msm_drm_uninit.isra.0+0x124/0x17c [msm]
msm_drm_bind+0x340/0x5f4 [msm]
try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x88/0x1a4
__component_add+0xd4/0x128
component_add+0x1c/0x28
dp_display_probe+0x37c/0x3c0 [msm]
platform_probe+0x70/0xc0
really_probe+0x148/0x280
__driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x114
driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100
__device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc
bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8
__device_attach+0xe4/0x140
device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28
bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0
deferred_probe_work_func+0xb0/0xc8
process_one_work+0x288/0x3d8
worker_thread+0x1f0/0x260
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

-> #2 (&a6xx_gpu->gmu.lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x388
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
a6xx_gpu_set_freq+0x38/0x64 [msm]
msm_devfreq_target+0x170/0x18c [msm]
devfreq_set_target+0x90/0x1e4
devfreq_update_target+0xb4/0xf0
update_devfreq+0x1c/0x28
devfreq_monitor+0x3c/0x10c
process_one_work+0x288/0x3d8
worker_thread+0x1f0/0x260
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

-> #1 (&df->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x388
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
msm_devfreq_get_dev_status+0x4c/0x104 [msm]
devfreq_simple_ondemand_func+0x5c/0x128
devfreq_update_target+0x68/0xf0
update_devfreq+0x1c/0x28
devfreq_monitor+0x3c/0x10c
process_one_work+0x288/0x3d8
worker_thread+0x1f0/0x260
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

-> #0 (&devfreq->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c
lock_acquire+0x234/0x284
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x388
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
qos_notifier_call+0x30/0x74
qos_min_notifier_call+0x1c/0x28
notifier_call_chain+0xf4/0x114
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x78
pm_qos_update_target+0x184/0x190
freq_qos_apply+0x4c/0x64
apply_constraint+0xf8/0xfc
__dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x138/0x164
dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x44/0x68
msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 [msm]
msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 [msm]
msm_gpu_submit+0xc8/0x12c [msm]
msm_job_run+0x88/0x128 [msm]
drm_sched_main+0x240/0x324 [gpu_sched]
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&devfreq->lock --> dev_pm_qos_mtx --> &(c->notifiers)->rwsem
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
rlock(&(c->notifiers)->rwsem);
lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx);
lock(&(c->notifiers)->rwsem);
lock(&devfreq->lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by ring0/391:
#0: ffffff809c811170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x7c/0x128 [msm]
#1: ffffff809c811208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xa8/0x12c [msm]
#2: ffffffecbbb46600 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68
#3: ffffff809b8c1ce8 (&(c->notifiers)->rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x34/0x78

stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 391 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.4.3debug+ #3
Hardware name: Google Villager (rev1+) with LTE (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0xb4/0xf0
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
print_circular_bug+0x1cc/0x234
check_noncircular+0x78/0xac
__lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c
lock_acquire+0x234/0x284
__mutex_lock+0xc8/0x388
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
qos_notifier_call+0x30/0x74
qos_min_notifier_call+0x1c/0x28
notifier_call_chain+0xf4/0x114
blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x4c/0x78
pm_qos_update_target+0x184/0x190
freq_qos_apply+0x4c/0x64
apply_constraint+0xf8/0xfc
__dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x138/0x164
dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x44/0x68
msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 [msm]
msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 [msm]
msm_gpu_submit+0xc8/0x12c [msm]
msm_job_run+0x88/0x128 [msm]
drm_sched_main+0x240/0x324 [gpu_sched]
kthread+0xf0/0x100
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Fix this by only synchronizing access to gmu->initialized.

Fixes: 4cd15a3e8b36 ("drm/msm/a6xx: Make GPU destroy a bit safer")
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/551171/

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35
# 1bfa7951 20-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Fix up GMU region reservations

Change the order of region allocations to make the addresses match
downstream. This shouldn't matter very much, but helps eliminate one
more difference w

drm/msm/a6xx: Fix up GMU region reservations

Change the order of region allocations to make the addresses match
downstream. This shouldn't matter very much, but helps eliminate one
more difference when comparing register accesses.

