History log of /openbmc/linux/lib/kunit/resource.c (Results 1 – 25 of 26)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.67, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.6.64, v6.6.63, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57, v6.6.56, v6.6.55, v6.6.54, v6.6.53, v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49, v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46, v6.6.45, v6.6.44, v6.6.43, v6.6.42, v6.6.41, v6.6.40, v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29, v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44
# 2612e3bb 07-Aug-2023 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...


# 9f771739 07-Aug-2023 Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41
# 61b73694 24-Jul-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


Revision tags: v6.1.40, v6.1.39
# 0791faeb 17-Jul-2023 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.


# 2f98e686 11-Jul-2023 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>


Revision tags: v6.1.38, v6.1.37
# 44f10dbe 30-Jun-2023 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable


Revision tags: v6.1.36
# 9ba92dc1 27-Jun-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.5-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:

- kunit_add_action() API to defer a call until

Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.5-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:

- kunit_add_action() API to defer a call until test exit

- Update document to add kunit_add_action() usage notes

- Changes to always run cleanup from a test kthread

- Documentation updates to clarify cleanup usage (assertions should not
be used in cleanup)

- Documentation update to clearly indicate that exit functions should
run even if init fails

- Several fixes and enhancements to existing tests

* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-6.5-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
MAINTAINERS: Add source tree entry for kunit
Documentation: kunit: Rename references to kunit_abort()
kunit: Move kunit_abort() call out of kunit_do_failed_assertion()
kunit: Fix obsolete name in documentation headers (func->action)
Documentation: Kunit: add MODULE_LICENSE to sample code
kunit: Update kunit_print_ok_not_ok function
kunit: Fix reporting of the skipped parameterized tests
kunit/test: Add example test showing parameterized testing
Documentation: kunit: Add usage notes for kunit_add_action()
kunit: kmalloc_array: Use kunit_add_action()
kunit: executor_test: Use kunit_add_action()
kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit
kunit: example: Provide example exit functions
Documentation: kunit: Warn that exit functions run even if init fails
Documentation: kunit: Note that assertions should not be used in cleanup
kunit: Always run cleanup from a test kthread
Documentation: kunit: Modular tests should not depend on KUNIT=y
kunit: tool: undo type subscripts for subprocess.Popen

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31
# b9dce8a1 24-May-2023 David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit

Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer
calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or
fai

kunit: Add kunit_add_action() to defer a call until test exit

Many uses of the KUnit resource system are intended to simply defer
calling a function until the test exits (be it due to success or
failure). The existing kunit_alloc_resource() function is often used for
this, but was awkward to use (requiring passing NULL init functions, etc),
and returned a resource without incrementing its reference count, which
-- while okay for this use-case -- could cause problems in others.

Instead, introduce a simple kunit_add_action() API: a simple function
(returning nothing, accepting a single void* argument) can be scheduled
to be called when the test exits. Deferred actions are called in the
opposite order to that which they were registered.

This mimics the devres API, devm_add_action(), and also provides
kunit_remove_action(), to cancel a deferred action, and
kunit_release_action() to trigger one early.

This is implemented as a resource under the hood, so the ordering
between resource cleanup and deferred functions is maintained.

Reviewed-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Tested-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13
# 4f2c0a4a 13-Dec-2022 Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>

Merge branch 'main' into zstd-linus


Revision tags: v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4
# 14e77332 21-Oct-2022 Nick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>

Merge branch 'main' into zstd-next


Revision tags: v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72
# 97acb6a8 03-Oct-2022 Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Daniele needs 84d4333c1e28 ("misc/mei: Add NULL check to component match
callback functions") in order to merge the DG2 HuC patches.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Daniele needs 84d4333c1e28 ("misc/mei: Add NULL check to component match
callback functions") in order to merge the DG2 HuC patches.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60
# 44627916 05-Aug-2022 Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>

Merge part of branch 'for-next.instantiate' into for-next


# fc30eea1 04-Aug-2022 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Sync up. In special to get the drm-intel-gt-next stuff.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


Revision tags: v5.15.59
# 8bb5e7f4 02-Aug-2022 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 5.20 (or 6.0) merge window.


Revision tags: v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55
# f83d9396 14-Jul-2022 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next-fixes

Backmerging from drm/drm-next for the final fixes that will go
into v5.20.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


Revision tags: v5.15.54
# a63f7778 08-Jul-2022 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge tag 'v5.19-rc5' into next

Merge with mainline to bring up the latest definition from MFD subsystem
needed for Mediatek keypad driver.


Revision tags: v5.15.53
# dd84cfff 04-Jul-2022 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v5.19-rc3' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus

ASoC: Fixes for v5.19

A collection of fixes for v5.19, quite large but nothing major -

Merge tag 'asoc-fix-v5.19-rc3' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into for-linus

ASoC: Fixes for v5.19

A collection of fixes for v5.19, quite large but nothing major - a good
chunk of it is more stuff that was identified by mixer-test regarding
event generation.

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49
# 2b1333b8 20-Jun-2022 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get new regmap APIs of v5.19-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


Revision tags: v5.15.48
# f777316e 15-Jun-2022 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

Merge branch 'topic/ctl-enhancements' into for-next

Pull ALSA control enhancement patches.
One is the faster lookup of control elements, and another is to
introduce the input data validation.

