History log of /openbmc/linux/kernel/cpu.c (Results 1 – 25 of 2194)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
# aad29a73 23-Jan-2025 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.74' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.74 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.74, v6.6.73, v6.6.72, v6.6.71, v6.12.9, v6.6.70, v6.12.8, v6.6.69, v6.12.7, v6.6.68
# a5cbbea1 20-Dec-2024 Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>

hrtimers: Handle CPU state correctly on hotplug

commit 2f8dea1692eef2b7ba6a256246ed82c365fdc686 upstream.

Consider a scenario where a CPU transitions from CPUHP_ONLINE to halfway
through a CPU hotu

hrtimers: Handle CPU state correctly on hotplug

commit 2f8dea1692eef2b7ba6a256246ed82c365fdc686 upstream.

Consider a scenario where a CPU transitions from CPUHP_ONLINE to halfway
through a CPU hotunplug down to CPUHP_HRTIMERS_PREPARE, and then back to
CPUHP_ONLINE:

Since hrtimers_prepare_cpu() does not run, cpu_base.hres_active remains set
to 1 throughout. However, during a CPU unplug operation, the tick and the
clockevents are shut down at CPUHP_AP_TICK_DYING. On return to the online
state, for instance CFS incorrectly assumes that the hrtick is already
active, and the chance of the clockevent device to transition to oneshot
mode is also lost forever for the CPU, unless it goes back to a lower state
than CPUHP_HRTIMERS_PREPARE once.

This round-trip reveals another issue; cpu_base.online is not set to 1
after the transition, which appears as a WARN_ON_ONCE in enqueue_hrtimer().

Aside of that, the bulk of the per CPU state is not reset either, which
means there are dangling pointers in the worst case.

Address this by adding a corresponding startup() callback, which resets the
stale per CPU state and sets the online flag.

[ tglx: Make the new callback unconditionally available, remove the online
modification in the prepare() callback and clear the remaining
state in the starting callback instead of the prepare callback ]

Fixes: 5c0930ccaad5 ("hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier")
Signed-off-by: Koichiro Den <koichiro.den@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241220134421.3809834-1-koichiro.den@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.12.6, v6.6.67, v6.12.5, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.12.4, v6.6.64, v6.12.3, v6.12.2, v6.6.63, v6.12.1, v6.12, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57, v6.6.56, v6.6.55, v6.6.54, v6.6.53, v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49
# 26d0dfbb 29-Aug-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.48' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.48 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46, v6.6.45, v6.6.44
# f17c3a37 30-Jul-2024 Nysal Jan K.A <nysal@linux.ibm.com>

cpu/SMT: Enable SMT only if a core is online

[ Upstream commit 6c17ea1f3eaa330d445ac14a9428402ce4e3055e ]

If a core is offline then enabling SMT should not online CPUs of
this core. By enabling SMT

cpu/SMT: Enable SMT only if a core is online

[ Upstream commit 6c17ea1f3eaa330d445ac14a9428402ce4e3055e ]

If a core is offline then enabling SMT should not online CPUs of
this core. By enabling SMT, what is intended is either changing the SMT
value from "off" to "on" or setting the SMT level (threads per core) from a
lower to higher value.

On PowerPC the ppc64_cpu utility can be used, among other things, to
perform the following functions:

ppc64_cpu --cores-on # Get the number of online cores
ppc64_cpu --cores-on=X # Put exactly X cores online
ppc64_cpu --offline-cores=X[,Y,...] # Put specified cores offline
ppc64_cpu --smt={on|off|value} # Enable, disable or change SMT level

If the user has decided to offline certain cores, enabling SMT should
not online CPUs in those cores. This patch fixes the issue and changes
the behaviour as described, by introducing an arch specific function
topology_is_core_online(). It is currently implemented only for PowerPC.

Fixes: 73c58e7e1412 ("powerpc: Add HOTPLUG_SMT support")
Reported-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Closes: https://groups.google.com/g/powerpc-utils-devel/c/wrwVzAAnRlI/m/5KJSoqP4BAAJ
Signed-off-by: Nysal Jan K.A <nysal@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20240731030126.956210-2-nysal@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.43, v6.6.42, v6.6.41, v6.6.40
# ee1cd504 12-Jul-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.39' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.39 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35
# 69787793 18-Jun-2024 Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>

cpu: Fix broken cmdline "nosmp" and "maxcpus=0"

commit 6ef8eb5125722c241fd60d7b0c872d5c2e5dd4ca upstream.

After the rework of "Parallel CPU bringup", the cmdline "nosmp" and
"maxcpus=0" parameters

cpu: Fix broken cmdline "nosmp" and "maxcpus=0"

commit 6ef8eb5125722c241fd60d7b0c872d5c2e5dd4ca upstream.

