Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable

Merge tag 'v6.5/vfs.mount' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs

Pull vfs mount updates from Christian Brauner:
"This contains the work to extend move_mount() to allow adding a m

Merge tag 'v6.5/vfs.mount' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs

Pull vfs mount updates from Christian Brauner:
"This contains the work to extend move_mount() to allow adding a mount
beneath the topmost mount of a mount stack.

There are two LWN articles about this. One covers the original patch
series in [1]. The other in [2] summarizes the session and roughly the
discussion between Al and me at LSFMM. The second article also goes
into some good questions from attendees.

Since all details are found in the relevant commit with a technical
dive into semantics and locking at the end I'm only adding the
motivation and core functionality for this from commit message and
leave out the invasive details. The code is also heavily commented and
annotated as well which was explicitly requested.

TL;DR:

> mount -t ext4 /dev/sda /mnt
|
└─/mnt /dev/sda ext4

> mount --beneath -t xfs /dev/sdb /mnt
|
└─/mnt /dev/sdb xfs
└─/mnt /dev/sda ext4

> umount /mnt
|
└─/mnt /dev/sdb xfs

The longer motivation is that various distributions are adding or are
in the process of adding support for system extensions and in the
future configuration extensions through various tools. A more detailed
explanation on system and configuration extensions can be found on the
manpage which is listed below at [3].

System extension images may – dynamically at runtime — extend the
/usr/ and /opt/ directory hierarchies with additional files. This is
particularly useful on immutable system images where a /usr/ and/or
/opt/ hierarchy residing on a read-only file system shall be extended
temporarily at runtime without making any persistent modifications.

When one or more system extension images are activated, their /usr/
and /opt/ hierarchies are combined via overlayfs with the same
hierarchies of the host OS, and the host /usr/ and /opt/ overmounted
with it ("merging"). When they are deactivated, the mount point is
disassembled — again revealing the unmodified original host version of
the hierarchy ("unmerging"). Merging thus makes the extension's
resources suddenly appear below the /usr/ and /opt/ hierarchies as if
they were included in the base OS image itself. Unmerging makes them
disappear again, leaving in place only the files that were shipped
with the base OS image itself.

System configuration images are similar but operate on directories
containing system or service configuration.

On nearly all modern distributions mount propagation plays a crucial
role and the rootfs of the OS is a shared mount in a peer group
(usually with peer group id 1):

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/ / ext4 shared:1 29 1

On such systems all services and containers run in a separate mount
namespace and are pivot_root()ed into their rootfs. A separate mount
namespace is almost always used as it is the minimal isolation
mechanism services have. But usually they are even much more isolated
up to the point where they almost become indistinguishable from
containers.

Mount propagation again plays a crucial role here. The rootfs of all
these services is a slave mount to the peer group of the host rootfs.
This is done so the service will receive mount propagation events from
the host when certain files or directories are updated.

In addition, the rootfs of each service, container, and sandbox is
also a shared mount in its separate peer group:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/ / ext4 shared:24 master:1 71 47

For people not too familiar with mount propagation, the master:1 means
that this is a slave mount to peer group 1. Which as one can see is
the host rootfs as indicated by shared:1 above. The shared:24
indicates that the service rootfs is a shared mount in a separate peer
group with peer group id 24.

A service may run other services. Such nested services will also have
a rootfs mount that is a slave to the peer group of the outer service
rootfs mount.

For containers things are just slighly different. A container's rootfs
isn't a slave to the service's or host rootfs' peer group. The rootfs
mount of a container is simply a shared mount in its own peer group:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/home/ubuntu/debian-tree / ext4 shared:99 61 60

So whereas services are isolated OS components a container is treated
like a separate world and mount propagation into it is restricted to a
single well known mount that is a slave to the peer group of the
shared mount /run on the host:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/propagate/debian-tree /run/host/incoming tmpfs master:5 71 68

Here, the master:5 indicates that this mount is a slave to the peer
group with peer group id 5. This allows to propagate mounts into the
container and served as a workaround for not being able to insert
mounts into mount namespaces directly. But the new mount api does
support inserting mounts directly. For the interested reader the
blogpost in [4] might be worth reading where I explain the old and the
new approach to inserting mounts into mount namespaces.

