Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"1 eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/fs/jbd2/
H A Dtransaction.cdiff e03a9976afce6634826d56c33531dd10bb9a9166 Thu Sep 22 10:44:06 CDT 2016 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> jbd2: fix lockdep annotation in add_transaction_credits()

Thomas has reported a lockdep splat hitting in
add_transaction_credits(). The problem is that that function calls
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() while holding j_state_lock which is wrong
(we do not really wait for transaction commit while holding that lock).

Fix the problem by moving jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() into places where
we are ready to wait for transaction commit and thus j_state_lock is
unlocked.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
diff 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae Thu Jun 30 10:40:54 CDT 2016 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> jbd2: track more dependencies on transaction commit

So far we were tracking only dependency on transaction commit due to
starting a new handle (which may require commit to start a new
transaction). Now add tracking also for other cases where we wait for
transaction commit. This way lockdep can catch deadlocks e. g. because we
call jbd2_journal_stop() for a synchronous handle with some locks held
which rank below transaction start.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
H A Djournal.cdiff c52c47e4b4fbe4284602fc2ccbfc4a4d8dc05b49 Sat Apr 29 19:12:16 CDT 2017 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> jbd2: Fix lockdep splat with generic/270 test

I've hit a lockdep splat with generic/270 test complaining that:

3216.fsstress.b/3533 is trying to acquire lock:
(jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff813152e0>] jbd2_log_wait_commit+0x0/0x150

but task is already holding lock:
(jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff8130bd3b>] start_this_handle+0x35b/0x850

The underlying problem is that jbd2_journal_force_commit_nested()
(called from ext4_should_retry_alloc()) may get called while a
transaction handle is started. In such case it takes care to not wait
for commit of the running transaction (which would deadlock) but only
for a commit of a transaction that is already committing (which is safe
as that doesn't wait for any filesystem locks).

In fact there are also other callers of jbd2_log_wait_commit() that take
care to pass tid of a transaction that is already committing and for
those cases, the lockdep instrumentation is too restrictive and leading
to false positive reports. Fix the problem by calling
jbd2_might_wait_for_commit() from jbd2_log_wait_commit() only if the
transaction isn't already committing.

Fixes: 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
diff 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae Thu Jun 30 10:40:54 CDT 2016 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> jbd2: track more dependencies on transaction commit

So far we were tracking only dependency on transaction commit due to
starting a new handle (which may require commit to start a new
transaction). Now add tracking also for other cases where we wait for
transaction commit. This way lockdep can catch deadlocks e. g. because we
call jbd2_journal_stop() for a synchronous handle with some locks held
which rank below transaction start.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
/openbmc/linux/include/linux/
H A Djbd2.hdiff 1eaa566d368b214d99cbb973647c1b0b8102a9ae Thu Jun 30 10:40:54 CDT 2016 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> jbd2: track more dependencies on transaction commit

So far we were tracking only dependency on transaction commit due to
starting a new handle (which may require commit to start a new
transaction). Now add tracking also for other cases where we wait for
transaction commit. This way lockdep can catch deadlocks e. g. because we
call jbd2_journal_stop() for a synchronous handle with some locks held
which rank below transaction start.

Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>