After the rework of "Parallel CPU bringup", the cmdline "nosmp" and
"maxcpus=0" parameters are not working anymore. These parameters set
setup_max_cpus to zero and that's handed to bringup_nonboot_cpus().

The code there does a decrement before checking for zero, which brings it
into the negative space and brings up all CPUs.

Add a zero check at the beginning of the function to prevent this.

[ tglx: Massaged change log ]

Fixes: 18415f33e2ac4ab382 ("cpu/hotplug: Allow "parallel" bringup up to CPUHP_BP_KICK_AP_STATE")
Fixes: 06c6796e0304234da6 ("cpu/hotplug: Fix off by one in cpuhp_bringup_mask()")
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240618081336.3996825-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# f91ca89e 10-Jul-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.37' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.37 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31
# 52bbae42 15-May-2024 Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>

cpu/hotplug: Fix dynstate assignment in __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()

commit 932d8476399f622aa0767a4a0a9e78e5341dc0e1 upstream.

Commit 4205e4786d0b ("cpu/hotplug: Provide dynamic range for prepa

cpu/hotplug: Fix dynstate assignment in __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked()

commit 932d8476399f622aa0767a4a0a9e78e5341dc0e1 upstream.

Commit 4205e4786d0b ("cpu/hotplug: Provide dynamic range for prepare
stage") added a dynamic range for the prepare states, but did not handle
the assignment of the dynstate variable in __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked().

This causes the corresponding startup callback not to be invoked when
calling __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked() with the CPUHP_BP_PREPARE_DYN
parameter, even though it should be.

Currently, the users of __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked(), for one reason or
another, have not triggered this bug.

Fixes: 4205e4786d0b ("cpu/hotplug: Provide dynamic range for prepare stage")
Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515134554.427071-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# b181f702 12-Jun-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.33' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.33 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.30, v6.6.29
# 976b74fa 19-Apr-2024 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n

[ Upstream commit ce0abef6a1d540acef85068e0e82bdf1fbeeb0e9 ]

Explicitly disallow enabling mitigations at runtime for kernels that wer

cpu: Ignore "mitigations" kernel parameter if CPU_MITIGATIONS=n

[ Upstream commit ce0abef6a1d540acef85068e0e82bdf1fbeeb0e9 ]

Explicitly disallow enabling mitigations at runtime for kernels that were
built with CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n, as some architectures may omit code
entirely if mitigations are disabled at compile time.

E.g. on x86, a large pile of Kconfigs are buried behind CPU_MITIGATIONS,
and trying to provide sane behavior for retroactively enabling mitigations
is extremely difficult, bordering on impossible. E.g. page table isolation
and call depth tracking require build-time support, BHI mitigations will
still be off without additional kernel parameters, etc.

[ bp: Touchups. ]

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420000556.2645001-3-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# c1e01cdb 02-May-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.30' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.30 stable release


# 8292f4f8 19-Apr-2024 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures

commit fe42754b94a42d08cf9501790afc25c4f6a5f631 upstream.

Rename x86's to CPU_MITIGATIONS, define it in generic code, and force it
o

cpu: Re-enable CPU mitigations by default for !X86 architectures

commit fe42754b94a42d08cf9501790afc25c4f6a5f631 upstream.

Rename x86's to CPU_MITIGATIONS, define it in generic code, and force it
on for all architectures exception x86. A recent commit to turn
mitigations off by default if SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n kinda sorta
missed that "cpu_mitigations" is completely generic, whereas
SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS is x86-specific.

Rename x86's SPECULATIVE_MITIGATIONS instead of keeping both and have it
select CPU_MITIGATIONS, as having two configs for the same thing is
unnecessary and confusing. This will also allow x86 to use the knob to
manage mitigations that aren't strictly related to speculative
execution.

Use another Kconfig to communicate to common code that CPU_MITIGATIONS
is already defined instead of having x86's menu depend on the common
CPU_MITIGATIONS. This allows keeping a single point of contact for all
of x86's mitigations, and it's not clear that other architectures *want*
to allow disabling mitigations at compile-time.

Fixes: f337a6a21e2f ("x86/cpu: Actually turn off mitigations by default for SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n")
Closes: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240413115324.53303a68%40canb.auug.org.au
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420000556.2645001-2-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# aeddf9a2 17-Apr-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.28' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.28 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26
# 2978ee7c 09-Apr-2024 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

x86/cpu: Actually turn off mitigations by default for SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n

commit f337a6a21e2fd67eadea471e93d05dd37baaa9be upstream.

Initialize cpu_mitigations to CPU_MITIGATIONS_OFF if the ke

x86/cpu: Actually turn off mitigations by default for SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n

commit f337a6a21e2fd67eadea471e93d05dd37baaa9be upstream.