Containers of course, can themselves be run as services. They often
run full systems themselves which means they again run services and
containers with the exact same propagation settings explained above.

The whole system is designed so that it can be easily updated,
including all services in various fine-grained ways without having to
enter every single service's mount namespace which would be
prohibitively expensive. The mount propagation layout has been
carefully chosen so it is possible to propagate updates for system
extensions and configurations from the host into all services.

The simplest model to update the whole system is to mount on top of
/usr, /opt, or /etc on the host. The new mount on /usr, /opt, or /etc
will then propagate into every service. This works cleanly the first
time. However, when the system is updated multiple times it becomes
necessary to unmount the first update on /opt, /usr, /etc and then
propagate the new update. But this means, there's an interval where
the old base system is accessible. This has to be avoided to protect
against downgrade attacks.

The vfs already exposes a mechanism to userspace whereby mounts can be
mounted beneath an existing mount. Such mounts are internally referred
to as "tucked". The patch series exposes the ability to mount beneath
a top mount through the new MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH flag for the
move_mount() system call. This allows userspace to seamlessly upgrade
mounts. After this series the only thing that will have changed is
that mounting beneath an existing mount can be done explicitly instead
of just implicitly.

The crux is that the proposed mechanism already exists and that it is
so powerful as to cover cases where mounts are supposed to be updated
with new versions. Crucially, it offers an important flexibility.
Namely that updates to a system may either be forced or can be delayed
and the umount of the top mount be left to a service if it is a
cooperative one"

Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/927491 [1]
Link: https://lwn.net/Articles/934094 [2]
Link: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-sysext.8.html [3]
Link: https://brauner.io/2023/02/28/mounting-into-mount-namespaces.html [4]
Link: https://github.com/flatcar/sysext-bakery
Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_1
Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_2
Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26013

* tag 'v6.5/vfs.mount' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs:
fs: allow to mount beneath top mount
fs: use a for loop when locking a mount
fs: properly document __lookup_mnt()
fs: add path_mounted()

show more ...

fs: allow to mount beneath top mount

Various distributions are adding or are in the process of adding support
for system extensions and in the future configuration extensions through
various tools.

fs: allow to mount beneath top mount

Various distributions are adding or are in the process of adding support
for system extensions and in the future configuration extensions through
various tools. A more detailed explanation on system and configuration
extensions can be found on the manpage which is listed below at [1].

System extension images may – dynamically at runtime — extend the /usr/
and /opt/ directory hierarchies with additional files. This is
particularly useful on immutable system images where a /usr/ and/or
/opt/ hierarchy residing on a read-only file system shall be extended
temporarily at runtime without making any persistent modifications.

When one or more system extension images are activated, their /usr/ and
/opt/ hierarchies are combined via overlayfs with the same hierarchies
of the host OS, and the host /usr/ and /opt/ overmounted with it
("merging"). When they are deactivated, the mount point is disassembled
— again revealing the unmodified original host version of the hierarchy
("unmerging"). Merging thus makes the extension's resources suddenly
appear below the /usr/ and /opt/ hierarchies as if they were included in
the base OS image itself. Unmerging makes them disappear again, leaving
in place only the files that were shipped with the base OS image itself.

System configuration images are similar but operate on directories
containing system or service configuration.

On nearly all modern distributions mount propagation plays a crucial
role and the rootfs of the OS is a shared mount in a peer group (usually
with peer group id 1):

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/ / ext4 shared:1 29 1

On such systems all services and containers run in a separate mount
namespace and are pivot_root()ed into their rootfs. A separate mount
namespace is almost always used as it is the minimal isolation mechanism
services have. But usually they are even much more isolated up to the
point where they almost become indistinguishable from containers.

