History log of /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/send.c (Results 1 – 25 of 1781)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.67, v6.6.66, v6.6.65, v6.6.64, v6.6.63, v6.6.62, v6.6.61, v6.6.60, v6.6.59, v6.6.58, v6.6.57
# fac59652 10-Oct-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.56' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.56 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.56, v6.6.55, v6.6.54, v6.6.53
# 521cfe23 27-Sep-2024 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: send: fix invalid clone operation for file that got its size decreased

commit fa630df665aa9ddce3a96ce7b54e10a38e4d2a2b upstream.

During an incremental send we may end up sending an invalid c

btrfs: send: fix invalid clone operation for file that got its size decreased

commit fa630df665aa9ddce3a96ce7b54e10a38e4d2a2b upstream.

During an incremental send we may end up sending an invalid clone
operation, for the last extent of a file which ends at an unaligned offset
that matches the final i_size of the file in the send snapshot, in case
the file had its initial size (the size in the parent snapshot) decreased
in the send snapshot. In this case the destination will fail to apply the
clone operation because its end offset is not sector size aligned and it
ends before the current size of the file.

Sending the truncate operation always happens when we finish processing an
inode, after we process all its extents (and xattrs, names, etc). So fix
this by ensuring the file has a valid size before we send a clone
operation for an unaligned extent that ends at the final i_size of the
file. The size we truncate to matches the start offset of the clone range
but it could be any value between that start offset and the final size of
the file since the clone operation will expand the i_size if the current
size is smaller than the end offset. The start offset of the range was
chosen because it's always sector size aligned and avoids a truncation
into the middle of a page, which results in dirtying the page due to
filling part of it with zeroes and then making the clone operation at the
receiver trigger IO.

The following test reproduces the issue:

$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash

DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi

mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

# Create a file with a size of 256K + 5 bytes, having two extents, one
# with a size of 128K and another one with a size of 128K + 5 bytes.
last_ext_size=$((128 * 1024 + 5))
xfs_io -f -d -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 128K 0 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcd -b $last_ext_size 128K $last_ext_size" \
$MNT/foo

# Another file which we will later clone foo into, but initially with
# a larger size than foo.
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xef 0 1M" $MNT/bar

btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/ $MNT/snap1

# Now resize bar and clone foo into it.
xfs_io -c "truncate 0" \
-c "reflink $MNT/foo" $MNT/bar

btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/ $MNT/snap2

rm -f /tmp/send-full /tmp/send-inc
btrfs send -f /tmp/send-full $MNT/snap1
btrfs send -p $MNT/snap1 -f /tmp/send-inc $MNT/snap2

umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

btrfs receive -f /tmp/send-full $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/send-inc $MNT

umount $MNT

Running it before this patch:

$ ./test.sh
(...)
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar: Invalid argument

A test case for fstests will be sent soon.

Reported-by: Ben Millwood <thebenmachine@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAJhrHS2z+WViO2h=ojYvBPDLsATwLbg+7JaNCyYomv0fUxEpQQ@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 46a6e10a1ab1 ("btrfs: send: allow cloning non-aligned extent if it ends at i_size")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.11
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.52, v6.6.51, v6.6.50, v6.6.49
# 26d0dfbb 29-Aug-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.48' into for/openbmc/dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.48 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.48, v6.6.47, v6.6.46
# f0e86587 12-Aug-2024 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: send: allow cloning non-aligned extent if it ends at i_size

[ Upstream commit 46a6e10a1ab16cc71d4a3cab73e79aabadd6b8ea ]

If we a find that an extent is shared but its end offset is not secto

btrfs: send: allow cloning non-aligned extent if it ends at i_size

[ Upstream commit 46a6e10a1ab16cc71d4a3cab73e79aabadd6b8ea ]

If we a find that an extent is shared but its end offset is not sector
size aligned, then we don't clone it and issue write operations instead.
This is because the reflink (remap_file_range) operation does not allow
to clone unaligned ranges, except if the end offset of the range matches
the i_size of the source and destination files (and the start offset is
sector size aligned).

While this is not incorrect because send can only guarantee that a file
has the same data in the source and destination snapshots, it's not
optimal and generates confusion and surprising behaviour for users.