Initialize cpu_mitigations to CPU_MITIGATIONS_OFF if the kernel is built
with CONFIG_SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n, as the help text quite clearly
states that disabling SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS is supposed to turn off all
mitigations by default.

│ If you say N, all mitigations will be disabled. You really
│ should know what you are doing to say so.

As is, the kernel still defaults to CPU_MITIGATIONS_AUTO, which results in
some mitigations being enabled in spite of SPECULATION_MITIGATIONS=n.

Fixes: f43b9876e857 ("x86/retbleed: Add fine grained Kconfig knobs")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240409175108.1512861-2-seanjc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23
# d0c44de2 10-Feb-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.7' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.7 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8
# b97d6790 13-Dec-2023 Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.6' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.6 stable release

Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>


Revision tags: v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1
# 53f408ca 07-Nov-2023 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier

[ Upstream commit 5c0930ccaad5a74d74e8b18b648c5eb21ed2fe94 ]

2b8272ff4a70 ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug")
sol

hrtimers: Push pending hrtimers away from outgoing CPU earlier

[ Upstream commit 5c0930ccaad5a74d74e8b18b648c5eb21ed2fe94 ]

2b8272ff4a70 ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug")
solved the straight forward CPU hotplug deadlock vs. the scheduler
bandwidth timer. Yu discovered a more involved variant where a task which
has a bandwidth timer started on the outgoing CPU holds a lock and then
gets throttled. If the lock required by one of the CPU hotplug callbacks
the hotplug operation deadlocks because the unthrottling timer event is not
handled on the dying CPU and can only be recovered once the control CPU
reaches the hotplug state which pulls the pending hrtimers from the dead
CPU.

Solve this by pushing the hrtimers away from the dying CPU in the dying
callbacks. Nothing can queue a hrtimer on the dying CPU at that point because
all other CPUs spin in stop_machine() with interrupts disabled and once the
operation is finished the CPU is marked offline.

Reported-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Liu Tie <liutie4@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a5rphara.ffs@tglx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8
# 3073f6df 17-Oct-2023 Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>

cpu/hotplug: Don't offline the last non-isolated CPU

[ Upstream commit 38685e2a0476127db766f81b1c06019ddc4c9ffa ]

If a system has isolated CPUs via the "isolcpus=" command line parameter,
then an a

cpu/hotplug: Don't offline the last non-isolated CPU

[ Upstream commit 38685e2a0476127db766f81b1c06019ddc4c9ffa ]

If a system has isolated CPUs via the "isolcpus=" command line parameter,
then an attempt to offline the last housekeeping CPU will result in a
WARN_ON() when rebuilding the scheduler domains and a subsequent panic due
to and unhandled empty CPU mas in partition_sched_domains_locked().

cpuset_hotplug_workfn()
rebuild_sched_domains_locked()
ndoms = generate_sched_domains(&doms, &attr);
cpumask_and(doms[0], top_cpuset.effective_cpus, housekeeping_cpumask(HK_FLAG_DOMAIN));

Thus results in an empty CPU mask which triggers the warning and then the
subsequent crash:

WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 80 at kernel/sched/topology.c:2366 build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408
Call trace:
build_sched_domains+0x120c/0x1408
partition_sched_domains_locked+0x234/0x880
rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798
rebuild_sched_domains+0x30/0x58
cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x2a8/0x930

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffe80027ab37080
partition_sched_domains_locked+0x318/0x880
rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x37c/0x798

Aside of the resulting crash, it does not make any sense to offline the last
last housekeeping CPU.

Prevent this by masking out the non-housekeeping CPUs when selecting a
target CPU for initiating the CPU unplug operation via the work queue.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202310171709530660462@zte.com.cn
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46
# 60edbe8e 14-Aug-2023 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

cpu/SMT: Make SMT control more robust against enumeration failures

[ Upstream commit d91bdd96b55cc3ce98d883a60f133713821b80a6 ]

The SMT control mechanism got added as speculation attack vector
miti

cpu/SMT: Make SMT control more robust against enumeration failures

[ Upstream commit d91bdd96b55cc3ce98d883a60f133713821b80a6 ]

The SMT control mechanism got added as speculation attack vector
mitigation. The implemented logic relies on the primary thread mask to
be set up properly.

This turns out to be an issue with XEN/PV guests because their CPU hotplug
mechanics do not enumerate APICs and therefore the mask is never correctly
populated.

This went unnoticed so far because by chance XEN/PV ends up with
smp_num_siblings == 2. So smt_hotplug_control stays at its default value
CPU_SMT_ENABLED and the primary thread mask is never evaluated in the
context of CPU hotplug.

