|
Revision tags: v9.2.0, v9.1.2, v9.1.1, v9.1.0 |
|
| #
f5e80be3 |
| 28-Nov-2023 |
Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> |
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's cfam,fsi-slave,scratchpad
This is a part of patchset where IBM's Flexible Service Interface is
introduced.
The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
va
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's cfam,fsi-slave,scratchpad
This is a part of patchset where IBM's Flexible Service Interface is
introduced.
The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
The scratchpad provides a set of non-functional registers. The firmware
is free to use them, hardware does not support any special management
support. The scratchpad registers can be read or written from LBUS
slave. The scratch pad is managed under FSI CFAM state.
[ clg: - moved object FSIScratchPad under FSICFAMState
- moved FSIScratchPad code under cfam.c
- introduced fsi_cfam_instance_init()
- reworked fsi_cfam_realize() ]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
| #
e332fdc0 |
| 28-Nov-2023 |
Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> |
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI Bus
This is a part of patchset where FSI bus is introduced.
The FSI bus is a simple bus where FSI master is attached.
[ clg: - removed include/hw/fsi/engine-scratchpad.
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI Bus
This is a part of patchset where FSI bus is introduced.
The FSI bus is a simple bus where FSI master is attached.
[ clg: - removed include/hw/fsi/engine-scratchpad.h and
hw/fsi/engine-scratchpad.c
- dropped FSI_SCRATCHPAD
- included FSIBus definition
- dropped hw/fsi/trace-events changes ]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
| #
c3709fde |
| 01-Feb-2024 |
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> |
Merge tag 'pull-aspeed-20240201' of https://github.com/legoater/qemu into staging
aspeed queue:
* Update of buildroot images to 2023.11 (6.6.3 kernel)
* Check of the valid CPU type supported by asp
Merge tag 'pull-aspeed-20240201' of https://github.com/legoater/qemu into staging
aspeed queue:
* Update of buildroot images to 2023.11 (6.6.3 kernel)
* Check of the valid CPU type supported by aspeed machines
* Simplified models for the IBM's FSI bus and the Aspeed
controller bridge
# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
# iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEoPZlSPBIlev+awtgUaNDx8/77KEFAmW7Sa8ACgkQUaNDx8/7
# 7KG7mw/8DbMJY6aqgq5YANszzem1ktJphPCNxq081cbczCOUpCNX4aL+0/ANvxxD
# lbJQB+SZeIRmuFbxYPhq68rtzB4vG7tsQpns4H33EPKT4vuzF70lq4fgptMiun3q
# 1ZJ2LF3jonvQWdhbC17wzAQz0FFb4F7XOxz++UL4okPsgzsYItnd+TWs8q7+erRb
# 84UwN+eBTBAl/FiNk679/tBTqAfCVGgQ7dzotr4f3tg5POvrGOrlEjAn0O+dGGDj
# wgILmpEBsTsilRB1tz8Kw0j/v/VkHz1DJu45lRAV9CIrN22iKcjMilNGgNDT8kcI
# yAlxAw3iN+hVFqDov8wFPjDYd/Qw2oRAPy2Kd14hW9xL8zBOTms1JK5L0PS2+Feo
# ZjMJ2cOJq3t4Wt1ZXRhgHfF4ANwP0OZ/y9bHCy3CkBljEeiTQbikHP9gVV4qHXZH
# 4Q0HnDZQwAgobw3CmZ8jVx1dQueqy3ycuvkhCyv3S0l/tdbtXDtr5pNNu3dAP/PJ
# 3nifLdRImhDvxxO9GKaCdUVLzELzMJl0GrgAsVJPKVnKHA4IiVKmB+XcW9IUbfy/
# 3zA2wHJLrEF+MF6MsuNcEYCCqUvyNLm7rUrXk1wNLXpCJ35bbW5IYy7Ty/8E2GHb
# D5Cv/EPNhMBiNA4+HqQlMOTC13Ozv2qwCuWYCh2Ik8mnzaEiyTo=
# =0C5S
# -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# gpg: Signature made Thu 01 Feb 2024 07:35:11 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key A0F66548F04895EBFE6B0B6051A343C7CFFBECA1
# gpg: Good signature from "Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>" [undefined]
# gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
# gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
# Primary key fingerprint: A0F6 6548 F048 95EB FE6B 0B60 51A3 43C7 CFFB ECA1
* tag 'pull-aspeed-20240201' of https://github.com/legoater/qemu:
hw/fsi: Update MAINTAINER list
hw/fsi: Added FSI documentation
hw/fsi: Added qtest
hw/arm: Hook up FSI module in AST2600
hw/fsi: Aspeed APB2OPB & On-chip peripheral bus
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI master
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's cfam
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's fsi-slave model
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI Bus
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's scratchpad device
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's Local bus
hw/arm/aspeed: Check for CPU types in machine_run_board_init()
hw/arm/aspeed: Introduce aspeed_soc_cpu_type() helper
hw/arm/aspeed: Init CPU defaults in a common helper
hw/arm/aspeed: Set default CPU count using aspeed_soc_num_cpus()
hw/arm/aspeed: Remove dead code
tests/avocado/machine_aspeed.py: Update buildroot images to 2023.11
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
show more ...
|
| #
6a2897bb |
| 26-Jan-2024 |
Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> |
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's fsi-slave model
This is a part of patchset where IBM's Flexible Service Interface is
introduced.