For example, running this test:

$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash

DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi

mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

# Use a file size not aligned to any possible sector size.
file_size=$((1 * 1024 * 1024 + 5)) # 1MB + 5 bytes
dd if=/dev/random of=$MNT/foo bs=$file_size count=1
cp --reflink=always $MNT/foo $MNT/bar

btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT/ $MNT/snap
rm -f /tmp/send-test
btrfs send -f /tmp/send-test $MNT/snap

umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

btrfs receive -vv -f /tmp/send-test $MNT

xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/snap/bar

umount $MNT

Gives the following result:

(...)
mkfile o258-7-0
rename o258-7-0 -> bar
write bar - offset=0 length=49152
write bar - offset=49152 length=49152
write bar - offset=98304 length=49152
write bar - offset=147456 length=49152
write bar - offset=196608 length=49152
write bar - offset=245760 length=49152
write bar - offset=294912 length=49152
write bar - offset=344064 length=49152
write bar - offset=393216 length=49152
write bar - offset=442368 length=49152
write bar - offset=491520 length=49152
write bar - offset=540672 length=49152
write bar - offset=589824 length=49152
write bar - offset=638976 length=49152
write bar - offset=688128 length=49152
write bar - offset=737280 length=49152
write bar - offset=786432 length=49152
write bar - offset=835584 length=49152
write bar - offset=884736 length=49152
write bar - offset=933888 length=49152
write bar - offset=983040 length=49152
write bar - offset=1032192 length=16389
chown bar - uid=0, gid=0
chmod bar - mode=0644
utimes bar
utimes
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=06d640da-9ca1-604c-b87c-3375175a8eb3, stransid=7
/mnt/sdi/snap/bar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..2055]: 26624..28679 2056 0x1

There's no clone operation to clone extents from the file foo into file
bar and fiemap confirms there's no shared flag (0x2000).

So update send_write_or_clone() so that it proceeds with cloning if the
source and destination ranges end at the i_size of the respective files.

After this changes the result of the test is:

(...)
mkfile o258-7-0
rename o258-7-0 -> bar
clone bar - source=foo source offset=0 offset=0 length=1048581
chown bar - uid=0, gid=0
chmod bar - mode=0644
utimes bar
utimes
BTRFS_IOC_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL uuid=582420f3-ea7d-564e-bbe5-ce440d622190, stransid=7
/mnt/sdi/snap/bar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..2055]: 26624..28679 2056 0x2001

A test case for fstests will also follow up soon.

Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/572#issuecomment-2282841416
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.45, v6.6.44, v6.6.43, v6.6.42, v6.6.41, v6.6.40, v6.6.39, v6.6.38, v6.6.37, v6.6.36, v6.6.35, v6.6.34, v6.6.33, v6.6.32, v6.6.31, v6.6.30, v6.6.29, v6.6.28, v6.6.27, v6.6.26, v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13
# 1bca9776 16-Jan-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: replace sb::s_blocksize by fs_info::sectorsize

[ Upstream commit 4e00422ee62663e31e611d7de4d2c4aa3f8555f2 ]

The block size stored in the super block is used by subsystems outside
of btrfs an

btrfs: replace sb::s_blocksize by fs_info::sectorsize

[ Upstream commit 4e00422ee62663e31e611d7de4d2c4aa3f8555f2 ]

The block size stored in the super block is used by subsystems outside
of btrfs and it's a copy of fs_info::sectorsize. Unify that to always
use our sectorsize, with the exception of mount where we first need to
use fixed values (4K) until we read the super block and can set the
sectorsize.

Replace all uses, in most cases it's fewer pointer indirections.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 46a6e10a1ab1 ("btrfs: send: allow cloning non-aligned extent if it ends at i_size")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# c7e0e8ac 06-Feb-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: change BUG_ON to assertion in tree_move_down()

[ Upstream commit 56f335e043ae73c32dbb70ba95488845dc0f1e6e ]

There's only one caller of tree_move_down() that does not pass level 0
so the asse

btrfs: change BUG_ON to assertion in tree_move_down()

[ Upstream commit 56f335e043ae73c32dbb70ba95488845dc0f1e6e ]

There's only one caller of tree_move_down() that does not pass level 0
so the assertion is better suited here.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 48256173 06-Feb-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: send: handle unexpected inode in header process_recorded_refs()

[ Upstream commit 5d2288711ccc483feca73151c46ee835bda17839 ]

Change BUG_ON to proper error handling when an unexpected inode n

btrfs: send: handle unexpected inode in header process_recorded_refs()