Also, make the log region 16K long. That's what it is, unconditionally
on A6xx and A7xx.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/543338/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 6ab410e0 20-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Improve GMU force shutdown sequence

The GMU force shutdown sequence involves some additional register cleanup
which was not implemented previously. Do so.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio

drm/msm/a6xx: Improve GMU force shutdown sequence

The GMU force shutdown sequence involves some additional register cleanup
which was not implemented previously. Do so.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/543340/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 5e46ad83 20-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Ensure clean GMU state in a6xx_gmu_fw_start

While it's not very well understood, there is some sort of a fault
handler implemented in the GMU firmware which triggers when a certain
bit

drm/msm/a6xx: Ensure clean GMU state in a6xx_gmu_fw_start

While it's not very well understood, there is some sort of a fault
handler implemented in the GMU firmware which triggers when a certain
bit is set, resulting in the M3 core not booting up the way we expect
it to.

Write a magic value to a magic register to hopefully prevent that
from happening.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/543335/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 90b593ce 27-Jul-2023 Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

drm/msm/adreno: Switch to chip-id for identifying GPU

Since the revision becomes an opaque identifier with future GPUs, move
away from treating different ranges of bits as having a given meaning.
Th

drm/msm/adreno: Switch to chip-id for identifying GPU

Since the revision becomes an opaque identifier with future GPUs, move
away from treating different ranges of bits as having a given meaning.
This means that we need to explicitly list different patch revisions in
the device table.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/549782/

show more ...


# 75a5227c 27-Jul-2023 Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

drm/msm/adreno: Bring the a630 family together

All of these are derivatives of a630.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwor

drm/msm/adreno: Bring the a630 family together

All of these are derivatives of a630.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/549770/

show more ...


# 722d4f06 14-Jul-2023 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that mer

drm: Explicitly include correct DT includes

The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230714174545.4056287-1-robh@kernel.org

show more ...


# 5a903a44 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
the GMU directl

drm/msm/a6xx: Introduce GMU wrapper support

Some (particularly SMD_RPM, a.k.a non-RPMh) SoCs implement A6XX GPUs
but don't implement the associated GMUs. This is due to the fact that
the GMU directly pokes at RPMh. Sadly, this means we have to take care
of enabling & scaling power rails, clocks and bandwidth ourselves.

Reuse existing Adreno-common code and modify the deeply-GMU-infused
A6XX code to facilitate these GPUs. This involves if-ing out lots
of GMU callbacks and introducing a new type of GMU - GMU wrapper (it's
the actual name that Qualcomm uses in their downstream kernels).

This is essentially a register region which is convenient to model
as a device. We'll use it for managing the GDSCs. The register
layout matches the actual GMU_CX/GX regions on the "real GMU" devices
and lets us reuse quite a bit of gmu_read/write/rmw calls.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542766/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 30f55f3f 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Move CX GMU power counter enablement to hw_init

Since the introduction of A6xx support, we've been enabling the CX GMU
power counter 0 in a bit of a weird spot. Move it to hw_init so t

drm/msm/a6xx: Move CX GMU power counter enablement to hw_init

Since the introduction of A6xx support, we've been enabling the CX GMU
power counter 0 in a bit of a weird spot. Move it to hw_init so that
GMU wrapper GPUs can reuse the same code paths. As a bonus, this order
makes it easier to compare mainline and downstream register access traces.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542765/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 277b9678 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Add a helper for software-resetting the GPU

Introduce a6xx_gpu_sw_reset() in preparation for adding GMU wrapper
GPUs and reuse it in a6xx_gmu_force_off().

This helper, contrary to the

drm/msm/a6xx: Add a helper for software-resetting the GPU

Introduce a6xx_gpu_sw_reset() in preparation for adding GMU wrapper
GPUs and reuse it in a6xx_gmu_force_off().

