Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04, v2018.07 |
|
#
83d290c5 |
| 06-May-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
#
d024236e |
| 18-Apr-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11 |
|
#
1a596c44 |
| 07-Jun-2017 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
test: pwm: Add a check that dev is not NULL
We know that uclass_get_device() does not return NULL for dev when it succeeds but coverity does not. Add an extra check to hopefully keep it happy.
Sign
test: pwm: Add a check that dev is not NULL
We know that uclass_get_device() does not return NULL for dev when it succeeds but coverity does not. Add an extra check to hopefully keep it happy.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reported-by: Coverity (CID: 161690) Fixes: 43b4156 (dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test)
show more ...
|
#
1f5541c8 |
| 10-May-2017 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-rockchip
This adds a new firefly-rk3399 board, MIPI support for rk3399 and rk3288, rk818 pmic support, mkimage improvements for rockchip and a few other things.
|
#
5540e25a |
| 23-Apr-2017 |
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> |
dm: sandbox: pwm: add test for pwm_set_invert()
Add test case for new interface set_invert().
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Fix typo
dm: sandbox: pwm: add test for pwm_set_invert()
Add test case for new interface set_invert().
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Fix typo in subject and build error in sandbox_pwm_set_invert(): Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
#
4f66e09b |
| 09-May-2017 |
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> |
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
|
#
43b41566 |
| 16-Apr-2017 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test
Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:
http://patchwork.oz
dm: sandbox: pwm: Add a basic pwm test
Unfortunately a test for the PWM uclass was not included when it was submitted. This was noticed when trying to add more functionality:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/748172/
Add a simple test to get us started.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|