|
Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04, v2018.07 |
|
| #
83d290c5 |
| 06-May-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
| #
d024236e |
| 18-Apr-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
Remove unnecessary instances of DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR
We have a large number of places where while we historically referenced
gd in the code we no longer do, as well as cases where the code added
that line "just in case" during development and never dropped it.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11, v2016.07, openbmc-20160624-1 |
|
| #
08ca213a |
| 24-May-2016 |
Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de> |
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot
|
| #
4b6e1fda |
| 17-May-2016 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm
|
| #
341392dd |
| 01-May-2016 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
dm: mmc: test: Add tests for MMC
Add a simple test which checks that a sandbox-emulated SD card can be used
correctly. This tests plumbing through the MMC stack's block-device
implementaion.
Signed
dm: mmc: test: Add tests for MMC
Add a simple test which checks that a sandbox-emulated SD card can be used
correctly. This tests plumbing through the MMC stack's block-device
implementaion.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v2016.01-rc1, v2015.10, v2015.10-rc5, v2015.10-rc4, v2015.10-rc3, v2015.10-rc2, v2015.10-rc1, v2015.07 |
|
| #
8e6cc461 |
| 06-Jul-2015 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
dm: test: Add a test for the mmc uclass
Add a test to confirm that we can probe this device. Since there is no
MMC stack support in sandbox at present, this is as far as the test goes.
Signed-off-b
dm: test: Add a test for the mmc uclass
Add a test to confirm that we can probe this device. Since there is no
MMC stack support in sandbox at present, this is as far as the test goes.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|