| /openbmc/linux/fs/f2fs/ |
| H A D | verity.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | Kconfig | diff 7f8e249dccc4c530cf26c2c091f5bb64e701c262 Thu Mar 03 15:21:27 CST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: introduce F2FS_UNFAIR_RWSEM to support unfair rwsem
Unfair rwsem should be used when blk-cg is on. Otherwise, there is regression.
FYI, we noticed a -26.7% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
commit: e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae ("f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
in testcase: aim7
on test machine: 88 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6238M CPU @ 2.10GHz with 128G memory
with following parameters:
disk: 4BRD_12G
md: RAID0
fs: f2fs
test: sync_disk_rw
load: 100
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x500320a
test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system.
test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | compress.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | sysfs.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | inline.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | xattr.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | recovery.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | dir.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | namei.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | gc.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | f2fs.h | diff 7f8e249dccc4c530cf26c2c091f5bb64e701c262 Thu Mar 03 15:21:27 CST 2022 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> f2fs: introduce F2FS_UNFAIR_RWSEM to support unfair rwsem
Unfair rwsem should be used when blk-cg is on. Otherwise, there is regression.
FYI, we noticed a -26.7% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit:
commit: e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae ("f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
in testcase: aim7
on test machine: 88 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6238M CPU @ 2.10GHz with 128G memory
with following parameters:
disk: 4BRD_12G
md: RAID0
fs: f2fs
test: sync_disk_rw
load: 100
cpufreq_governor: performance
ucode: 0x500320a
test-description: AIM7 is a traditional UNIX system level benchmark suite which is used to test and measure the performance of multiuser system.
test-url: https://sourceforge.net/projects/aimbench/files/aim-suite7/
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | checkpoint.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | node.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | segment.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | super.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | data.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | file.c | diff e4544b63a7ee49e7fbebf35ece0a6acd3b9617ae Fri Jan 07 14:48:44 CST 2022 Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> f2fs: move f2fs to use reader-unfair rwsems
f2fs rw_semaphores work better if writers can starve readers,
especially for the checkpoint thread, because writers are strictly
more important than reader threads. This prevents significant priority
inversion between low-priority readers that blocked while trying to
acquire the read lock and a second acquisition of the write lock that
might be blocking high priority work.
Signed-off-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
|