/openbmc/linux/arch/mips/kvm/ |
H A D | mips.c | diff a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Thu May 23 11:43:08 CDT 2019 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu() function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard- ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use. Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too. So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest. With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/powerpc/kvm/ |
H A D | powerpc.c | diff a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Thu May 23 11:43:08 CDT 2019 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu() function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard- ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use. Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too. So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest. With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/s390/kvm/ |
H A D | kvm-s390.c | diff a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Thu May 23 11:43:08 CDT 2019 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu() function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard- ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use. Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too. So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest. With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/virt/kvm/ |
H A D | kvm_main.c | diff a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Thu May 23 11:43:08 CDT 2019 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu() function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard- ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use. Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too. So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest. With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/x86/kvm/ |
H A D | x86.c | diff a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Thu May 23 11:43:08 CDT 2019 Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu() function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard- ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use. Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too. So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS. This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest. With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
|