Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05' into staging

drop qapi nested structs

# gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 17:40:40 2015 BST using RSA key ID EB918653
# gpg: Good

Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05' into staging

drop qapi nested structs

# gpg: Signature made Tue May 5 17:40:40 2015 BST using RSA key ID EB918653
# gpg: Good signature from "Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>"
# gpg: aka "Markus Armbruster <armbru@pond.sub.org>"

* remotes/armbru/tags/pull-qmp-2015-05-05: (40 commits)
qapi: Check for member name conflicts with a base class
qapi: Support (subset of) \u escapes in strings
qapi: Tweak doc references to QMP when QGA is also meant
qapi: Drop dead visitor code related to nested structs
qapi: Drop support for inline nested types
qapi: Drop inline nested structs in query-pci
qapi: Drop inline nested struct in query-version
qapi: Drop tests for inline nested structs
qapi: Merge UserDefTwo and UserDefNested in tests
qapi: Forbid 'type' in schema
qapi: Use 'struct' instead of 'type' in schema
qapi: Document 'struct' metatype
qapi: Prefer 'struct' over 'type' in generator
qapi: More rigorous checking for type safety bypass
qapi: Whitelist commands that don't return dictionary
qapi: Require valid names
qapi: More rigourous checking of types
qapi: Add some type check tests
qapi: Unify type bypass and add tests
qapi: Allow true, false and null in schema json
...

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

show more ...

qapi: Forbid base without discriminator in unions

None of the existing QMP or QGA interfaces uses a union with a
base type but no discriminator; it is easier to avoid this in the
generator to save r

qapi: Forbid base without discriminator in unions

None of the existing QMP or QGA interfaces uses a union with a
base type but no discriminator; it is easier to avoid this in the
generator to save room for other future extensions more likely to
be useful. An earlier commit added a union-base-no-discriminator
test to ensure that we eventually give a decent error message;
likewise, removing UserDefUnion outright is okay, because we moved
all the tests we wish to keep into the tests of the simple union
UserDefNativeListUnion in the previous commit. Now is the time to
actually forbid simple union with base, and remove the last
vestiges from the testsuite.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...

qapi: Add some union tests

Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with unions
that aren't up to par. Later patches will update the expected
reseults as the generator is made stricter.

qapi: Add some union tests

Demonstrate that the qapi generator doesn't deal well with unions
that aren't up to par. Later patches will update the expected
reseults as the generator is made stricter. A few tests work
as planned, but most show poor or missing error messages.

Of particular note, qapi-code-gen.txt documents 'base' only for
flat unions, but the tests here demonstrate that we currently allow
a 'base' to a simple union, although it is exercised only in the
testsuite. Later patches will remove this undocumented feature, to
give us more flexibility in adding other future extensions to union
types. For example, one possible extension is the idea of a
type-safe simple enum, where added fields tie the discriminator to
a user-defined enum type rather than creating an implicit enum from
the names in 'data'. But adding such safety on top of a simple
enum with a base type could look ambiguous with a flat enum;
besides, the documentation also mentions how any simple union can
be represented by an equivalent flat union. So it will be simpler
to just outlaw support for something we aren't using.

Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

show more ...