History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/space-info.c (Results 1 – 25 of 548)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.67, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.6.64, v6.6.63, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57, v6.6.56, v6.6.55, v6.6.54, v6.6.53, v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49, v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46
# 0db00e5d 11-Aug-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.45' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.45 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.45, v6.6.44, v6.6.43, v6.6.42, v6.6.41, v6.6.40
# 0caf15be 11-Jul-2024 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: do not subtract delalloc from avail bytes

commit d89c285d28491d8f10534c262ac9e6bdcbe1b4d2 upstream.

The block group's avail bytes printed when dumping a space info subtract
the delalloc_byte

btrfs: do not subtract delalloc from avail bytes

commit d89c285d28491d8f10534c262ac9e6bdcbe1b4d2 upstream.

The block group's avail bytes printed when dumping a space info subtract
the delalloc_bytes. However, as shown in btrfs_add_reserved_bytes() and
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(), it is added or subtracted along with
"reserved" for the delalloc case, which means the "delalloc_bytes" is a
part of the "reserved" bytes. So, excluding it to calculate the avail space
counts delalloc_bytes twice, which can lead to an invalid result.

Fixes: e50b122b832b ("btrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29, v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2
# ae29e6f7 14-Feb-2023 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block group read-write again

commit 8cd44dd1d17a23d5cc8c443c659ca57aa76e2fa5 upstream.

When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all fre

btrfs: zoned: fix zone_unusable accounting on making block group read-write again

commit 8cd44dd1d17a23d5cc8c443c659ca57aa76e2fa5 upstream.

When btrfs makes a block group read-only, it adds all free regions in the
block group to space_info->bytes_readonly. That free space excludes
reserved and pinned regions. OTOH, when btrfs makes the block group
read-write again, it moves all the unused regions into the block group's
zone_unusable. That unused region includes reserved and pinned regions.
As a result, it counts too much zone_unusable bytes.

Fortunately (or unfortunately), having erroneous zone_unusable does not
affect the calculation of space_info->bytes_readonly, because free
space (num_bytes in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro) calculation is done based on
the erroneous zone_unusable and it reduces the num_bytes just to cancel the
error.

This behavior can be easily discovered by adding a WARN_ON to check e.g,
"bg->pinned > 0" in btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(), and running fstests test
case like btrfs/282.

Fix it by properly considering pinned and reserved in
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(). Also, add a WARN_ON and introduce
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_zone_unusable() to catch a similar mistake.

Fixes: 169e0da91a21 ("btrfs: zoned: track unusable bytes for zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# 5ee9cd06 27-Mar-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.23' into dev-6.6

Linux 6.6.23


# 82220b18 19-Feb-2024 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: fix data races when accessing the reserved amount of block reserves

[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ]

At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->

btrfs: fix data races when accessing the reserved amount of block reserves

[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ]

At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved
field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock
first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is
always updated while holding the spinlock.

The reports from KCSAN are like the following:

[117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs]

[117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3:
[117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs]
[117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs]
[117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs]
[117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs]
[117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs]
[117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs]
[117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs]
[117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0
[117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728
[117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs]
[117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498
[117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150
[117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88
[117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210
[117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0
[117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98

[117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0:
[117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs]
[117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs]
[117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
[117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
[117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30

So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while
holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by
need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but
that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done
sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead
of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load
tearing.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# c900529f 12-Sep-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Forwarding to v6.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


# 1ac731c5 30-Aug-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.


# 547635c6 28-Aug-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"No new features, the bulk of the changes are fixes, refactoring and
cle

Merge tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"No new features, the bulk of the changes are fixes, refactoring and
cleanups. The notable fix is the scrub performance restoration after
rewrite in 6.4, though still only partial.

Fixes:

- scrub performance drop due to rewrite in 6.4 partially restored:
- do IO grouping by blg_plug/blk_unplug again
- avoid unnecessary tree searches when processing stripes, in
extent and checksum trees
- the drop is noticeable on fast PCIe devices, -66% and restored
to -33% of the original
- backports to 6.4 planned

- handle more corner cases of transaction commit during orphan
cleanup or delayed ref processing

- use correct fsid/metadata_uuid when validating super block

- copy directory permissions and time when creating a stub subvolume

Core:

- debugging feature integrity checker deprecated, to be removed in
6.7

- in zoned mode, zones are activated just before the write, making
error handling easier, now the overcommit mechanism can be enabled
again which improves performance by avoiding more frequent flushing

- v0 extent handling completely removed, deprecated long time ago

- error handling improvements

- tests:
- extent buffer bitmap tests
- pinned extent splitting tests

- cleanups and refactoring:
- compression writeback
- extent buffer bitmap
- space flushing, ENOSPC handling"

* tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (110 commits)
btrfs: zoned: skip splitting and logical rewriting on pre-alloc write
btrfs: tests: test invalid splitting when skipping pinned drop extent_map
btrfs: tests: add a test for btrfs_add_extent_mapping
btrfs: tests: add extent_map tests for dropping with odd layouts
btrfs: scrub: move write back of repaired sectors to scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker()
btrfs: scrub: don't go ordered workqueue for dev-replace
btrfs: scrub: fix grouping of read IO
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary csum tree search preparing stripes
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary extent tree search preparing stripes
btrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume
btrfs: remove pointless empty list check when reading delayed dir indexes
btrfs: drop redundant check to use fs_devices::metadata_uuid
btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super
btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super
btrfs: simplify memcpy either of metadata_uuid or fsid
btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid
btrfs: remove v0 extent handling
btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref
btrfs: move the !zoned assert into run_delalloc_cow
btrfs: consolidate the error handling in run_delalloc_nocow
...

show more ...