Mount propagation again plays a crucial role here. The rootfs of all
these services is a slave mount to the peer group of the host rootfs.
This is done so the service will receive mount propagation events from
the host when certain files or directories are updated.

In addition, the rootfs of each service, container, and sandbox is also
a shared mount in its separate peer group:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/ / ext4 shared:24 master:1 71 47

For people not too familiar with mount propagation, the master:1 means
that this is a slave mount to peer group 1. Which as one can see is the
host rootfs as indicated by shared:1 above. The shared:24 indicates that
the service rootfs is a shared mount in a separate peer group with peer
group id 24.

A service may run other services. Such nested services will also have a
rootfs mount that is a slave to the peer group of the outer service
rootfs mount.

For containers things are just slighly different. A container's rootfs
isn't a slave to the service's or host rootfs' peer group. The rootfs
mount of a container is simply a shared mount in its own peer group:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/home/ubuntu/debian-tree / ext4 shared:99 61 60

So whereas services are isolated OS components a container is treated
like a separate world and mount propagation into it is restricted to a
single well known mount that is a slave to the peer group of the shared
mount /run on the host:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION MNT_ID PARENT_ID
/propagate/debian-tree /run/host/incoming tmpfs master:5 71 68

Here, the master:5 indicates that this mount is a slave to the peer
group with peer group id 5. This allows to propagate mounts into the
container and served as a workaround for not being able to insert mounts
into mount namespaces directly. But the new mount api does support
inserting mounts directly. For the interested reader the blogpost in [2]
might be worth reading where I explain the old and the new approach to
inserting mounts into mount namespaces.

Containers of course, can themselves be run as services. They often run
full systems themselves which means they again run services and
containers with the exact same propagation settings explained above.

The whole system is designed so that it can be easily updated, including
all services in various fine-grained ways without having to enter every
single service's mount namespace which would be prohibitively expensive.
The mount propagation layout has been carefully chosen so it is possible
to propagate updates for system extensions and configurations from the
host into all services.

The simplest model to update the whole system is to mount on top of
/usr, /opt, or /etc on the host. The new mount on /usr, /opt, or /etc
will then propagate into every service. This works cleanly the first
time. However, when the system is updated multiple times it becomes
necessary to unmount the first update on /opt, /usr, /etc and then
propagate the new update. But this means, there's an interval where the
old base system is accessible. This has to be avoided to protect against
downgrade attacks.

The vfs already exposes a mechanism to userspace whereby mounts can be
mounted beneath an existing mount. Such mounts are internally referred
to as "tucked". The patch series exposes the ability to mount beneath a
top mount through the new MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH flag for the move_mount()
system call. This allows userspace to seamlessly upgrade mounts. After
this series the only thing that will have changed is that mounting
beneath an existing mount can be done explicitly instead of just
implicitly.

Today, there are two scenarios where a mount can be mounted beneath an
existing mount instead of on top of it:

(1) When a service or container is started in a new mount namespace and
pivot_root()s into its new rootfs. The way this is done is by
mounting the new rootfs beneath the old rootfs:

fd_newroot = open("/var/lib/machines/fedora", ...);
fd_oldroot = open("/", ...);
fchdir(fd_newroot);
pivot_root(".", ".");

After the pivot_root(".", ".") call the new rootfs is mounted
beneath the old rootfs which can then be unmounted to reveal the
underlying mount:

fchdir(fd_oldroot);
umount2(".", MNT_DETACH);

Since pivot_root() moves the caller into a new rootfs no mounts must
be propagated out of the new rootfs as a consequence of the
pivot_root() call. Thus, the mounts cannot be shared.

(2) When a mount is propagated to a mount that already has another mount
mounted on the same dentry.

