Searched hist:fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/netfs/ |
| H A D | buffered_read.c | diff fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 Sun Jul 10 23:11:21 CDT 2022 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
Change the way ->check_write_begin() works in the following two ways:
(1) Pass it a pointer to the folio pointer, allowing it to unlock and put
the folio prior to doing the stuff it wants to do, provided it clears
the folio pointer.
(2) Change the return values such that 0 with folio pointer set means
continue, 0 with folio pointer cleared means re-get and all error
codes indicating an error (no special treatment for -EAGAIN).
[ bagasdotme: use Sphinx code text syntax for *foliop pointer ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/Documentation/filesystems/ |
| H A D | netfs_library.rst | diff fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 Sun Jul 10 23:11:21 CDT 2022 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
Change the way ->check_write_begin() works in the following two ways:
(1) Pass it a pointer to the folio pointer, allowing it to unlock and put
the folio prior to doing the stuff it wants to do, provided it clears
the folio pointer.
(2) Change the return values such that 0 with folio pointer set means
continue, 0 with folio pointer cleared means re-get and all error
codes indicating an error (no special treatment for -EAGAIN).
[ bagasdotme: use Sphinx code text syntax for *foliop pointer ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | netfs.h | diff fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 Sun Jul 10 23:11:21 CDT 2022 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
Change the way ->check_write_begin() works in the following two ways:
(1) Pass it a pointer to the folio pointer, allowing it to unlock and put
the folio prior to doing the stuff it wants to do, provided it clears
the folio pointer.
(2) Change the return values such that 0 with folio pointer set means
continue, 0 with folio pointer cleared means re-get and all error
codes indicating an error (no special treatment for -EAGAIN).
[ bagasdotme: use Sphinx code text syntax for *foliop pointer ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/afs/ |
| H A D | file.c | diff fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 Sun Jul 10 23:11:21 CDT 2022 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
Change the way ->check_write_begin() works in the following two ways:
(1) Pass it a pointer to the folio pointer, allowing it to unlock and put
the folio prior to doing the stuff it wants to do, provided it clears
the folio pointer.
(2) Change the return values such that 0 with folio pointer set means
continue, 0 with folio pointer cleared means re-get and all error
codes indicating an error (no special treatment for -EAGAIN).
[ bagasdotme: use Sphinx code text syntax for *foliop pointer ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ceph/ |
| H A D | addr.c | diff fac47b43c760ea90e64b895dba60df0327be7775 Sun Jul 10 23:11:21 CDT 2022 Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com> netfs: do not unlock and put the folio twice
check_write_begin() will unlock and put the folio when return
non-zero. So we should avoid unlocking and putting it twice in
netfs layer.
Change the way ->check_write_begin() works in the following two ways:
(1) Pass it a pointer to the folio pointer, allowing it to unlock and put
the folio prior to doing the stuff it wants to do, provided it clears
the folio pointer.
(2) Change the return values such that 0 with folio pointer set means
continue, 0 with folio pointer cleared means re-get and all error
codes indicating an error (no special treatment for -EAGAIN).
[ bagasdotme: use Sphinx code text syntax for *foliop pointer ]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/56423
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf169f43-8ee7-8697-25da-0204d1b4343e@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|