# 5b135b38 07-Aug-2023 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: zoned: re-enable metadata over-commit for zoned mode

Now that, we can re-enable metadata over-commit. As we moved the activation
from the reservation time to the write time, we no longer need

btrfs: zoned: re-enable metadata over-commit for zoned mode

Now that, we can re-enable metadata over-commit. As we moved the activation
from the reservation time to the write time, we no longer need to ensure
all the reserved bytes is properly activated.

Without the metadata over-commit, it suffers from lower performance because
it needs to flush the delalloc items more often and allocate more block
groups. Re-enabling metadata over-commit will solve the issue.

Fixes: 79417d040f4f ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 5a7d107e 07-Aug-2023 Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>

btrfs: zoned: don't activate non-DATA BG on allocation

Now that a non-DATA block group is activated at write time, don't
activate it on allocation time.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.th

btrfs: zoned: don't activate non-DATA BG on allocation

Now that a non-DATA block group is activated at write time, don't
activate it on allocation time.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 2ee70ed1 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: avoid starting and committing empty transaction when flushing space

When flushing space and we are in the COMMIT_TRANS state, we join a
transaction with btrfs_join_transaction() and then comm

btrfs: avoid starting and committing empty transaction when flushing space

When flushing space and we are in the COMMIT_TRANS state, we join a
transaction with btrfs_join_transaction() and then commit the returned
transaction. However btrfs_join_transaction() starts a new transaction if
there is none currently open, which is pointless since comitting a new,
empty transaction, doesn't achieve anything, it only wastes time, IO and
creates an unnecessary rotation of the backup roots.

So use btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() to avoid starting a new
transaction. This also waits for any ongoing transaction that is
committing (state >= TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING) to fully complete, and
therefore wait for all the extents that were pinned during the
transaction's lifetime to be unpinned.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 2391245a 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: avoid starting new transaction when flushing delayed items and refs

When flushing space we join a transaction to flush delayed items and
delayed references, in order to try to release space.

btrfs: avoid starting new transaction when flushing delayed items and refs

When flushing space we join a transaction to flush delayed items and
delayed references, in order to try to release space. However using
btrfs_join_transaction() not only joins an existing transaction as well
as it starts a new transaction if there is none open. If there is no
transaction open, we don't have neither delayed items nor delayed
references, so creating a new transaction is a waste of time, IO and
creates an unnecessary rotation of the backup roots without gaining any
benefits (including releasing space).

So use btrfs_join_transaction_nostart() when attempting to flush delayed
items and references.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 7e3bfd14 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: fail priority metadata ticket with real fs error

At priority_reclaim_metadata_space(), if we were not able to satisfy the
the ticket after going through the various flushing states and we not

btrfs: fail priority metadata ticket with real fs error

At priority_reclaim_metadata_space(), if we were not able to satisfy the
the ticket after going through the various flushing states and we notice
the fs went into an error state, likely due to a transaction abort during
the flushing, set the ticket's error to the error that caused the
transaction abort instead of an unconditional -EROFS.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 1b6948ac 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: don't steal space from global rsv after a transaction abort

When doing a priority metadata space reclaim, while we are going through
the flush states and running their respective operations,

btrfs: don't steal space from global rsv after a transaction abort

When doing a priority metadata space reclaim, while we are going through
the flush states and running their respective operations, it's possible
that a transaction abort happened, for example when running delayed refs
we hit -ENOSPC or in the critical section of transaction commit we failed
with -ENOSPC or some other error. In these cases a transaction was aborted
and the fs turned into error state. If that happened, then it makes no
sense to steal from the global block reserve and return success to the
caller if the stealing was successful - the caller will later get an
error when attempting to modify the fs. Instead make the ticket fail if
we have the fs in error state and don't attempt to steal from the global
rsv, as it's not only it's pointless, it also simplifies debugging some
-ENOSPC problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 1ff9fee3 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: print available space across all block groups when dumping space info

When dumping a space info also sum the available space for all block
groups and then print it. This often useful for debu

btrfs: print available space across all block groups when dumping space info

When dumping a space info also sum the available space for all block
groups and then print it. This often useful for debugging -ENOSPC
related problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# e50b122b 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info

When dumping a space info, we iterate over all its block groups and then
print their size and the amounts of bytes used, rese

btrfs: print available space for a block group when dumping a space info

When dumping a space info, we iterate over all its block groups and then
print their size and the amounts of bytes used, reserved, pinned, etc.
When debugging -ENOSPC problems it's also useful to know how much space
is available (free), so calculate that and print it as well.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# b92e8f54 26-Jul-2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: print block group super and delalloc bytes when dumping space info

When dumping a space info's block groups, also print the number of bytes
used for super blocks and delalloc. This is often u

btrfs: print block group super and delalloc bytes when dumping space info

When dumping a space info's block groups, also print the number of bytes
used for super blocks and delalloc. This is often useful for debugging
-ENOSPC problems.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


# 50501936 17-Jul-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge tag 'v6.4' into next

Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to shared infrastructure.


# db6da59c 15-Jun-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next-fixes

Backmerging to sync drm-misc-next-fixes with drm-misc-next.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


# 03c60192 12-Jun-2023 Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base

Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via
drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patche

Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base

Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via
drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patches depend on these helpers.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

show more ...


# 5c680050 06-Jun-2023 Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Merge tag 'v6.4-rc4' into wpan-next/staging

Linux 6.4-rc4


# 9ff17e6b 05-Jun-2023 Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:

c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:

c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

show more ...


# 9c3a985f 17-May-2023 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Backmerge to get some hwmon dependencies.

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>


# 50282fd5 12-May-2023 Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Let's bring 6.4-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to start the new fix cycle.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>


# ff32fcca 09-May-2023 Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Start the 6.5 release cycle.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>


12345678910>>...22