History log of /openbmc/u-boot/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/fsp/fsp_configs.h (Results 1 – 7 of 7)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04, v2018.07
# 83d290c5 06-May-2018 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So

SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style

When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and
there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the
area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it
with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the
Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first
line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line)
and with slightly different comment styles than us.

In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility
and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.

This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared
license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag
contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag
and have introduced one.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11
# f0a1ad46 04-Jun-2017 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86


# f8f291b0 31-May-2017 Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

x86: baytrail: Change lpe/lpss-sio/scc FSP properties to integer

At present lpe/lpss-sio/scc FSP properties are all boolean, but in
fact for "enable-lpe" it has 3 possible options. This adds macros

x86: baytrail: Change lpe/lpss-sio/scc FSP properties to integer

At present lpe/lpss-sio/scc FSP properties are all boolean, but in
fact for "enable-lpe" it has 3 possible options. This adds macros
for these options and change the property from a boolean type to
an integer type, and change their names to explicitly indicate what
the property is really for.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...


# 5e74e5a6 31-May-2017 Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

x86: baytrail: Use macros instead of magic numbers for FSP settings

Introduce various meaningful macros for FSP settings and switch over
to use them instead of magic numbers.

Signed-off-by: Bin Men

x86: baytrail: Use macros instead of magic numbers for FSP settings

Introduce various meaningful macros for FSP settings and switch over
to use them instead of magic numbers.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v2016.07, openbmc-20160624-1
# 4edde961 14-Jan-2016 Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>

Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86


# 4ce022d3 11-Dec-2015 Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

x86: fsp: Move struct fspinit_rtbuf definition to chipset header

All FSP spec v1.0 complaint FSP binary uses struct fspinit_rtbuf
as defined by the 1.0 spec, however there are FSPs that does not
fol

x86: fsp: Move struct fspinit_rtbuf definition to chipset header

All FSP spec v1.0 complaint FSP binary uses struct fspinit_rtbuf
as defined by the 1.0 spec, however there are FSPs that does not
follow 1.0 spec (possible due to that FSP predates the 1.0 spec),
and future FSP binary that is complaint to v1.1 spec defines an
optional paltform-specific runtime data in the struct fspinit_rtbuf.
Hence move the definition to chipset header.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...


# cb379a34 11-Dec-2015 Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>

x86: fsp: Rename shared_data to fsp_config_data

FSP has several config data like UPD, HDA verb table which can be
overridden or provided by bootloader. Currently in U-Boot only UPD
is handled via st

x86: fsp: Rename shared_data to fsp_config_data

FSP has several config data like UPD, HDA verb table which can be
overridden or provided by bootloader. Currently in U-Boot only UPD
is handled via struct shared_data. To accommodate any platform, we
rename shared_data to fsp_config_data and move the definition from
common place fsp_support.h to platform-specific place fsp_configs.h.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

show more ...