History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/ext4/extents_status.c (Results 1 – 25 of 595)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.67, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.6.64, v6.6.63, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57, v6.6.56, v6.6.55, v6.6.54, v6.6.53, v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49, v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46, v6.6.45
# 7e24a55b 04-Aug-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.44' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.44 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.44, v6.6.43, v6.6.42, v6.6.41, v6.6.40, v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31
# c6e67df6 15-May-2024 Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@linux.dev>

ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit

[ Upstream commit 907c3fe532253a6ef4eb9c4d67efb71fab58c706 ]

When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an
uninitialized exte

ext4: fix infinite loop when replaying fast_commit

[ Upstream commit 907c3fe532253a6ef4eb9c4d67efb71fab58c706 ]

When doing fast_commit replay an infinite loop may occur due to an
uninitialized extent_status struct. ext4_ext_determine_insert_hole() does
not detect the replay and calls ext4_es_find_extent_range(), which will
return immediately without initializing the 'es' variable.

Because 'es' contains garbage, an integer overflow may happen causing an
infinite loop in this function, easily reproducible using fstest generic/039.

This commit fixes this issue by unconditionally initializing the structure
in function ext4_es_find_extent_range().

Thanks to Zhang Yi, for figuring out the real problem!

Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques (SUSE) <luis.henriques@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240515082857.32730-1-luis.henriques@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.30, v6.6.29, v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8
# b97d6790 13-Dec-2023 Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.6' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.6 stable release

Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>


Revision tags: v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48
# afe944f1 24-Aug-2023 Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

ext4: correct the start block of counting reserved clusters

commit 40ea98396a3659062267d1fe5f99af4f7e4f05e3 upstream.

When big allocate feature is enabled, we need to count and update
reserved clus

ext4: correct the start block of counting reserved clusters

commit 40ea98396a3659062267d1fe5f99af4f7e4f05e3 upstream.

When big allocate feature is enabled, we need to count and update
reserved clusters before removing a delayed only extent_status entry.
{init|count|get}_rsvd() have already done this, but the start block
number of this counting isn't correct in the following case.

lblk end
| |
v v
-------------------------
| | orig_es
-------------------------
^ ^
len1 is 0 | len2 |

If the start block of the orig_es entry founded is bigger than lblk, we
passed lblk as start block to count_rsvd(), but the length is correct,
finally, the range to be counted is offset. This patch fix this by
passing the start blocks to 'orig_es->lblk + len1'.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824092619.1327976-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# 3bc20238 24-Aug-2023 Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail

commit 8e387c89e96b9543a339f84043cf9df15fed2632 upstream.

__insert_pending() allocate memory in atomic context, so the allocation
could fail, but we

ext4: make sure allocate pending entry not fail

commit 8e387c89e96b9543a339f84043cf9df15fed2632 upstream.

__insert_pending() allocate memory in atomic context, so the allocation
could fail, but we are not handling that failure now. It could lead
ext4_es_remove_extent() to get wrong reserved clusters, and the global
data blocks reservation count will be incorrect. The same to
extents_status entry preallocation, preallocate pending entry out of the
i_es_lock with __GFP_NOFAIL, make sure __insert_pending() and
__revise_pending() always succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230824092619.1327976-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# c900529f 12-Sep-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Forwarding to v6.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


# 3ef96fcf 31-Aug-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus-6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Many ext4 and jbd2 cleanups and bug fixes:

- Cleanups in the ext

Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus-6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Many ext4 and jbd2 cleanups and bug fixes:

- Cleanups in the ext4 remount code when going to and from read-only

- Cleanups in ext4's multiblock allocator

- Cleanups in the jbd2 setup/mounting code paths

- Performance improvements when appending to a delayed allocation file

- Miscellaneous syzbot and other bug fixes"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus-6.6-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (60 commits)
ext4: fix slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent()
libfs: remove redundant checks of s_encoding
ext4: remove redundant checks of s_encoding
ext4: reject casefold inode flag without casefold feature
ext4: use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head in mballoc.c
ext4: do not mark inode dirty every time when appending using delalloc
ext4: rename s_error_work to s_sb_upd_work
ext4: add periodic superblock update check
ext4: drop dio overwrite only flag and associated warning
ext4: add correct group descriptors and reserved GDT blocks to system zone
ext4: remove unused function declaration
ext4: mballoc: avoid garbage value from err
ext4: use sbi instead of EXT4_SB(sb) in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple()
ext4: change the type of blocksize in ext4_mb_init_cache()
ext4: fix unttached inode after power cut with orphan file feature enabled
jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range
ext4: ext4_get_{dev}_journal return proper error value
ext4: cleanup ext4_get_dev_journal() and ext4_get_journal()
jbd2: jbd2_journal_init_{dev,inode} return proper error return value
jbd2: drop useless error tag in jbd2_journal_wipe()
...

show more ...