[ Upstream commit 5d2288711ccc483feca73151c46ee835bda17839 ]

Change BUG_ON to proper error handling when an unexpected inode number
is encountered. As the comment says this should never happen.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 4eb8be94 06-Feb-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: send: handle unexpected data in header buffer in begin_cmd()

[ Upstream commit e80e3f732cf53c64b0d811e1581470d67f6c3228 ]

Change BUG_ON to a proper error handling in the unlikely case of see

btrfs: send: handle unexpected data in header buffer in begin_cmd()

[ Upstream commit e80e3f732cf53c64b0d811e1581470d67f6c3228 ]

Change BUG_ON to a proper error handling in the unlikely case of seeing
data when the command is started. This is supposed to be reset when the
command is finished (send_cmd, send_encoded_extent).

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# e0d77d0f 19-May-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.31' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.31 stable release


Revision tags: v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9
# 0b76a4f7 21-Dec-2023 Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>

btrfs: fix kvcalloc() arguments order in btrfs_ioctl_send()

commit 6ff09b6b8c2fb6b3edda4ffaa173153a40653067 upstream.

When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231220 (experimental)
and W=1, I've no

btrfs: fix kvcalloc() arguments order in btrfs_ioctl_send()

commit 6ff09b6b8c2fb6b3edda4ffaa173153a40653067 upstream.

When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231220 (experimental)
and W=1, I've noticed the following warning:

fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_send':
fs/btrfs/send.c:8208:44: warning: 'kvcalloc' sizes specified with 'sizeof'
in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Wcalloc-transposed-args]
8208 | sctx->clone_roots = kvcalloc(sizeof(*sctx->clone_roots),
| ^

Since 'n' and 'size' arguments of 'kvcalloc()' are multiplied to
calculate the final size, their actual order doesn't affect the result
and so this is not a bug. But it's still worth to fix it.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# 1e952e95 14-Apr-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.27' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.27 stable release


# c1363ed8 06-Feb-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()

[ Upstream commit 3c6ee34c6f9cd12802326da26631232a61743501 ]

Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer

btrfs: send: handle path ref underflow in header iterate_inode_ref()

[ Upstream commit 3c6ee34c6f9cd12802326da26631232a61743501 ]

Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer
fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel
addresses.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 816ffd28 13-Mar-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.21' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.21 stable release


# c595db6d 13-Mar-2024 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.18' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.18 stable release


# 202e4f4b 16-Feb-2024 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

btrfs: send: don't issue unnecessary zero writes for trailing hole

commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream.

If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's en

btrfs: send: don't issue unnecessary zero writes for trailing hole

commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream.

If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end
to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the
file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write
full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent
ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up
with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space
at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of
having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even
gigabytes of unnecessary space.

Example, reproducer:

$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash

DEV=/dev/sdh
MNT=/mnt/sdh

mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

# Create 1G sparse file.
xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar

# Create base snapshot.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1

# Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot.
btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1

# Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere
# in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent
# and the file's size.
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \
$MNT/foobar

# Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an
# incremental send operation.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2

# Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot.
btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2

# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and
# verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had
# and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each.
umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT

btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT

echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:"
# Should have:
#
# 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[
# hole at file range [128K, 512M[
# 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[
# hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[
xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar

# File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents).
echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)"

umount $MNT

Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the
range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for
the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the
range [512M + 128K, 1G[):

$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576 0x1

Space used by the file: 513M

This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at
finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full
of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent
and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent
snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already
a hole.

After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout:

$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135 256 0x1
3: [1048832..2097151]: hole 1048320

Space used by the file: 256K

A test case for fstests will follow soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


# 7efadbcb 10-Jan-2024 David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs: send: return EOPNOTSUPP on unknown flags

commit f884a9f9e59206a2d41f265e7e403f080d10b493 upstream.

When some ioctl flags are checked we return EOPNOTSUPP, like for
BTRFS_SCRUB_SUPPORTED_FLAG

btrfs: send: return EOPNOTSUPP on unknown flags

commit f884a9f9e59206a2d41f265e7e403f080d10b493 upstream.

