Revision tags: v6.6.74 |
|
#
d32fd6bb |
| 22-Jan-2025 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.72' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.72 stable release
|
Revision tags: v6.6.73, v6.6.72, v6.6.71, v6.12.9, v6.6.70, v6.12.8, v6.6.69, v6.12.7, v6.6.68, v6.12.6, v6.6.67, v6.12.5, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.12.4, v6.6.64, v6.12.3, v6.12.2, v6.6.63, v6.12.1, v6.12, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57 |
|
#
8dddc12d |
| 11-Oct-2024 |
Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> |
f2fs: fix null-ptr-deref in f2fs_submit_page_bio()
commit b7d0a97b28083084ebdd8e5c6bccd12e6ec18faa upstream.
There's issue as follows when concurrently installing the f2fs.ko module and mounting th
f2fs: fix null-ptr-deref in f2fs_submit_page_bio()
commit b7d0a97b28083084ebdd8e5c6bccd12e6ec18faa upstream.
There's issue as follows when concurrently installing the f2fs.ko module and mounting the f2fs file system: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000020-0x0000000000000027] RIP: 0010:__bio_alloc+0x2fb/0x6c0 [f2fs] Call Trace: <TASK> f2fs_submit_page_bio+0x126/0x8b0 [f2fs] __get_meta_page+0x1d4/0x920 [f2fs] get_checkpoint_version.constprop.0+0x2b/0x3c0 [f2fs] validate_checkpoint+0xac/0x290 [f2fs] f2fs_get_valid_checkpoint+0x207/0x950 [f2fs] f2fs_fill_super+0x1007/0x39b0 [f2fs] mount_bdev+0x183/0x250 legacy_get_tree+0xf4/0x1e0 vfs_get_tree+0x88/0x340 do_new_mount+0x283/0x5e0 path_mount+0x2b2/0x15b0 __x64_sys_mount+0x1fe/0x270 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
Above issue happens as the biset of the f2fs file system is not initialized before register "f2fs_fs_type". To address above issue just register "f2fs_fs_type" at the last in init_f2fs_fs(). Ensure that all f2fs file system resources are initialized.
Fixes: f543805fcd60 ("f2fs: introduce private bioset") Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bin Lan <lanbincn@qq.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
#
278002ed |
| 15-Dec-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.66' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.66 stable release
|
#
ed24ab98 |
| 21-Nov-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device
[ Upstream commit bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e ]
Piergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:
------------[ cut
f2fs: fix to drop all discards after creating snapshot on lvm device
[ Upstream commit bc8aeb04fd80cb8cfae3058445c84410fd0beb5e ]
Piergiorgio reported a bug in bugzilla as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 969 at fs/f2fs/segment.c:1330 RIP: 0010:__submit_discard_cmd+0x27d/0x400 [f2fs] Call Trace: __issue_discard_cmd+0x1ca/0x350 [f2fs] issue_discard_thread+0x191/0x480 [f2fs] kthread+0xcf/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
w/ below testcase, it can reproduce this bug quickly: - pvcreate /dev/vdb - vgcreate myvg1 /dev/vdb - lvcreate -L 1024m -n mylv1 myvg1 - mount /dev/myvg1/mylv1 /mnt/f2fs - dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/f2fs/file bs=1M count=20 - sync - rm /mnt/f2fs/file - sync - lvcreate -L 1024m -s -n mylv1-snapshot /dev/myvg1/mylv1 - umount /mnt/f2fs
The root cause is: it will update discard_max_bytes of mounted lvm device to zero after creating snapshot on this lvm device, then, __submit_discard_cmd() will pass parameter @nr_sects w/ zero value to __blkdev_issue_discard(), it returns a NULL bio pointer, result in panic.
