|
Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04, v2018.07 |
|
| #
83d290c5 |
| 06-May-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11 |
|
| #
c62db35d |
| 31-May-2017 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
arm: Add explicit include of <asm/mach-types.h>
Rather than relying on common.h to provide this include, which is going
away at some point, include it explicitly in each file.
Signed-off-by: Simon
arm: Add explicit include of <asm/mach-types.h>
Rather than relying on common.h to provide this include, which is going
away at some point, include it explicitly in each file.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v2016.07, openbmc-20160624-1, v2016.01-rc1, v2015.10, v2015.10-rc5, v2015.10-rc4, v2015.10-rc3, v2015.10-rc2, v2015.10-rc1, v2015.07, v2015.07-rc3, v2015.07-rc2, v2015.07-rc1 |
|
| #
2a3c25d2 |
| 28-Apr-2015 |
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@gumstix.com> |
overo: Fix regression introduced in a6b541b
U-Boot has been broken on Overo boards since commit
a6b541b09022acb6f7c2754100ae26bd44eed1d9.
This is because the gd pointer is not set early enough anym
overo: Fix regression introduced in a6b541b
U-Boot has been broken on Overo boards since commit
a6b541b09022acb6f7c2754100ae26bd44eed1d9.
This is because the gd pointer is not set early enough anymore,
such that the i2c_set_bus_num in get_board_revision can safely
execute. This results in a console hang at SPL and the boot does
not proceed.
This piece of code is anyway necessary only for really old Overo
boards with revision numbers <= 2410 and not required for the newer
boards. For these older boards, u-boot v2014.10 still works fine.
Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj <arun@gumstix.com>
show more ...
|
| #
fe5d488f |
| 28-Apr-2015 |
Arun Bharadwaj <arun@gumstix.com> |
overo: Split overo.c into spl.c, common.c and overo.c
This separates the SPL-specific code from the u-boot-specific code for
the Overo board following the discussion at
http://lists.denx.de/pipermai
overo: Split overo.c into spl.c, common.c and overo.c
This separates the SPL-specific code from the u-boot-specific code for
the Overo board following the discussion at
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-April/211622.html
The code is split up into spl.c, overo.c and common.c (which
has the code common to both)
Signed-off-by: Arun Bharadwaj <arun@gumstix.com>
show more ...
|