# 1ac731c5 30-Aug-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.


Revision tags: v6.1.46
# 768d612f 15-Aug-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: fix slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent()

Yikebaer reported an issue:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_ins

ext4: fix slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent()

Yikebaer reported an issue:
==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0
fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894
Read of size 4 at addr ffff888112ecc1a4 by task syz-executor/8438

CPU: 1 PID: 8438 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.5.0-rc5 #1
Call Trace:
[...]
kasan_report+0xba/0xf0 mm/kasan/report.c:588
ext4_es_insert_extent+0xc68/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:894
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]

Allocated by task 8438:
[...]
kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:693 [inline]
__es_alloc_extent fs/ext4/extents_status.c:469 [inline]
ext4_es_insert_extent+0x672/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:873
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]

Freed by task 8438:
[...]
kmem_cache_free+0xec/0x490 mm/slub.c:3823
ext4_es_try_to_merge_right fs/ext4/extents_status.c:593 [inline]
__es_insert_extent+0x9f4/0x1440 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:802
ext4_es_insert_extent+0x2ca/0xcb0 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:882
ext4_map_blocks+0x92a/0x16f0 fs/ext4/inode.c:680
ext4_alloc_file_blocks.isra.0+0x2df/0xb70 fs/ext4/extents.c:4462
ext4_zero_range fs/ext4/extents.c:4622 [inline]
ext4_fallocate+0x251c/0x3ce0 fs/ext4/extents.c:4721
[...]
==================================================================

The flow of issue triggering is as follows:
1. remove es
raw es es removed es1
|-------------------| -> |----|.......|------|

2. insert es
es insert es1 merge with es es1 merge with es and free es1
|----|.......|------| -> |------------|------| -> |-------------------|

es merges with newes, then merges with es1, frees es1, then determines
if es1->es_len is 0 and triggers a UAF.

The code flow is as follows:
ext4_es_insert_extent
es1 = __es_alloc_extent(true);
es2 = __es_alloc_extent(true);
__es_remove_extent(inode, lblk, end, NULL, es1)
__es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es1) ---> insert es1 to es tree
__es_insert_extent(inode, &newes, es2)
ext4_es_try_to_merge_right
ext4_es_free_extent(inode, es1) ---> es1 is freed
if (es1 && !es1->es_len)
// Trigger UAF by determining if es1 is used.

We determine whether es1 or es2 is used immediately after calling
__es_remove_extent() or __es_insert_extent() to avoid triggering a
UAF if es1 or es2 is freed.

Reported-by: Yikebaer Aizezi <yikebaer61@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CALcu4raD4h9coiyEBL4Bm0zjDwxC2CyPiTwsP3zFuhot6y9Beg@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 2a69c450083d ("ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_extent()")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230815070808.3377171-1-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.45, v6.1.44
# 2612e3bb 07-Aug-2023 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...


# 9f771739 07-Aug-2023 Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41
# 61b73694 24-Jul-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


Revision tags: v6.1.40, v6.1.39
# 50501936 17-Jul-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge tag 'v6.4' into next

Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to shared infrastructure.


# 0791faeb 17-Jul-2023 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.


# 2f98e686 11-Jul-2023 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>


Revision tags: v6.1.38, v6.1.37
# 44f10dbe 30-Jun-2023 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable


# 53ea167b 29-Jun-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Various cleanups and bug fixes in ext4's extent status tree,
journalling,

Merge tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4

Pull ext4 updates from Ted Ts'o:
"Various cleanups and bug fixes in ext4's extent status tree,
journalling, and block allocator subsystems.