This helper, contrary to the original usage in GMU code paths, adds
a readback+delay sequence to ensure that the reset is never deasserted
too quickly due to e.g. OoO execution going crazy.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542758/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 6e332c99 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Move a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions to a6xx_gpu

This function is responsible for telling the GPU to halt transactions
on all of its relevant buses, drain them and leave them in a

drm/msm/a6xx: Move a6xx_bus_clear_pending_transactions to a6xx_gpu

This function is responsible for telling the GPU to halt transactions
on all of its relevant buses, drain them and leave them in a predictable
state, so that the GPU can be e.g. reset cleanly.

Move the function to a6xx_gpu.c, remove the static keyword and add a
prototype in a6xx_gpu.h to accomodate for the move.

Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542762/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# ce8f1381 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Move force keepalive vote removal to a6xx_gmu_force_off()

As pointed out by Akhil during the review process of GMU wrapper
introduction [1], it makes sense to move this write into the

drm/msm/a6xx: Move force keepalive vote removal to a6xx_gmu_force_off()

As pointed out by Akhil during the review process of GMU wrapper
introduction [1], it makes sense to move this write into the function
that's responsible for forcibly shutting the GMU off.

It is also very convenient to move this to GMU-specific code, so that
it does not have to be guarded by an if-condition to avoid calling it
on GMU wrapper targets.

Move the write to the aforementioned a6xx_gmu_force_off() to achieve
that. No effective functional change.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230501194022.GA18382@akhilpo-linux.qualcomm.com/

Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542752/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# bd31afe0 15-Jun-2023 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Remove static keyword from sptprac en/disable functions

These two will be reused by at least A619_holi in the non-gmu
paths. Turn them non-static them to make it possible.

Reviewed-by

drm/msm/a6xx: Remove static keyword from sptprac en/disable functions

These two will be reused by at least A619_holi in the non-gmu
paths. Turn them non-static them to make it possible.

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/542751/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24
# 12abd735 10-Apr-2023 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: initialize GMU mutex earlier

Move GMU mutex initialization earlier to make sure that it is always
initialized. a6xx_destroy can be called from ther failure path before
GMU initializati

drm/msm/a6xx: initialize GMU mutex earlier

Move GMU mutex initialization earlier to make sure that it is always
initialized. a6xx_destroy can be called from ther failure path before
GMU initialization.

This fixes the following backtrace:

------------[ cut here ]------------
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(lock->magic != lock)
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 58 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:582 __mutex_lock+0x1ec/0x3d0
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc5-00155-g187c06436519 #565
Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8350 HDK (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : __mutex_lock+0x1ec/0x3d0
lr : __mutex_lock+0x1ec/0x3d0
sp : ffff800008993620
x29: ffff800008993620 x28: 0000000000000002 x27: ffff47b253c52800
x26: 0000000001000606 x25: ffff47b240bb2810 x24: fffffffffffffff4
x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffc38bba15ac14 x21: 0000000000000002
x20: ffff800008993690 x19: ffff47b2430cc668 x18: fffffffffffe98f0
x17: 6f74616c75676572 x16: 20796d6d75642067 x15: 0000000000000038
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffffc38bbba050b8 x12: 0000000000000666
x11: 0000000000000222 x10: ffffc38bbba603e8 x9 : ffffc38bbba050b8
x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffffc38bbba5d0b8 x6 : 0000000000000222
x5 : 000000000000bff4 x4 : 40000000fffff222 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff47b240cb1880
Call trace:
__mutex_lock+0x1ec/0x3d0
mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38
a6xx_destroy+0xa0/0x138
a6xx_gpu_init+0x41c/0x618
adreno_bind+0x188/0x290
component_bind_all+0x118/0x248
msm_drm_bind+0x1c0/0x670
try_to_bring_up_aggregate_device+0x164/0x1d0
__component_add+0xa8/0x16c
component_add+0x14/0x20
dsi_dev_attach+0x20/0x2c
dsi_host_attach+0x9c/0x144
devm_mipi_dsi_attach+0x34/0xac
lt9611uxc_attach_dsi.isra.0+0x84/0xfc
lt9611uxc_probe+0x5b8/0x67c
i2c_device_probe+0x1ac/0x358
really_probe+0x148/0x2ac
__driver_probe_device+0x78/0xe0
driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x160
__device_attach_driver+0xb8/0x138
bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
__device_attach+0x9c/0x188
device_initial_probe+0x14/0x20
bus_probe_device+0xac/0xb0
deferred_probe_work_func+0x8c/0xc8
process_one_work+0x2bc/0x594
worker_thread+0x228/0x438
kthread+0x108/0x10c
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
irq event stamp: 299345
hardirqs last enabled at (299345): [<ffffc38bb9ba61e4>] put_cpu_partial+0x1c8/0x22c
hardirqs last disabled at (299344): [<ffffc38bb9ba61dc>] put_cpu_partial+0x1c0/0x22c
softirqs last enabled at (296752): [<ffffc38bb9890434>] _stext+0x434/0x4e8
softirqs last disabled at (296741): [<ffffc38bb989669c>] ____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: 4cd15a3e8b36 ("drm/msm/a6xx: Make GPU destroy a bit safer")
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/531540/
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21
# 8559da8f 20-Mar-2023 Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Move ioremap out of hw_init path