The easiest example for this is to create a new mount namespace. The
following commands will create a mount namespace where the rootfs
mount / will be a slave to the peer group of the host rootfs /
mount's peer group. IOW, it will receive propagation from the host:

mount --make-shared /
unshare --mount --propagation=slave

Now a new mount on the /mnt dentry in that mount namespace is
created. (As it can be confusing it should be spelled out that the
tmpfs mount on the /mnt dentry that was just created doesn't
propagate back to the host because the rootfs mount / of the mount
namespace isn't a peer of the host rootfs.):

mount -t tmpfs tmpfs /mnt

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION
└─/mnt tmpfs tmpfs

Now another terminal in the host mount namespace can observe that
the mount indeed hasn't propagated back to into the host mount
namespace. A new mount can now be created on top of the /mnt dentry
with the rootfs mount / as its parent:

mount --bind /opt /mnt

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION
└─/mnt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 shared:1

The mount namespace that was created earlier can now observe that
the bind mount created on the host has propagated into it:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE PROPAGATION
└─/mnt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 master:1
└─/mnt tmpfs tmpfs

But instead of having been mounted on top of the tmpfs mount at the
/mnt dentry the /opt mount has been mounted on top of the rootfs
mount at the /mnt dentry. And the tmpfs mount has been remounted on
top of the propagated /opt mount at the /opt dentry. So in other
words, the propagated mount has been mounted beneath the preexisting
mount in that mount namespace.

Mount namespaces make this easy to illustrate but it's also easy to
mount beneath an existing mount in the same mount namespace
(The following example assumes a shared rootfs mount / with peer
group id 1):

mount --bind /opt /opt

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE MNT_ID PARENT_ID PROPAGATION
└─/opt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 188 29 shared:1

If another mount is mounted on top of the /opt mount at the /opt
dentry:

mount --bind /tmp /opt

The following clunky mount tree will result:

TARGET SOURCE FSTYPE MNT_ID PARENT_ID PROPAGATION
└─/opt /dev/sda2[/tmp] ext4 405 29 shared:1
└─/opt /dev/sda2[/opt] ext4 188 405 shared:1
└─/opt /dev/sda2[/tmp] ext4 404 188 shared:1

The /tmp mount is mounted beneath the /opt mount and another copy is
mounted on top of the /opt mount. This happens because the rootfs /
and the /opt mount are shared mounts in the same peer group.

When the new /tmp mount is supposed to be mounted at the /opt dentry
then the /tmp mount first propagates to the root mount at the /opt
dentry. But there already is the /opt mount mounted at the /opt
dentry. So the old /opt mount at the /opt dentry will be mounted on
top of the new /tmp mount at the /tmp dentry, i.e. @opt->mnt_parent
is @tmp and @opt->mnt_mountpoint is /tmp (Note that @opt->mnt_root
is /opt which is what shows up as /opt under SOURCE). So again, a
mount will be mounted beneath a preexisting mount.

(Fwiw, a few iterations of mount --bind /opt /opt in a loop on a
shared rootfs is a good example of what could be referred to as
mount explosion.)

The main point is that such mounts allows userspace to umount a top
mount and reveal an underlying mount. So for example, umounting the
tmpfs mount on /mnt that was created in example (1) using mount
namespaces reveals the /opt mount which was mounted beneath it.

In (2) where a mount was mounted beneath the top mount in the same mount
namespace unmounting the top mount would unmount both the top mount and
the mount beneath. In the process the original mount would be remounted
on top of the rootfs mount / at the /opt dentry again.

This again, is a result of mount propagation only this time it's umount
propagation. However, this can be avoided by simply making the parent
mount / of the @opt mount a private or slave mount. Then the top mount
and the original mount can be unmounted to reveal the mount beneath.

These two examples are fairly arcane and are merely added to make it
clear how mount propagation has effects on current and future features.

More common use-cases will just be things like:

mount -t btrfs /dev/sdA /mnt
mount -t xfs /dev/sdB --beneath /mnt
umount /mnt

after which we'll have updated from a btrfs filesystem to a xfs
filesystem without ever revealing the underlying mountpoint.

