History log of /openbmc/u-boot/test/dm/pwm.c (Results 1 – 7 of 7)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04, v2018.07
# 83d290c5 06-May-2018 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So

SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

show more ...


# d024236e 18-Apr-2018 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR

We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added

Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR

We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11
# 1a596c44 07-Jun-2017 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

test: pwm: Add a check that dev is not NULL

We know that uclass_get_device() does not return NULL for dev when it
succeeds but coverity does not. Add an extra check to hopefully keep it
happy.

Sign

test: pwm: Add a check that dev is not NULL

We know that uclass_get_device() does not return NULL for dev when it
succeeds but coverity does not. Add an extra check to hopefully keep it
happy.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 161690)
Fixes: 43b4156 (dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test)

show more ...


# 1f5541c8 10-May-2017 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip

This adds a new firefly-rk3399 board, MIPI support for rk3399 and
rk3288, rk818 pmic support, mkimage improvements for rockchip and a few
other things.


# 5540e25a 23-Apr-2017 Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>

dm: sandbox: pwm: add test for pwm_set_invert()

Add test case for new interface set_invert().

Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix typo

dm: sandbox: pwm: add test for pwm_set_invert()

Add test case for new interface set_invert().

Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Fix typo in subject and build error in sandbox_pwm_set_invert():
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 4f66e09b 09-May-2017 Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot

Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>


# 43b41566 16-Apr-2017 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test

Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was
submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:

http://patchwork.oz

dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test

Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was
submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/748172/

Add a simple test to get us started.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...