When some ioctl flags are checked we return EOPNOTSUPP, like for
BTRFS_SCRUB_SUPPORTED_FLAGS, BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ARGS_MASK or fallocate
modes. The EINVAL is supposed to be for a supported but invalid
values or combination of options. Fix that when checking send flags so
it's consistent with the rest.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H5rryOLzp3EKq8RTbjMHMHeaJubfpsVLF6H4qJnKCUR1w@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.8
# b97d6790 13-Dec-2023 Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>

Merge tag 'v6.6.6' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.6 stable release

Signed-off-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>


Revision tags: v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3
# da2dbbb7 24-Nov-2023 Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>

btrfs: send: ensure send_fd is writable

commit 0ac1d13a55eb37d398b63e6ff6db4a09a2c9128c upstream.

kernel_write() requires the caller to ensure that the file is writable.
Let's do that directly afte

btrfs: send: ensure send_fd is writable

commit 0ac1d13a55eb37d398b63e6ff6db4a09a2c9128c upstream.

kernel_write() requires the caller to ensure that the file is writable.
Let's do that directly after looking up the ->send_fd.

We don't need a separate bailout path because the "out" path already
does fput() if ->send_filp is non-NULL.

This has no security impact for two reasons:

- the ioctl requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN
- __kernel_write() bails out on read-only files - but only since 5.8,
see commit a01ac27be472 ("fs: check FMODE_WRITE in __kernel_write")

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+12e098239d20385264d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=12e098239d20385264d3
Fixes: 31db9f7c23fb ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3
# c900529f 12-Sep-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Forwarding to v6.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


Revision tags: v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1
# 1ac731c5 30-Aug-2023 Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.


Revision tags: v6.1.50
# 547635c6 28-Aug-2023 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Merge tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"No new features, the bulk of the changes are fixes, refactoring and
cle

Merge tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba:
"No new features, the bulk of the changes are fixes, refactoring and
cleanups. The notable fix is the scrub performance restoration after
rewrite in 6.4, though still only partial.

Fixes:

- scrub performance drop due to rewrite in 6.4 partially restored:
- do IO grouping by blg_plug/blk_unplug again
- avoid unnecessary tree searches when processing stripes, in
extent and checksum trees
- the drop is noticeable on fast PCIe devices, -66% and restored
to -33% of the original
- backports to 6.4 planned

- handle more corner cases of transaction commit during orphan
cleanup or delayed ref processing

- use correct fsid/metadata_uuid when validating super block

- copy directory permissions and time when creating a stub subvolume

Core:

- debugging feature integrity checker deprecated, to be removed in
6.7

- in zoned mode, zones are activated just before the write, making
error handling easier, now the overcommit mechanism can be enabled
again which improves performance by avoiding more frequent flushing

- v0 extent handling completely removed, deprecated long time ago

- error handling improvements

- tests:
- extent buffer bitmap tests
- pinned extent splitting tests

- cleanups and refactoring:
- compression writeback
- extent buffer bitmap
- space flushing, ENOSPC handling"

* tag 'for-6.6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (110 commits)
btrfs: zoned: skip splitting and logical rewriting on pre-alloc write
btrfs: tests: test invalid splitting when skipping pinned drop extent_map
btrfs: tests: add a test for btrfs_add_extent_mapping
btrfs: tests: add extent_map tests for dropping with odd layouts
btrfs: scrub: move write back of repaired sectors to scrub_stripe_read_repair_worker()
btrfs: scrub: don't go ordered workqueue for dev-replace
btrfs: scrub: fix grouping of read IO
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary csum tree search preparing stripes
btrfs: scrub: avoid unnecessary extent tree search preparing stripes
btrfs: copy dir permission and time when creating a stub subvolume
btrfs: remove pointless empty list check when reading delayed dir indexes
btrfs: drop redundant check to use fs_devices::metadata_uuid
btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super
btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super
btrfs: simplify memcpy either of metadata_uuid or fsid
btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid
btrfs: remove v0 extent handling
btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref
btrfs: move the !zoned assert into run_delalloc_cow
btrfs: consolidate the error handling in run_delalloc_nocow
...

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45
# 84af994b 09-Aug-2023 Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>

btrfs: use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head

Use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head instead of open-coding it.

Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterb

btrfs: use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head

Use LIST_HEAD() to initialize the list_head instead of open-coding it.

Signed-off-by: Ruan Jinjie <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.44
# 2612e3bb 07-Aug-2023 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...


# 9f771739 07-Aug-2023 Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41
# 61b73694 24-Jul-2023 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>


12345678910>>...72