Searched hist:"5 decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa" (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/qemu/include/hw/riscv/ |
| H A D | shakti_c.h | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
| H A D | microchip_pfsoc.h | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
| H A D | sifive_e.h | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
| H A D | sifive_u.h | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
| H A D | virt.h | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|
| /openbmc/qemu/hw/intc/ |
| H A D | sifive_plic.c | diff 5decd2c5218379ad8362b932461d139eab7205fa Sat Dec 10 21:08:27 CST 2022 Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org> hw/intc: sifive_plic: Change "priority-base" to start from interrupt source 0
At present the SiFive PLIC model "priority-base" expects interrupt
priority register base starting from source 1 instead source 0,
that's why on most platforms "priority-base" is set to 0x04 except
'opentitan' machine. 'opentitan' should have set "priority-base"
to 0x04 too.
Note the irq number calculation in sifive_plic_{read,write} is
correct as the codes make up for the irq number by adding 1.
Let's simply update "priority-base" to start from interrupt source
0 and add a comment to make it crystal clear.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Wilfred Mallawa <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20221211030829.802437-14-bmeng@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
|