This patch changes as below for fixing: 1. Let's drop all remained discards in f2fs_unfreeze() if snapshot of lvm device is created. 2. Checking discard_max_bytes before submitting discard during __submit_discard_cmd().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 35ec7d574884 ("f2fs: split discard command in prior to block layer") Reported-by: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@nexgo.de> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219484 Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
ecc23d0a |
| 09-Dec-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.64' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.64 stable release
|
#
ecf4e678 |
| 22-Oct-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason()
[ Upstream commit f10a890308a7cd8794e21f646f09827c6cb4bf5d ]
syzbot reports deadlock issue of f2fs as below:
====================
f2fs: fix to avoid potential deadlock in f2fs_record_stop_reason()
[ Upstream commit f10a890308a7cd8794e21f646f09827c6cb4bf5d ]
syzbot reports deadlock issue of f2fs as below:
====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.12.0-rc3-syzkaller-00087-gc964ced77262 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/79 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] ffff888011824088 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068
but task is already holding lock: ffff88804bd92610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1716 [inline] sb_start_intwrite+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1899 f2fs_evict_inode+0x662/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:842 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
-> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3834 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3848 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline] prepare_alloc_pages+0x147/0x5b0 mm/page_alloc.c:4493 __alloc_pages_noprof+0x16f/0x710 mm/page_alloc.c:4722 alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x3e8/0x680 mm/mempolicy.c:2265 alloc_pages_noprof mm/mempolicy.c:2345 [inline] folio_alloc_noprof+0x128/0x180 mm/mempolicy.c:2352 filemap_alloc_folio_noprof+0xdf/0x500 mm/filemap.c:1010 do_read_cache_folio+0x2eb/0x850 mm/filemap.c:3787 read_mapping_folio include/linux/pagemap.h:1011 [inline] f2fs_commit_super+0x3c0/0x7d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4032 f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x13b/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4079 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_write_inode+0x35f/0x4d0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:785 write_inode fs/fs-writeback.c:1503 [inline] __writeback_single_inode+0x711/0x10d0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1723 writeback_single_inode+0x1f3/0x660 fs/fs-writeback.c:1779 sync_inode_metadata+0xc4/0x120 fs/fs-writeback.c:2849 f2fs_release_file+0xa8/0x100 fs/f2fs/file.c:1941 __fput+0x23f/0x880 fs/file_table.c:431 task_work_run+0x24f/0x310 kernel/task_work.c:228 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:328 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x168/0x370 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0x100/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
-> #0 (&sbi->sb_lock){++++}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 down_write+0x99/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1577 f2fs_down_write fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:2199 [inline] f2fs_record_stop_reason+0x52/0x1d0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4068 f2fs_handle_critical_error+0x2ac/0x5c0 fs/f2fs/super.c:4174 f2fs_evict_inode+0xa61/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:883 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 f2fs_evict_inode+0x1a4/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:807 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 dispose_list fs/inode.c:774 [inline] prune_icache_sb+0x239/0x2f0 fs/inode.c:963 super_cache_scan+0x38c/0x4b0 fs/super.c:223 do_shrink_slab+0x701/0x1160 mm/shrinker.c:435 shrink_slab+0x1093/0x14d0 mm/shrinker.c:662 shrink_one+0x43b/0x850 mm/vmscan.c:4818 shrink_many mm/vmscan.c:4879 [inline] lru_gen_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:4957 [inline] shrink_node+0x3799/0x3de0 mm/vmscan.c:5937 kswapd_shrink_node mm/vmscan.c:6765 [inline] balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6957 [inline] kswapd+0x1ca3/0x3700 mm/vmscan.c:7226 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of: &sbi->sb_lock --> fs_reclaim --> sb_internal#2
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_internal#2); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(sb_internal#2); lock(&sbi->sb_lock);
Root cause is there will be potential deadlock in between below tasks:
Thread A Kswapd - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write - mnt_want_write_file -- down_read lock A - balance_pgdat - __fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B - shrink_node - prune_icache_sb - dispose_list - f2fs_evict_inode - sb_start_intwrite -- down_read lock A - f2fs_do_sync_file - f2fs_write_inode - f2fs_handle_critical_error - f2fs_record_stop_reason - f2fs_commit_super - read_mapping_folio - filemap_alloc_folio_noprof - fs_reclaim_acquire -- lock B
Both threads try to acquire read lock of lock A, then its upcoming write lock grabber will trigger deadlock.
Let's always create an asynchronous task in f2fs_handle_critical_error() rather than calling f2fs_record_stop_reason() synchronously to avoid this potential deadlock issue.
Fixes: b62e71be2110 ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption") Reported-by: syzbot+be4a9983e95a5e25c8d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6704d667.050a0220.1e4d62.0081.GAE@google.com Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.6.56, v6.6.55 |
|
#
34d6f206 |
| 07-Oct-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.54' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.54 stable release
|
Revision tags: v6.6.54, v6.6.53, v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49, v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46, v6.6.45, v6.6.44, v6.6.43, v6.6.42 |
|
#
56d86516 |
| 24-Jul-2024 |
Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> |
f2fs: avoid potential int overflow in sanity_check_area_boundary()
commit 50438dbc483ca6a133d2bce9d5d6747bcee38371 upstream.