Also improve performance for parallel DIO overwrites"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4: (55 commits)
ext4: avoid updating the superblock on a r/o mount if not needed
jbd2: skip reading super block if it has been verified
ext4: fix to check return value of freeze_bdev() in ext4_shutdown()
ext4: refactoring to use the unified helper ext4_quotas_off()
ext4: turn quotas off if mount failed after enabling quotas
ext4: update doc about journal superblock description
ext4: add journal cycled recording support
jbd2: continue to record log between each mount
jbd2: remove j_format_version
jbd2: factor out journal initialization from journal_get_superblock()
jbd2: switch to check format version in superblock directly
jbd2: remove unused feature macros
ext4: ext4_put_super: Remove redundant checking for 'sbi->s_journal_bdev'
ext4: Fix reusing stale buffer heads from last failed mounting
ext4: allow concurrent unaligned dio overwrites
ext4: clean up mballoc criteria comments
ext4: make ext4_zeroout_es() return void
ext4: make ext4_es_insert_extent() return void
ext4: make ext4_es_insert_delayed_block() return void
ext4: make ext4_es_remove_extent() return void
...

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.36
# e80b5003 27-Jun-2023 Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Merge branch 'for-6.5/apple' into for-linus

- improved support for Keychron K8 keyboard (Lasse Brun)


# 53ae158f 27-Jun-2023 Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Merge tag 'arm-vfp-refactor-for-rmk' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux into devel-stable

Refactor VFP support code and reimplement in C

The VFP related changes to permit k

Merge tag 'arm-vfp-refactor-for-rmk' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux into devel-stable

Refactor VFP support code and reimplement in C

The VFP related changes to permit kernel mode NEON in softirq context
resulted in some issues regarding en/disabling of sofirqs from asm code,
and this made it clear that it would be better to handle more of it from
C code.

Given that we already have infrastructure that associates undefined
instruction exceptions with handler code based on value/mask pairs, we
can easily move the dispatch of VFP and NEON instructions to C code once
we reimplement the actual VFP support routine (which reasons about how
to deal with the exception and whether any emulation is needed) in C
code first.

With those out of the way, we can drop the partial decoding logic in asm
that reasons about which ISA is being used by user space, as the
remaining cases are all 32-bit ARM only. This leaves a FPE specific
routine with some iWMMXT logic that is easily duplicated in C as well,
allowing us to move the FPE asm code into the FPE asm source file, and
out of the shared entry code.

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26
# 6c120399 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: make ext4_es_insert_extent() return void

Now ext4_es_insert_extent() never return error, so make it return void.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@su

ext4: make ext4_es_insert_extent() return void

Now ext4_es_insert_extent() never return error, so make it return void.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-12-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


# 8782b020 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: make ext4_es_insert_delayed_block() return void

Now it never fails when inserting a delay extent, so the return value in
ext4_es_insert_delayed_block is no longer necessary, let it return void

ext4: make ext4_es_insert_delayed_block() return void

Now it never fails when inserting a delay extent, so the return value in
ext4_es_insert_delayed_block is no longer necessary, let it return void.

[ Fixed bug which caused system hangs during bigalloc test runs. See
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230612030405.GH1436857@mit.edu for more
details. -- TYT ]

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-11-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


# ed5d285b 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: make ext4_es_remove_extent() return void

Now ext4_es_remove_extent() never fails, so make it return void.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

ext4: make ext4_es_remove_extent() return void

Now ext4_es_remove_extent() never fails, so make it return void.

Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-10-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


# 2a69c450 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_extent()

Similar to in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(), we use preallocations that
do not fail to avoid inconsistencies, but we do not care about es

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_extent()

Similar to in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(), we use preallocations that
do not fail to avoid inconsistencies, but we do not care about es that are
not must be kept, and we return 0 even if such es memory allocation fails.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-9-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


# 4a2d9844 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block()

Similar to in ext4_es_remove_extent(), we use a no-fail preallocation
to avoid inconsistencies, except that here we may have to pre

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_insert_delayed_block()

Similar to in ext4_es_remove_extent(), we use a no-fail preallocation
to avoid inconsistencies, except that here we may have to preallocate
two extent_status.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-8-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


# e9fe2b88 23-Apr-2023 Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_remove_extent()

If __es_remove_extent() returns an error it means that when splitting
extent, allocating an extent that must be kept failed, where returni

ext4: using nofail preallocation in ext4_es_remove_extent()

If __es_remove_extent() returns an error it means that when splitting
extent, allocating an extent that must be kept failed, where returning
an error directly would cause the extent tree to be inconsistent. So we
use GFP_NOFAIL to pre-allocate an extent_status and pass it to
__es_remove_extent() to avoid this problem.

In addition, since the allocated memory is outside the i_es_lock, the
extent_status tree may change and the pre-allocated extent_status is
no longer needed, so we release the pre-allocated extent_status when
es->es_len is not initialized.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230424033846.4732-7-libaokun1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>

show more ...


12345678910>>...24