The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbol
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's fsi-slave model
This is a part of patchset where IBM's Flexible Service Interface is
introduced.
The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
| #
f4de3ca1 |
| 26-Jan-2024 |
Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com> |
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI Bus
This is a part of patchset where FSI bus is introduced.
The FSI bus is a simple bus where FSI master is attached.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Si
hw/fsi: Introduce IBM's FSI Bus
This is a part of patchset where FSI bus is introduced.
The FSI bus is a simple bus where FSI master is attached.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg: - removed include/hw/fsi/engine-scratchpad.h and
hw/fsi/engine-scratchpad.c
- dropped FSI_SCRATCHPAD
- included FSIBus definition
- dropped hw/fsi/trace-events changes ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
| #
37d5505a |
| 16-Aug-2023 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time.
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v8.0.0 |
|
| #
f69f73e1 |
| 13-Apr-2023 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time.
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v7.2.0 |
|
| #
13dc434e |
| 05-Dec-2022 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time/
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
| #
606987e4 |
| 20-Apr-2022 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time/
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v7.0.0, v6.2.0 |
|
| #
dbfd61ce |
| 21-Sep-2021 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time/
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v6.1.0 |
|
| #
9d287d6e |
| 09-Dec-2020 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
[clg: tons of fixes, lots of love and care and time/
we need to split this patch ! ]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v5.2.0, v5.0.0 |
|
| #
b80bfaad |
| 13-Dec-2019 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|
|
Revision tags: v4.2.0 |
|
| #
6ce8733e |
| 10-Sep-2019 |
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au> |
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for
hw: Introduce models for IBM's Flexible Service Interface
Firstly, I'll split this patch up in the future, but wanted to get the
integrated setup sent out for any initial thoughts. Anyway:
Time for some fun with inter-processor buses. FSI allows a service
processor access to the internal busses of a host POWER processor to
perform configuration or debugging.
FSI has long existed in POWER processes and so comes with some baggage,
including how it has been integrated into the ASPEED SoC.
Working backwards from the POWER processor, the fundamental pieces of
interest for the implementation are:
1. The Common FRU Access Macro (CFAM), an address space containing
various "engines" that drive accesses on busses internal and external
to the POWER chip. Examples include the SBEFIFO and I2C masters. The
engines hang off of an internal Local Bus (LBUS) which is described
by the CFAM configuration block.
2. The FSI slave: The slave is the terminal point of the FSI bus for
FSI symbols addressed to it. Slaves can be cascaded off of one
another. The slave's configuration registers appear in address space
of the CFAM to which it is attached.
3. The FSI master: A controller in the platform service processor (e.g.
BMC) driving CFAM engine accesses into the POWER chip. At the
hardware level FSI is a bit-based protocol supporting synchronous and
DMA-driven accesses of engines in a CFAM.
4. The On-Chip Peripheral Bus (OPB): A low-speed bus typically found in
POWER processors. This now makes an appearance in the ASPEED SoC due
to tight integration of the FSI master IP with the OPB, mainly the
existence of an MMIO-mapping of the CFAM address straight onto a
sub-region of the OPB address space.
5. An APB-to-OPB bridge enabling access to the OPB from the ARM core in
the AST2600. Hardware limitations prevent the OPB from being directly
mapped into APB, so all accesses are indirect through the bridge.
The implementation appears as following in the qemu device tree:
(qemu) info qtree
bus: main-system-bus
type System
...
dev: aspeed.apb2opb, id ""
gpio-out "sysbus-irq" 1
mmio 000000001e79b000/0000000000001000
bus: opb.1
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.1
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.1
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
bus: opb.0
type opb
dev: fsi.master, id ""
bus: fsi.bus.0
type fsi.bus
dev: cfam.config, id ""
dev: cfam, id ""
bus: lbus.0
type lbus
dev: scratchpad, id ""
address = 0 (0x0)
The LBUS is modelled to maintain the qdev bus hierarchy and to take
advantage of the object model to automatically generate the CFAM
configuration block. The configuration block presents engines in the
order they are attached to the CFAM's LBUS. Engine implementations
should subclass the LBusDevice and set the 'config' member of
LBusDeviceClass to match the engine's type.
CFAM designs offer a lot of flexibility, for instance it is possible for
a CFAM to be simultaneously driven from multiple FSI links. The modeling
is not so complete; it's assumed that each CFAM is attached to a single
FSI slave (as a consequence the CFAM subclasses the FSI slave).
As for FSI, its symbols and wire-protocol are not modelled at all. This
is not necessary to get FSI off the ground thanks to the mapping of the
CFAM address space onto the OPB address space - the models follow this
directly and map the CFAM memory region into the OPB's memory region.
Future work includes supporting more advanced accesses that drive the
FSI master directly rather than indirectly via the CFAM mapping, which
will require implementing the FSI state machine and methods for each of
the FSI symbols on the slave. Further down the track we can also look at
supporting the bitbanged SoftFSI drivers in Linux by extending the FSI
slave model to resolve sequences of GPIO IRQs into FSI symbols, and
calling the associated symbol method on the slave to map the access onto
the CFAM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
show more ...
|