While calculating the end addresses of main area and segment 0, u32 may
f2fs: avoid potential int overflow in sanity_check_area_boundary()
commit 50438dbc483ca6a133d2bce9d5d6747bcee38371 upstream.
While calculating the end addresses of main area and segment 0, u32 may be not enough to hold the result without the danger of int overflow.
Just in case, play it safe and cast one of the operands to a wider type (u64).
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with static analysis tool SVACE.
Fixes: fd694733d523 ("f2fs: cover large section in sanity check of super") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Nikita Zhandarovich <n.zhandarovich@fintech.ru> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
show more ...
|
#
649ec8b3 |
| 09-Sep-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error()
[ Upstream commit 930c6ab93492c4b15436524e704950b364b2930c ]
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]----------
f2fs: fix to don't set SB_RDONLY in f2fs_handle_critical_error()
[ Upstream commit 930c6ab93492c4b15436524e704950b364b2930c ]
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 58 at kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 58 Comm: kworker/1:2 Not tainted 6.10.0-syzkaller-12562-g1722389b0d86 #0 Workqueue: events destroy_super_work RIP: 0010:rcu_sync_dtor+0xcd/0x180 kernel/rcu/sync.c:177 Call Trace: percpu_free_rwsem+0x41/0x80 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:42 destroy_super_work+0xec/0x130 fs/super.c:282 process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3231 [inline] process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3312 worker_thread+0x86d/0xd40 kernel/workqueue.c:3390 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244
As Christian Brauner pointed out [1]: the root cause is f2fs sets SB_RDONLY flag in internal function, rather than setting the flag covered w/ sb->s_umount semaphore via remount procedure, then below race condition causes this bug:
- freeze_super() - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_PAGEFAULT) - sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb->s_flags |= SB_RDONLY - thaw_super - thaw_super_locked - sb_rdonly() is true, so it skips sb_freeze_unlock(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS) - deactivate_locked_super
Since f2fs has almost the same logic as ext4 [2] when handling critical error in filesystem if it mounts w/ errors=remount-ro option: - set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag which indicates filesystem is stopped - record errors to superblock - set SB_RDONLY falg Once we set CP_ERROR_FLAG flag, all writable interfaces can detect the flag and stop any further updates on filesystem. So, it is safe to not set SB_RDONLY flag, let's remove the logic and keep in line w/ ext4 [3].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729-himbeeren-funknetz-96e62f9c7aee@brauner [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240729132721.hxih6ehigadqf7wx@quack3 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20240805201241.27286-1-jack@suse.cz
Fixes: b62e71be2110 ("f2fs: support errors=remount-ro|continue|panic mountoption") Reported-by: syzbot+20d7e439f76bbbd863a7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000b90a8e061e21d12f@google.com/ Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
fc18e655 |
| 29-Jul-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: fix to avoid use-after-free in f2fs_stop_gc_thread()
[ Upstream commit c7f114d864ac91515bb07ac271e9824a20f5ed95 ]
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inlin
f2fs: fix to avoid use-after-free in f2fs_stop_gc_thread()
[ Upstream commit c7f114d864ac91515bb07ac271e9824a20f5ed95 ]
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 print_report+0xe8/0x550 mm/kasan/report.c:491 kasan_report+0x143/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:601 kasan_check_range+0x282/0x290 mm/kasan/generic.c:189 instrument_atomic_read_write include/linux/instrumented.h:96 [inline] atomic_fetch_add_relaxed include/linux/atomic/atomic-instrumented.h:252 [inline] __refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:184 [inline] __refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:241 [inline] refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:258 [inline] get_task_struct include/linux/sched/task.h:118 [inline] kthread_stop+0xca/0x630 kernel/kthread.c:704 f2fs_stop_gc_thread+0x65/0xb0 fs/f2fs/gc.c:210 f2fs_do_shutdown+0x192/0x540 fs/f2fs/file.c:2283 f2fs_ioc_shutdown fs/f2fs/file.c:2325 [inline] __f2fs_ioctl+0x443a/0xbe60 fs/f2fs/file.c:4325 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:907 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:893 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
The root cause is below race condition, it may cause use-after-free issue in sbi->gc_th pointer.
- remount - f2fs_remount - f2fs_stop_gc_thread - kfree(gc_th) - f2fs_ioc_shutdown - f2fs_do_shutdown - f2fs_stop_gc_thread - kthread_stop(gc_th->f2fs_gc_task) : sbi->gc_thread = NULL;
We will call f2fs_do_shutdown() in two paths: - for f2fs_ioc_shutdown() path, we should grab sb->s_umount semaphore for fixing. - for f2fs_shutdown() path, it's safe since caller has already grabbed sb->s_umount semaphore.
