Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable

Merge tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov:

- Add support for unaccepted memory as specified i

Merge tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov:

- Add support for unaccepted memory as specified in the UEFI spec v2.9.

The gist of it all is that Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP confidential
computing guests define the notion of accepting memory before using
it and thus preventing a whole set of attacks against such guests
like memory replay and the like.

There are a couple of strategies of how memory should be accepted -
the current implementation does an on-demand way of accepting.

* tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
virt: sevguest: Add CONFIG_CRYPTO dependency
x86/efi: Safely enable unaccepted memory in UEFI
x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable
x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests
x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages
x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one()
x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub
efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory
efi: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory
efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820()
mm: Add support for unaccepted memory

show more ...

efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory

UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces the concept of memory
acceptance: Some Virtual Machine platforms, such as Intel TDX or AMD
SEV-SNP, req

efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory

UEFI Specification version 2.9 introduces the concept of memory
acceptance: Some Virtual Machine platforms, such as Intel TDX or AMD
SEV-SNP, requiring memory to be accepted before it can be used by the
guest. Accepting happens via a protocol specific for the Virtual
Machine platform.

Accepting memory is costly and it makes VMM allocate memory for the
accepted guest physical address range. It's better to postpone memory
acceptance until memory is needed. It lowers boot time and reduces
memory overhead.

The kernel needs to know what memory has been accepted. Firmware
communicates this information via memory map: a new memory type --
EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY -- indicates such memory.

Range-based tracking works fine for firmware, but it gets bulky for
the kernel: e820 (or whatever the arch uses) has to be modified on every
page acceptance. It leads to table fragmentation and there's a limited
number of entries in the e820 table.

Another option is to mark such memory as usable in e820 and track if the
range has been accepted in a bitmap. One bit in the bitmap represents a
naturally aligned power-2-sized region of address space -- unit.

For x86, unit size is 2MiB: 4k of the bitmap is enough to track 64GiB or
physical address space.

In the worst-case scenario -- a huge hole in the middle of the
address space -- It needs 256MiB to handle 4PiB of the address
space.

Any unaccepted memory that is not aligned to unit_size gets accepted
upfront.

The bitmap is allocated and constructed in the EFI stub and passed down
to the kernel via EFI configuration table. allocate_e820() allocates the
bitmap if unaccepted memory is present, according to the size of
unaccepted region.

Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606142637.5171-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com

show more ...