Move the one-time RPMh setup to a6xx_gmu_init(). To get rid of the hack
for one-time init vs start, add in an extra a6xx_rpmh_stop() at the end
of the

drm/msm/a6xx: Move ioremap out of hw_init path

Move the one-time RPMh setup to a6xx_gmu_init(). To get rid of the hack
for one-time init vs start, add in an extra a6xx_rpmh_stop() at the end
of the init sequence.

Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/527854/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230320144356.803762-15-robdclark@gmail.com

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17
# c11fa120 02-Jan-2023 Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>

drm/msm/a6xx: Use genpd notifier to ensure cx-gdsc collapse

As per the recommended recovery sequence of adreno gpu, cx gdsc should
collapse at hardware before it is turned back ON. This helps to cle

drm/msm/a6xx: Use genpd notifier to ensure cx-gdsc collapse

As per the recommended recovery sequence of adreno gpu, cx gdsc should
collapse at hardware before it is turned back ON. This helps to clear
out the stale states in hardware before it is reinitialized. Use the
genpd notifier along with the newly introduced
dev_pm_genpd_synced_poweroff() api to ensure that cx gdsc has collapsed
before we turn it back ON.

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/516472/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102161757.v5.5.I9e10545c6a448d5eb1b734839b871d1b3146dac3@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# ead5d3e5 02-Jan-2023 Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>

drm/msm/a6xx: Vote for cx gdsc from gpu driver

When a device has multiple power domains, dev->power_domain is left
empty during probe. That didn't cause any issue so far because we are
freeloading o

drm/msm/a6xx: Vote for cx gdsc from gpu driver

When a device has multiple power domains, dev->power_domain is left
empty during probe. That didn't cause any issue so far because we are
freeloading on smmu driver's vote on cx gdsc. Instead of that, create
a device_link between cx genpd device and gmu device to keep a vote from
gpu driver.

Before this patch:
localhost ~ # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
gx_gdsc on 0
/devices/genpd:1:3d6a000.gmu active 0
cx_gdsc on 0
/devices/platform/soc@0/3da0000.iommu active 0

After this patch:
localhost ~ # cat /sys/kernel/debug/pm_genpd/pm_genpd_summary
gx_gdsc on 0
/devices/genpd:1:3d6a000.gmu active 0
cx_gdsc on 0
/devices/platform/soc@0/3da0000.iommu active 0
/devices/genpd:0:3d6a000.gmu active 0

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/516468/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230102161757.v5.3.I7f545d8494dcdbe6e96a15fbe8aaf5bb0c003d50@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 4cd15a3e 02-Feb-2023 Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>

drm/msm/a6xx: Make GPU destroy a bit safer

If, for whatever reason, we're trying process adreno_runtime_resume()
at the same time that a6xx_destroy() is running then things can go
boom. Specifically

drm/msm/a6xx: Make GPU destroy a bit safer

If, for whatever reason, we're trying process adreno_runtime_resume()
at the same time that a6xx_destroy() is running then things can go
boom. Specifically adreno_runtime_resume() will eventually call
a6xx_pm_resume() and that may try to resume the gmu.