Reported-by: syzbot+1a8e2b31f2ac9bd3d148@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/0000000000005c7ccb061e032b9b@google.com Fixes: 7950e9ac638e ("f2fs: stop gc/discard thread after fs shutdown") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.6.41, v6.6.40, v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29, v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23 |
|
#
f2971778 |
| 29-Feb-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: support .shutdown in f2fs_sops
[ Upstream commit ee745e4736fbf33079d0d0808e1343c2280fd59a ]
Support .shutdown callback in f2fs_sops, then, it can be called to shut down the file system when u
f2fs: support .shutdown in f2fs_sops
[ Upstream commit ee745e4736fbf33079d0d0808e1343c2280fd59a ]
Support .shutdown callback in f2fs_sops, then, it can be called to shut down the file system when underlying block device is marked dead.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: c7f114d864ac ("f2fs: fix to avoid use-after-free in f2fs_stop_gc_thread()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
ee1cd504 |
| 12-Jul-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.39' into dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.39 stable release
|
#
44958ca9 |
| 06-May-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()
[ Upstream commit 4ed886b187f47447ad559619c48c086f432d2b77 ]
- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(), let'
f2fs: check validation of fault attrs in f2fs_build_fault_attr()
[ Upstream commit 4ed886b187f47447ad559619c48c086f432d2b77 ]
- It missed to check validation of fault attrs in parse_options(), let's fix to add check condition in f2fs_build_fault_attr(). - Use f2fs_build_fault_attr() in __sbi_store() to clean up code.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
57904291 |
| 27-Jun-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.36' into dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.36 stable release
|
#
1036d3ea |
| 03-Apr-2024 |
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
f2fs: don't set RO when shutting down f2fs
[ Upstream commit 3bdb7f161697e2d5123b89fe1778ef17a44858e7 ]
Shutdown does not check the error of thaw_super due to readonly, which causes a deadlock like
f2fs: don't set RO when shutting down f2fs
[ Upstream commit 3bdb7f161697e2d5123b89fe1778ef17a44858e7 ]
Shutdown does not check the error of thaw_super due to readonly, which causes a deadlock like below.
f2fs_ioc_shutdown(F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC) issue_discard_thread - bdev_freeze - freeze_super - f2fs_stop_checkpoint() - f2fs_handle_critical_error - sb_start_write - set RO - waiting - bdev_thaw - thaw_super_locked - return -EINVAL, if sb_rdonly() - f2fs_stop_discard_thread -> wait for kthread_stop(discard_thread);
Reported-by: "Light Hsieh (謝明燈)" <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
eddeb8d9 |
| 26-Mar-2024 |
Yunlei He <heyunlei@oppo.com> |
f2fs: remove clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag in default_options
[ Upstream commit ac5eecf481c29942eb9a862e758c0c8b68090c33 ]
In f2fs_remount, SB_INLINECRYPT flag will be clear and re-set. If create new f
f2fs: remove clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag in default_options
[ Upstream commit ac5eecf481c29942eb9a862e758c0c8b68090c33 ]
In f2fs_remount, SB_INLINECRYPT flag will be clear and re-set. If create new file or open file during this gap, these files will not use inlinecrypt. Worse case, it may lead to data corruption if wrappedkey_v0 is enable.
Thread A: Thread B:
-f2fs_remount -f2fs_file_open or f2fs_new_inode -default_options <- clear SB_INLINECRYPT flag
-fscrypt_select_encryption_impl
-parse_options <- set SB_INLINECRYPT again
Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@oppo.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
b181f702 |
| 12-Jun-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.33' into dev-6.6
This is the 6.6.33 stable release
|
#
5f8e5a09 |
| 06-Feb-2024 |
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
f2fs: deprecate io_bits
[ Upstream commit 87161a2b0aed9e9b614bbf6fe8697ad560ceb0cb ]
Let's deprecate an unused io_bits feature to save CPU cycles and memory.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@g
f2fs: deprecate io_bits
[ Upstream commit 87161a2b0aed9e9b614bbf6fe8697ad560ceb0cb ]
Let's deprecate an unused io_bits feature to save CPU cycles and memory.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: 043c832371cd ("f2fs: compress: fix error path of inc_valid_block_count()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
066cec37 |
| 20-Feb-2024 |
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
f2fs: kill heap-based allocation
[ Upstream commit 4e0197f9932f70cc7be8744aa0ed4dd9b5d97d85 ]
No one uses this feature. Let's kill it.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by:
f2fs: kill heap-based allocation
[ Upstream commit 4e0197f9932f70cc7be8744aa0ed4dd9b5d97d85 ]
No one uses this feature. Let's kill it.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: aa4074e8fec4 ("f2fs: fix block migration when section is not aligned to pow2") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
f0248ba6 |
| 06-Feb-2024 |
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> |
f2fs: use BLKS_PER_SEG, BLKS_PER_SEC, and SEGS_PER_SEC
[ Upstream commit a60108f7dfb5867da1ad9c777d2fbbe47e4dbdd7 ]
No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-
f2fs: use BLKS_PER_SEG, BLKS_PER_SEC, and SEGS_PER_SEC
[ Upstream commit a60108f7dfb5867da1ad9c777d2fbbe47e4dbdd7 ]
No functional change.