Signe

Merge branch 'topic/ctl-enhancements' into for-next

Pull ALSA control enhancement patches.
One is the faster lookup of control elements, and another is to
introduce the input data validation.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.47
# 66da6500 09-Jun-2022 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Merge tag 'kvm-riscv-fixes-5.19-1' of https://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux into HEAD

KVM/riscv fixes for 5.19, take #1

- Typo fix in arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c

- Remove broken reference pattern from MAIN

Merge tag 'kvm-riscv-fixes-5.19-1' of https://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux into HEAD

KVM/riscv fixes for 5.19, take #1

- Typo fix in arch/riscv/kvm/vmid.c

- Remove broken reference pattern from MAINTAINERS entry

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.46
# 6e2b347d 08-Jun-2022 Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>

Merge v5.19-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Let's kick-off the start of the 5.19 fix cycle

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>


# 073350da 07-Jun-2022 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Merge tag 'v5.19-rc1' into asoc-5.19

Linux 5.19-rc1


Revision tags: v5.15.45, v5.15.44
# 64e34b50 25-May-2022 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
"Several fixes, cleanups, and enhancements to t

Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
"Several fixes, cleanups, and enhancements to tests and framework:

- introduce _NULL and _NOT_NULL macros to pointer error checks

- rework kunit_resource allocation policy to fix memory leaks when
caller doesn't specify free() function to be used when allocating
memory using kunit_add_resource() and kunit_alloc_resource() funcs.

- add ability to specify suite-level init and exit functions"

* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.19-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (41 commits)
kunit: tool: Use qemu-system-i386 for i386 runs
kunit: fix executor OOM error handling logic on non-UML
kunit: tool: update riscv QEMU config with new serial dependency
kcsan: test: use new suite_{init,exit} support
kunit: tool: Add list of all valid test configs on UML
kunit: take `kunit_assert` as `const`
kunit: tool: misc cleanups
kunit: tool: minor cosmetic cleanups in kunit_parser.py
kunit: tool: make parser stop overwriting status of suites w/ no_tests
kunit: tool: remove dead parse_crash_in_log() logic
kunit: tool: print clearer error message when there's no TAP output
kunit: tool: stop using a shell to run kernel under QEMU
kunit: tool: update test counts summary line format
kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM
lib/Kconfig.debug: change KUnit tests to default to KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
kunit: Rework kunit_resource allocation policy
kunit: fix debugfs code to use enum kunit_status, not bool
kfence: test: use new suite_{init/exit} support, add .kunitconfig
kunit: add ability to specify suite-level init and exit functions
kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)
...

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33
# ad69172e 01-Apr-2022 David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

kunit: Rework kunit_resource allocation policy

KUnit's test-managed resources can be created in two ways:
- Using the kunit_add_resource() family of functions, which accept a
struct kunit_resource

kunit: Rework kunit_resource allocation policy

KUnit's test-managed resources can be created in two ways:
- Using the kunit_add_resource() family of functions, which accept a
struct kunit_resource pointer, typically allocated statically or on
the stack during the test.
- Using the kunit_alloc_resource() family of functions, which allocate a
struct kunit_resource using kzalloc() behind the scenes.

Both of these families of functions accept a 'free' function to be
called when the resource is finally disposed of.

At present, KUnit will kfree() the resource if this 'free' function is
specified, and will not if it is NULL. However, this can lead
kunit_alloc_resource() to leak memory (if no 'free' function is passed
in), or kunit_add_resource() to incorrectly kfree() memory which was
allocated by some other means (on the stack, as part of a larger
allocation, etc), if a 'free' function is provided.

Instead, always kfree() if the resource was allocated with
kunit_alloc_resource(), and never kfree() if it was passed into
kunit_add_resource() by the user. (If the user of kunit_add_resource()
wishes the resource be kfree()ed, they can call kfree() on the resource
from within the 'free' function.

This is implemented by adding a 'should_free' member to
struct kunit_resource and setting it appropriately. To facilitate this,
the various resource add/alloc functions have been refactored somewhat,
making them all call a __kunit_add_resource() helper after setting the
'should_free' member appropriately. In the process, all other functions
have been made static inline functions.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# 59729170 01-Apr-2022 David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

kunit: Make kunit_remove_resource() idempotent

The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from
the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in
kunit_find_res

kunit: Make kunit_remove_resource() idempotent

The kunit_remove_resource() function is used to unlink a resource from
the list of resources in the test, making it no longer show up in
kunit_find_resource().

However, this could lead to a race condition if two threads called
kunit_remove_resource() on the same resource at the same time: the
resource would be removed from the list twice (causing a crash at the
second list_del()), and the refcount for the resource would be
decremented twice (instead of once, for the reference held by the
resource list).

Fix both problems, the first by using list_del_init(), and the second by
checking if the resource has already been removed using list_empty(),
and only decrementing its refcount if it has not.

Also add a KUnit test for the kunit_remove_resource() function which
tests this behaviour.

Reported-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


12