The crux is that the proposed mechanism already exists and that it is so
powerful as to cover cases where mounts are supposed to be updated with
new versions. Crucially, it offers an important flexibility. Namely that
updates to a system may either be forced or can be delayed and the
umount of the top mount be left to a service if it is a cooperative one.

This adds a new flag to move_mount() that allows to explicitly move a
beneath the top mount adhering to the following semantics:

* Mounts cannot be mounted beneath the rootfs. This restriction
encompasses the rootfs but also chroots via chroot() and pivot_root().
To mount a mount beneath the rootfs or a chroot, pivot_root() can be
used as illustrated above.
* The source mount must be a private mount to force the kernel to
allocate a new, unused peer group id. This isn't a required
restriction but a voluntary one. It avoids repeating a semantical
quirk that already exists today. If bind mounts which already have a
peer group id are inserted into mount trees that have the same peer
group id this can cause a lot of mount propagation events to be
generated (For example, consider running mount --bind /opt /opt in a
loop where the parent mount is a shared mount.).
* Avoid getting rid of the top mount in the kernel. Cooperative services
need to be able to unmount the top mount themselves.
This also avoids a good deal of additional complexity. The umount
would have to be propagated which would be another rather expensive
operation. So namespace_lock() and lock_mount_hash() would potentially
have to be held for a long time for both a mount and umount
propagation. That should be avoided.
* The path to mount beneath must be mounted and attached.
* The top mount and its parent must be in the caller's mount namespace
and the caller must be able to mount in that mount namespace.
* The caller must be able to unmount the top mount to prove that they
could reveal the underlying mount.
* The propagation tree is calculated based on the destination mount's
parent mount and the destination mount's mountpoint on the parent
mount. Of course, if the parent of the destination mount and the
destination mount are shared mounts in the same peer group and the
mountpoint of the new mount to be mounted is a subdir of their
->mnt_root then both will receive a mount of /opt. That's probably
easier to understand with an example. Assuming a standard shared
rootfs /:

mount --bind /opt /opt
mount --bind /tmp /opt

will cause the same mount tree as:

mount --bind /opt /opt
mount --beneath /tmp /opt

because both / and /opt are shared mounts/peers in the same peer
group and the /opt dentry is a subdirectory of both the parent's and
the child's ->mnt_root. If a mount tree like that is created it almost
always is an accident or abuse of mount propagation. Realistically
what most people probably mean in this scenarios is:

mount --bind /opt /opt
mount --make-private /opt
mount --make-shared /opt

This forces the allocation of a new separate peer group for the /opt
mount. Aferwards a mount --bind or mount --beneath actually makes
sense as the / and /opt mount belong to different peer groups. Before
that it's likely just confusion about what the user wanted to achieve.
* Refuse MOVE_MOUNT_BENEATH if:
(1) the @mnt_from has been overmounted in between path resolution and
acquiring @namespace_sem when locking @mnt_to. This avoids the
proliferation of shadow mounts.
(2) if @to_mnt is moved to a different mountpoint while acquiring
@namespace_sem to lock @to_mnt.
(3) if @to_mnt is unmounted while acquiring @namespace_sem to lock
@to_mnt.
(4) if the parent of the target mount propagates to the target mount
at the same mountpoint.
This would mean mounting @mnt_from on @mnt_to->mnt_parent and then
propagating a copy @c of @mnt_from onto @mnt_to. This defeats the
whole purpose of mounting @mnt_from beneath @mnt_to.
(5) if the parent mount @mnt_to->mnt_parent propagates to @mnt_from at
the same mountpoint.
If @mnt_to->mnt_parent propagates to @mnt_from this would mean
propagating a copy @c of @mnt_from on top of @mnt_from. Afterwards
@mnt_from would be mounted on top of @mnt_to->mnt_parent and
@mnt_to would be unmounted from @mnt->mnt_parent and remounted on
@mnt_from. But since @c is already mounted on @mnt_from, @mnt_to
would ultimately be remounted on top of @c. Afterwards, @mnt_from
would be covered by a copy @c of @mnt_from and @c would be covered
by @mnt_from itself. This defeats the whole purpose of mounting
@mnt_from beneath @mnt_to.
Cases (1) to (3) are required as they deal with races that would cause
bugs or unexpected behavior for users. Cases (4) and (5) refuse
semantical quirks that would not be a bug but would cause weird mount
trees to be created. While they can already be created via other means
(mount --bind /opt /opt x n) there's no reason to repeat past mistakes
in new features.