Reviewed-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: aa4074e8fec4 ("f2fs: fix block migration when section is not aligned to pow2") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.6.16, v6.6.15 |
|
#
42d48304 |
| 26-Jan-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: support printk_ratelimited() in f2fs_printk()
[ Upstream commit b1c9d3f833ba60a288db111d7fe38edfeb9b8fbb ]
This patch supports using printk_ratelimited() in f2fs_printk(), and wrap ratelimite
f2fs: support printk_ratelimited() in f2fs_printk()
[ Upstream commit b1c9d3f833ba60a288db111d7fe38edfeb9b8fbb ]
This patch supports using printk_ratelimited() in f2fs_printk(), and wrap ratelimited f2fs_printk() into f2fs_{err,warn,info}_ratelimited(), then, use these new helps to clean up codes.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Stable-dep-of: aa4074e8fec4 ("f2fs: fix block migration when section is not aligned to pow2") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
5ee9cd06 |
| 27-Mar-2024 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> |
Merge tag 'v6.6.23' into dev-6.6
Linux 6.6.23
|
#
b386f5dd |
| 07-Mar-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: zone: fix to remove pow2 check condition for zoned block device
[ Upstream commit 11bec96afbfbc4679863db55258de440d786821e ]
Commit 2e2c6e9b72ce ("f2fs: remove power-of-two limitation of zone
f2fs: zone: fix to remove pow2 check condition for zoned block device
[ Upstream commit 11bec96afbfbc4679863db55258de440d786821e ]
Commit 2e2c6e9b72ce ("f2fs: remove power-of-two limitation of zoned device") missed to remove pow2 check condition in init_blkz_info(), fix it.
Fixes: 2e2c6e9b72ce ("f2fs: remove power-of-two limitation of zoned device") Signed-off-by: Feng Song <songfeng@oppo.com> Signed-off-by: Yongpeng Yang <yangyongpeng1@oppo.com> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
9deb2010 |
| 12-Feb-2024 |
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> |
f2fs: compress: fix to check zstd compress level correctly in mount option
[ Upstream commit e39602da752cd1d0462e3fa04074146f6f2803f6 ]
f2fs only support to config zstd compress level w/ a positive
f2fs: compress: fix to check zstd compress level correctly in mount option
[ Upstream commit e39602da752cd1d0462e3fa04074146f6f2803f6 ]
f2fs only support to config zstd compress level w/ a positive number due to layout design, but since commit e0c1b49f5b67 ("lib: zstd: Upgrade to latest upstream zstd version 1.4.10"), zstd supports negative compress level, so that zstd_min_clevel() may return a negative number, then w/ below mount option, .compress_level can be configed w/ a negative number, which is not allowed to f2fs, let's add check condition to avoid it.
mount -o compress_algorithm=zstd:4294967295 /dev/sdx /mnt/f2fs
Fixes: 00e120b5e4b5 ("f2fs: assign default compression level") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
42954c37 |
| 06-Feb-2024 |
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
quota: Properly annotate i_dquot arrays with __rcu
[ Upstream commit ccb49011bb2ebfd66164dbf68c5bff48917bb5ef ]
Dquots pointed to from i_dquot arrays in inodes are protected by dquot_srcu. Annotate
quota: Properly annotate i_dquot arrays with __rcu
[ Upstream commit ccb49011bb2ebfd66164dbf68c5bff48917bb5ef ]
Dquots pointed to from i_dquot arrays in inodes are protected by dquot_srcu. Annotate them as such and change .get_dquots callback to return properly annotated pointer to make sparse happy.
Fixes: b9ba6f94b238 ("quota: remove dqptr_sem") Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
show more ...
|