Let's grab the GMU lock as we're destroying the GMU. That will solve
the race because a6xx_pm_resume() grabs the same lock. That makes the
access of `gmu->initialized` in a6xx_gmu_resume() safe.

We'll also return an error code in a6xx_gmu_resume() if we see that
`gmu->initialized` was false. If this happens we'll bail out of the
rest of a6xx_pm_resume(), which is good because the rest of that
function is also not good to do if we're racing with a6xx_destroy().

Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/521232/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230202104822.1.I0e49003bf4dd1dead9be4a29dbee41f3b1236e48@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14
# f4a75b59 16-Dec-2022 Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>

drm/msm/a6xx: Avoid gx gbit halt during rpm suspend

As per the downstream driver, gx gbif halt is required only during
recovery sequence. So lets avoid it during regular rpm suspend.

Signed-off-by:

drm/msm/a6xx: Avoid gx gbit halt during rpm suspend

As per the downstream driver, gx gbif halt is required only during
recovery sequence. So lets avoid it during regular rpm suspend.

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/515279/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221216223253.1.Ice9c47bfeb1fddb8dc377a3491a043a3ee7fca7d@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77
# 3236130b 02-Nov-2022 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

drm/msm: move domain allocation into msm_iommu_new()

After the msm_iommu instance is created, the IOMMU domain is completely
handled inside the msm_iommu code. Move the iommu_domain_alloc() call
int

drm/msm: move domain allocation into msm_iommu_new()

After the msm_iommu instance is created, the IOMMU domain is completely
handled inside the msm_iommu code. Move the iommu_domain_alloc() call
into the msm_iommu_new() to simplify callers code.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/509615/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221102175449.452283-2-dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62
# d6463fd4 18-Aug-2022 Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>

drm/msm/a6xx: Handle GMU prepare-slumber hfi failure

When prepare-slumber hfi fails, we should follow a6xx_gmu_force_off()
sequence.

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Patchwo

drm/msm/a6xx: Handle GMU prepare-slumber hfi failure

When prepare-slumber hfi fails, we should follow a6xx_gmu_force_off()
sequence.

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/498401/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819015030.v5.7.I54815c7c36b80d4725cd054e536365250454452f@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 3a9dd708 18-Aug-2022 Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>

drm/msm/a6xx: Improve gpu recovery sequence

We can do a few more things to improve our chance at a successful gpu
recovery, especially during a hangcheck timeout:
1. Halt CP and GMU core
2. Do RBBM

drm/msm/a6xx: Improve gpu recovery sequence

We can do a few more things to improve our chance at a successful gpu
recovery, especially during a hangcheck timeout:
1. Halt CP and GMU core
2. Do RBBM GBIF HALT sequence
3. Do a soft reset of GPU core

Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/498400/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220819015030.v5.6.Idf2ba51078e87ae7ceb75cc77a5bd4ff2bd31eab@changeid
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53
# d7499634 06-Jul-2022 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

drm/msm/adreno: Do not propagate void return values

With sparse ("make C=2"), lots of

error: return expression in void function

messages are seen.

Fix this by removing the return statements to

drm/msm/adreno: Do not propagate void return values

With sparse ("make C=2"), lots of

error: return expression in void function

messages are seen.

Fix this by removing the return statements to propagate void return
values.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/492529/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0083bc7e23753c19902580b902582ae499b44dbf.1657113388.git.geert@linux-m68k.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44
# b7616b5c 28-May-2022 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>

drm/msm/adreno: Add A619 support

Add support for the Adreno 619 GPU, as found in Snapdragon 690 (SM6350),
480 (SM4350) and 750G (SM7225).

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>

drm/msm/adreno: Add A619 support

Add support for the Adreno 619 GPU, as found in Snapdragon 690 (SM6350),
480 (SM4350) and 750G (SM7225).

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>
Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/487588/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220528160353.157870-2-konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

show more ...


1234567