Link: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/systemd-sysext.8.html [1]
Link: https://brauner.io/2023/02/28/mounting-into-mount-namespaces.html [2]
Link: https://github.com/flatcar/sysext-bakery
Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_1
Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unified_Kernel_Support_Phase_2
Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26013

Reviewed-by: Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) <sforshee@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20230202-fs-move-mount-replace-v4-4-98f3d80d7eaa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>

show more ...

Merge tag 'v5.13-rc2' into spi-5.13

Linux 5.13-rc2

Merge branch 'fixes-rc1' into fixes

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 5.13 merge window.

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc8' into sched/core, to pick up fixes

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc7' into ecryptfs/next

Required to pick up idmapped mount changes which changed some function
parameters.

Merge tags 'ib-mfd-clk-gpio-regulator-rtc-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-extcon-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-input-v5.13-1', 'ib-mfd-platform-x86-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-power-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-pwm-rtc-v5.13-1' and 'ib-regulator-list-ram

Merge tags 'ib-mfd-clk-gpio-regulator-rtc-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-extcon-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-input-v5.13-1', 'ib-mfd-platform-x86-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-power-v5.13', 'ib-mfd-pwm-rtc-v5.13-1' and 'ib-regulator-list-ramp-helpers-v5.13' into ibs-for-mfd-merged

Immutable branch between MFD, Clock, GPIO, Regulator and RTC due for the v5.13 merge window

Immutable branch between MFD and Extcon due for the v5.13 merge window

Immutable branch between MFD and Input due for the v5.13 merge window

Immutable branch between MFD and Platform/x86 due for the v5.13 merge window

Immutable branch between MFD and Power due for the v5.13 merge window

Immutable branch between MFD, PWM and RTC due for the v5.13 merge window

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Sync up with topic/i915-gem-next and drm-intel-gt-next.

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Merge series "Support ROHM BD71815 PMIC" from Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>:

Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC

ROHM BD71815 is a power management IC used

Merge series "Support ROHM BD71815 PMIC" from Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>:

Patch series introducing support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC

ROHM BD71815 is a power management IC used in some battery powered
systems. It contains regulators, GPO(s), charger + coulomb counter, RTC
and a clock gate.

All regulators can be controlled via I2C. LDO4 can additionally be set to
be enabled/disabled by a GPIO. LDO3 voltage could be selected from two
voltages written into separate VSEL reisters using GPIO but this mode is
not supported by driver. On top of that the PMIC has the typical HW
state machine which is present also on many other ROHM PMICs.

IC contains two GPOs - but one of the GPOs is marked as GND in
data-sheet. Thus the driver by default only exposes one GPO. The second
GPO can be enabled by special DT property.

RTC is almost similar to what is on BD71828. For currently used features
only the register address offset to RTC block differs.

The charger driver is not included in this series. ROHM has a charger
driver with some fuel-gauging logig written in but this is not included
here. I am working on separating the logic from HW specific driver and
supporting both BD71815 and BD71828 chargers in separate patch series.

