| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | ordered-data.h | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | file-item.c | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ordered-data.c | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | relocation.c | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | file.c | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | inode.c | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/trace/events/ |
| H A D | btrfs.h | diff bffe633e00fb6b904817137fc17a44b42efcd985 Mon Dec 02 19:34:19 CST 2019 Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> btrfs: make btrfs_ordered_extent naming consistent with btrfs_file_extent_item
ordered->start, ordered->len, and ordered->disk_len correspond to
fi->disk_bytenr, fi->num_bytes, and fi->disk_num_bytes, respectively.
It's confusing to translate between the two naming schemes. Since a
btrfs_ordered_extent is basically a pending btrfs_file_extent_item,
let's make the former use the naming from the latter.
Note that I didn't touch the names in tracepoints just in case there are
scripts depending on the current naming.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|