This stopped "working" with the upcoming overhaul of the topology
evaluation which legitimately provides a fake topology for XEN/PV. That
sets smp_num_siblings to 1, which causes the core CPU hot-plug core to
refuse to bring up the APs.

This happens because smt_hotplug_control is set to CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED
which causes cpu_smt_allowed() to evaluate the unpopulated primary thread
mask with the conclusion that all non-boot CPUs are not valid to be
plugged.

Make cpu_smt_allowed() more robust and take CPU_SMT_NOT_SUPPORTED and
CPU_SMT_NOT_IMPLEMENTED into account. Rename it to cpu_bootable() while at
it as that makes it more clear what the function is about.

The primary mask issue on x86 XEN/PV needs to be addressed separately as
there are users outside of the CPU hotplug code too.

Fixes: 05736e4ac13c ("cpu/hotplug: Provide knobs to control SMT")
Reported-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Tested-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Tested-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Tested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230814085112.149440843@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# c900529f 12-Sep-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Forwarding to v6.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


# 23dfeae8 02-Sep-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'smp-urgent-2023-09-02' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull CPU hotplug fix from Ingo Molnar:
"Fix a CPU hotplug related deadlock between the task which initiate

Merge tag 'smp-urgent-2023-09-02' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull CPU hotplug fix from Ingo Molnar:
"Fix a CPU hotplug related deadlock between the task which initiates
and controls a CPU hot-unplug operation vs. the CFS bandwidth timer"

* tag 'smp-urgent-2023-09-02' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug

show more ...


# 1ac731c5 30-Aug-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.


# 2b8272ff 23-Aug-2023 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug

Xiongfeng reported and debugged a self deadlock of the task which initiates
and controls a CPU hot-unplug operation vs. the CFS bandwidth timer.

cpu/hotplug: Prevent self deadlock on CPU hot-unplug

Xiongfeng reported and debugged a self deadlock of the task which initiates
and controls a CPU hot-unplug operation vs. the CFS bandwidth timer.

CPU1 CPU2

T1 sets cfs_quota
starts hrtimer cfs_bandwidth 'period_timer'
T1 is migrated to CPU2
T1 initiates offlining of CPU1
Hotplug operation starts
...
'period_timer' expires and is re-enqueued on CPU1
...
take_cpu_down()
CPU1 shuts down and does not handle timers
anymore. They have to be migrated in the
post dead hotplug steps by the control task.

T1 runs the post dead offline operation
T1 is scheduled out
T1 waits for 'period_timer' to expire

T1 waits there forever if it is scheduled out before it can execute the hrtimer
offline callback hrtimers_dead_cpu().

Cure this by delegating the hotplug control operation to a worker thread on
an online CPU. This takes the initiating user space task, which might be
affected by the bandwidth timer, completely out of the picture.

Reported-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8e785777-03aa-99e1-d20e-e956f5685be6@huawei.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h6oqdq0i.ffs@tglx

show more ...


# 6f49693a 28-Aug-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'smp-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull CPU hotplug updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"Updates for the CPU hotplug core:

- Support partial SMT

Merge tag 'smp-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull CPU hotplug updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"Updates for the CPU hotplug core:

- Support partial SMT enablement.

So far the sysfs SMT control only allows to toggle between SMT on
and off. That's sufficient for x86 which usually has at max two
threads except for the Xeon PHI platform which has four threads per
core

Though PowerPC has up to 16 threads per core and so far it's only
possible to control the number of enabled threads per core via a
command line option. There is some way to control this at runtime,
but that lacks enforcement and the usability is awkward

This update expands the sysfs interface and the core infrastructure
to accept numerical values so PowerPC can build SMT runtime control
for partial SMT enablement on top

The core support has also been provided to the PowerPC maintainers
who added the PowerPC related changes on top

- Minor cleanups and documentation updates"

* tag 'smp-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
Documentation: core-api/cpuhotplug: Fix state names
cpu/hotplug: Remove unused function declaration cpu_set_state_online()
cpu/SMT: Fix cpu_smt_possible() comment
cpu/SMT: Allow enabling partial SMT states via sysfs
cpu/SMT: Create topology_smt_thread_allowed()
cpu/SMT: Remove topology_smt_supported()
cpu/SMT: Store the current/max number of threads
cpu/SMT: Move smt/control simple exit cases earlier
cpu/SMT: Move SMT prototypes into cpu_smt.h
cpu/hotplug: Remove dependancy against cpu_primary_thread_mask

show more ...


# 15f63e30 14-Aug-2023 Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

Merge branch 'topic/cpu-smt' into next

Merge SMT changes we are sharing with the tip tree.


12345678910>>...88