Changelog v5:
Regulator:
- Added regmap helper for regulator ramp-delay and taken it in use
(patches 13, 14, 16 - they can be just dropped if ramp-delay helper is not
a good idea. Patch 15 implements old-fashioned ramp-delay)
GPIO:
- styling changes to GPIO (Mostly suggested by Andy)
- implemented init_valid_mask (but can't count on it yet)
Changelog v4:
- Sorted ROHM chip ID enum
- Statcized DVS structures in regulator driver
- Minor styling for regulator driver
- rebased on v5.12-rc4
Changelog v3:
- GPIO clean-up as suggested by Bartosz
- MFD clean-up as suggested by Lee
- clk-mode dt-binding handling in MFD driver corrected to reflect new
property values.
- Dropped already applied patches
- Rebased on v5.12-rc2
Changelog v2:
- Rebased on top of v5.11-rc3
- Added another "preliminary patch" which fixes HW-dvs voltage
handling (patch 1)
- split regulator patch to two.
- changed dt-binding patch ordering.
regulators:
- staticized probe
- removed some unnecessary defines
- updated comments
- split rohm-regulator patch adding SNVS and supporting simple
linear mapping into two - one adding support for mapping, other
adding SNVS.
GPIO:
- removed unnecessary headers
- clarified dev/parent->dev usage
- removed forgotten #define DEBUG
dt-bindings:
- changed patch order to meet ref-dependencies
- added missing regulator nodes
- changed string property for clk mode to tristated
MFD:
- header cleanups.
CLK:
- fixed commit message

--

Matti Vaittinen (19):
rtc: bd70528: Do not require parent data
mfd: bd718x7: simplify by cleaning unnecessary device data
dt_bindings: bd71828: Add clock output mode
dt_bindings: regulator: Add ROHM BD71815 PMIC regulators
dt_bindings: mfd: Add ROHM BD71815 PMIC
mfd: Add ROHM BD71815 ID
mfd: Sort ROHM chip ID list for better readability
mfd: Support for ROHM BD71815 PMIC core
gpio: support ROHM BD71815 GPOs
regulator: helpers: Export helper voltage listing
regulator: rohm-regulator: linear voltage support
regulator: rohm-regulator: Support SNVS HW state.
regulator: Add regmap helper for ramp-delay setting
regulator: bd718x7, bd71828: Use ramp-delay helper
regulator: Support ROHM BD71815 regulators
regulator: bd71815: use ramp-delay helper
clk: bd718x7: Add support for clk gate on ROHM BD71815 PMIC
rtc: bd70528: Support RTC on ROHM BD71815
MAINTAINERS: Add ROHM BD71815AGW

.../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71815-pmic.yaml | 201 ++++++
.../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71828-pmic.yaml | 6 +
.../regulator/rohm,bd71815-regulator.yaml | 116 ++++
MAINTAINERS | 3 +
drivers/clk/clk-bd718x7.c | 9 +-
drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 10 +
drivers/gpio/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c | 193 ++++++
drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 15 +-
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd71828.c | 486 +++++++++----
drivers/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.c | 43 +-
drivers/regulator/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/regulator/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/regulator/bd71815-regulator.c | 651 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/regulator/bd71828-regulator.c | 51 +-
drivers/regulator/bd718x7-regulator.c | 60 +-
drivers/regulator/helpers.c | 101 ++-
drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c | 23 +-
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 6 +-
drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c | 104 +--
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h | 562 +++++++++++++++
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h | 3 +
include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd718x7.h | 13 -
include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h | 15 +-
include/linux/regulator/driver.h | 7 +
25 files changed, 2393 insertions(+), 298 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71815-pmic.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/rohm,bd71815-regulator.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/gpio-bd71815.c
create mode 100644 drivers/regulator/bd71815-regulator.c
create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h

base-commit: 0d02ec6b3136c73c09e7859f0d0e4e2c4c07b49b
--
2.25.4

--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]

show more ...

Merge tag 'mute-led-rework' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound into asoc-5.13

ALSA: control - add generic LED API

This patchset tries to resolve the diversity in the aud

Merge tag 'mute-led-rework' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound into asoc-5.13

ALSA: control - add generic LED API

This patchset tries to resolve the diversity in the audio LED
control among the ALSA drivers. A new control layer registration
is introduced which allows to run additional operations on
top of the elementary ALSA sound controls.

