Revision tags: v00.04.15, v00.04.14, v00.04.13, v00.04.12, v00.04.11, v00.04.10, v00.04.09, v00.04.08, v00.04.07, v00.04.06, v00.04.05, v00.04.04, v00.04.03, v00.04.02, v00.04.01, v00.04.00, v2021.04, v00.03.03, v2021.01, v2020.10, v2020.07, v00.02.13, v2020.04, v2020.01, v2019.10, v00.02.05, v00.02.04, v00.02.03, v00.02.02, v00.02.01, v2019.07, v00.02.00, v2019.04 |
|
#
a30691a5 |
| 03-Aug-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm
|
#
3ab9598d |
| 01-Aug-2018 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
binman: Rename 'position' to 'offset'
After some thought, I believe there is an unfortunate naming flaw in binman. Entries have a position and size, but now that we support hierarchical sections it
binman: Rename 'position' to 'offset'
After some thought, I believe there is an unfortunate naming flaw in binman. Entries have a position and size, but now that we support hierarchical sections it is unclear whether a position should be an absolute position within the image, or a relative position within its parent section.
At present 'position' actually means the relative position. This indicates a need for an 'image position' for code that wants to find the location of an entry without having to do calculations back through parents to discover this image position.
A better name for the current 'position' or 'pos' is 'offset'. It is not always an absolute position, but it is always an offset from its parent offset.
It is unfortunate to rename this concept now, 18 months after binman was introduced. However I believe it is the right thing to do. The impact is mostly limited to binman itself and a few changes to in-tree users to binman:
tegra sunxi x86
The change makes old binman definitions (e.g. downstream or out-of-tree) incompatible if they use the 'pos = <...>' property. Later work will adjust binman to generate an error when it is used.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v2018.07 |
|
#
83d290c5 |
| 06-May-2018 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So
SPDX: Convert all of our single license tags to Linux Kernel style
When U-Boot started using SPDX tags we were among the early adopters and there weren't a lot of other examples to borrow from. So we picked the area of the file that usually had a full license text and replaced it with an appropriate SPDX-License-Identifier: entry. Since then, the Linux Kernel has adopted SPDX tags and they place it as the very first line in a file (except where shebangs are used, then it's second line) and with slightly different comment styles than us.
In part due to community overlap, in part due to better tag visibility and in part for other minor reasons, switch over to that style.
This commit changes all instances where we have a single declared license in the tag as both the before and after are identical in tag contents. There's also a few places where I found we did not have a tag and have introduced one.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v2018.03, v2018.01, v2017.11 |
|
#
c07f3820 |
| 17-Sep-2017 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86
|
#
6c22379e |
| 16-Aug-2017 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
x86: dts: Include Intel Video BIOS Table in the ROM image
Now that binman is able to recognize the Video BIOS Table entry, add such one in the u-boot.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.c
x86: dts: Include Intel Video BIOS Table in the ROM image
Now that binman is able to recognize the Video BIOS Table entry, add such one in the u-boot.dtsi.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
#
01cce5fd |
| 10-Apr-2017 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86
|
#
cccab03a |
| 30-Mar-2017 |
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> |
x86: Add file names from Kconfig in descriptor/intel-me nodes in u-boot.dtsi
Since we now have the file names configurable via Kconfig for the flash descriptor and intel-me files, add these from Kco
x86: Add file names from Kconfig in descriptor/intel-me nodes in u-boot.dtsi
Since we now have the file names configurable via Kconfig for the flash descriptor and intel-me files, add these from Kconfig in the corresponding dts nodes.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
show more ...
|
#
164f0414 |
| 16-Jan-2017 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
x86: link: Add SPL declarations to the binman image
When building for 64-bit we need to put an SPL binary into the image. Update the binman image description to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Simon G
x86: link: Add SPL declarations to the binman image
When building for 64-bit we need to put an SPL binary into the image. Update the binman image description to reflect this.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
show more ...
|
#
79e550e0 |
| 25-Dec-2016 |
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> |
x86: Add file names from Kconfig in CMC/FSP/VGA nodes in u-boot.dtsi
Since we already have a bunch of Kconfig options for CMC/FSP/VGA file names, add these from Kconfig in the corresponding dts node
x86: Add file names from Kconfig in CMC/FSP/VGA nodes in u-boot.dtsi
Since we already have a bunch of Kconfig options for CMC/FSP/VGA file names, add these from Kconfig in the corresponding dts nodes.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
show more ...
|
#
36737f22 |
| 20-Dec-2016 |
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com> |
Merge git://git.denx.de/u-boot-dm
|
#
b215fbd8 |
| 25-Nov-2016 |
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> |
x86: Use binman all x86 boards
Change x86 boards to use binman to produce the ROM. This involves adding the image definition to the device tree and using it in the Makefile. The existing ifdtool fea
x86: Use binman all x86 boards
Change x86 boards to use binman to produce the ROM. This involves adding the image definition to the device tree and using it in the Makefile. The existing ifdtool features are no-longer needed.
Note that the u-boot.dtsi file is common and is used for all x86 boards which use microcode. A separate emulation-u-boot-dtsi is used for the others.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
show more ...
|