A new control access group (three bits in the access flags)
was introduced to carry the LED group information for
the sound controls. The low-level sound drivers can just
mark those controls using this access group. This information
is not exported to the user space, but user space can
manage the LED sound control associations through sysfs
(last patch) per Mark's request. It makes things fully
configurable in the kernel and user space (UCM).

The actual state ('route') evaluation is really easy
(the minimal value check for all channels / controls / cards).
If there's more complicated logic for a given hardware,
the card driver may eventually export a new read-only
sound control for the LED group and do the logic itself.

The new LED trigger control code is completely separated
and possibly optional (there's no symbol dependency).
The full code separation allows eventually to move this
LED trigger control to the user space in future.
Actually it replaces the already present functionality
in the kernel space (HDA drivers) and allows a quick adoption
for the recent hardware (ASoC codecs including SoundWire).

snd_ctl_led 24576 0

The sound driver implementation is really easy:

1) call snd_ctl_led_request() when control LED layer should be
automatically activated
/ it calls module_request("snd-ctl-led") on demand /
2) mark all related kcontrols with
SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SPK_LED or
SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_MIC_LED

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210317172945.842280-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

show more ...

Merge tag 'tags/mute-led-rework' into for-next

ALSA: control - add generic LED API

This patchset tries to resolve the diversity in the audio LED
control among the ALSA drivers. A new control layer

Merge tag 'tags/mute-led-rework' into for-next

ALSA: control - add generic LED API

This patchset tries to resolve the diversity in the audio LED
control among the ALSA drivers. A new control layer registration
is introduced which allows to run additional operations on
top of the elementary ALSA sound controls.

A new control access group (three bits in the access flags)
was introduced to carry the LED group information for
the sound controls. The low-level sound drivers can just
mark those controls using this access group. This information
is not exported to the user space, but user space can
manage the LED sound control associations through sysfs
(last patch) per Mark's request. It makes things fully
configurable in the kernel and user space (UCM).

The actual state ('route') evaluation is really easy
(the minimal value check for all channels / controls / cards).
If there's more complicated logic for a given hardware,
the card driver may eventually export a new read-only
sound control for the LED group and do the logic itself.

The new LED trigger control code is completely separated
and possibly optional (there's no symbol dependency).
The full code separation allows eventually to move this
LED trigger control to the user space in future.
Actually it replaces the already present functionality
in the kernel space (HDA drivers) and allows a quick adoption
for the recent hardware (ASoC codecs including SoundWire).

snd_ctl_led 24576 0

The sound driver implementation is really easy:

1) call snd_ctl_led_request() when control LED layer should be
automatically activated
/ it calls module_request("snd-ctl-led") on demand /
2) mark all related kcontrols with
SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_SPK_LED or
SNDRV_CTL_ELEM_ACCESS_MIC_LED

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210317172945.842280-1-perex@perex.cz
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

show more ...

Merge remote-tracking branch 'torvalds/master' into perf/core

To pick up fixes sent via perf/urgent and in the BPF tools/ directories.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc4' into next

Sync up with the mainline to bring in newest APIs.

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc3' into kvm-arm64/host-stage2

Linux 5.12-rc3

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

# gpg: Signature made Sun 14 Mar 2021 21:41:02 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc3' into kvm-arm64/host-stage2

Linux 5.12-rc3

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

# gpg: Signature made Sun 14 Mar 2021 21:41:02 GMT
# gpg: using RSA key ABAF11C65A2970B130ABE3C479BE3E4300411886
# gpg: issuer "torvalds@linux-foundation.org"
# gpg: Can't check signature: No public key

show more ...

Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core, to pick up dependent commits

We are applying further, lower-prio fixes on top of two ww_mutex fixes in locking/urgent.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <m

Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core, to pick up dependent commits

We are applying further, lower-prio fixes on top of two ww_mutex fixes in locking/urgent.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

show more ...

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc3' into x86/seves

Pick up dependent SEV-ES urgent changes which went into -rc3 to base new
work ontop.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>

Merge tag 'v5.12-rc3' into x86/cleanups, to refresh the tree

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>