Merge tag 'v6.6.26' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.26 stable release

x86/sev: Move early startup code into .head.text section

commit 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 upstream.

In preparation for implementing rigorous build time checks to enforce
that only co

x86/sev: Move early startup code into .head.text section

commit 428080c9b19bfda37c478cd626dbd3851db1aff9 upstream.

In preparation for implementing rigorous build time checks to enforce
that only code that can support it will be called from the early 1:1
mapping of memory, move SEV init code that is called in this manner to
the .head.text section.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227151907.387873-19-ardb+git@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

Merge tag 'v6.6.24' into dev-6.6

This is the 6.6.24 stable release

x86/sev: Skip ROM range scans and validation for SEV-SNP guests

commit 0f4a1e80989aca185d955fcd791d7750082044a2 upstream.

SEV-SNP requires encrypted memory to be validated before access.
Because th

x86/sev: Skip ROM range scans and validation for SEV-SNP guests

commit 0f4a1e80989aca185d955fcd791d7750082044a2 upstream.

SEV-SNP requires encrypted memory to be validated before access.
Because the ROM memory range is not part of the e820 table, it is not
pre-validated by the BIOS. Therefore, if a SEV-SNP guest kernel wishes
to access this range, the guest must first validate the range.

The current SEV-SNP code does indeed scan the ROM range during early
boot and thus attempts to validate the ROM range in probe_roms().
However, this behavior is neither sufficient nor necessary for the
following reasons:

* With regards to sufficiency, if EFI_CONFIG_TABLES are not enabled and
CONFIG_DMI_SCAN_MACHINE_NON_EFI_FALLBACK is set, the kernel will
attempt to access the memory at SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START (which
falls in the ROM range) prior to validation.

For example, Project Oak Stage 0 provides a minimal guest firmware
that currently meets these configuration conditions, meaning guests
booting atop Oak Stage 0 firmware encounter a problematic call chain
during dmi_setup() -> dmi_scan_machine() that results in a crash
during boot if SEV-SNP is enabled.

* With regards to necessity, SEV-SNP guests generally read garbage
(which changes across boots) from the ROM range, meaning these scans
are unnecessary. The guest reads garbage because the legacy ROM range
is unencrypted data but is accessed via an encrypted PMD during early
boot (where the PMD is marked as encrypted due to potentially mapping
actually-encrypted data in other PMD-contained ranges).

In one exceptional case, EISA probing treats the ROM range as
unencrypted data, which is inconsistent with other probing.

Continuing to allow SEV-SNP guests to use garbage and to inconsistently
classify ROM range encryption status can trigger undesirable behavior.
For instance, if garbage bytes appear to be a valid signature, memory
may be unnecessarily reserved for the ROM range. Future code or other
use cases may result in more problematic (arbitrary) behavior that
should be avoided.

While one solution would be to overhaul the early PMD mapping to always
treat the ROM region of the PMD as unencrypted, SEV-SNP guests do not
currently rely on data from the ROM region during early boot (and even
if they did, they would be mostly relying on garbage data anyways).

As a simpler solution, skip the ROM range scans (and the otherwise-
necessary range validation) during SEV-SNP guest early boot. The
potential SEV-SNP guest crash due to lack of ROM range validation is
thus avoided by simply not accessing the ROM range.

In most cases, skip the scans by overriding problematic x86_init
functions during sme_early_init() to SNP-safe variants, which can be
likened to x86_init overrides done for other platforms (ex: Xen); such
overrides also avoid the spread of cc_platform_has() checks throughout
the tree.

In the exceptional EISA case, still use cc_platform_has() for the
simplest change, given (1) checks for guest type (ex: Xen domain status)
are already performed here, and (2) these checks occur in a subsys
initcall instead of an x86_init function.

[ bp: Massage commit message, remove "we"s. ]

Fixes: 9704c07bf9f7 ("x86/kernel: Validate ROM memory before accessing when SEV-SNP is active")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313121546.2964854-1-kevinloughlin@google.com
Signed-off-by: Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-fixes into drm-misc-fixes

Forwarding to v6.6-rc1.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge branch 'next' into for-linus

Prepare input updates for 6.6 merge window.

Merge tag 'x86_boot_for_v6.6_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 boot updates from Borislav Petkov:
"Avoid the baremetal decompressor code when booting on an EFI

Merge tag 'x86_boot_for_v6.6_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 boot updates from Borislav Petkov:
"Avoid the baremetal decompressor code when booting on an EFI machine.

This is mandated by the current tightening of EFI executables
requirements when used in a secure boot scenario. More specifically,
an EFI executable cannot have a single section with RWX permissions,
which conflicts with the in-place kernel decompression that is done
today.

Instead, the things required by the booting kernel image are done in
the EFI stub now.

Work by Ard Biesheuvel"

* tag 'x86_boot_for_v6.6_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (23 commits)
x86/efistub: Avoid legacy decompressor when doing EFI boot
x86/efistub: Perform SNP feature test while running in the firmware
efi/libstub: Add limit argument to efi_random_alloc()
x86/decompressor: Factor out kernel decompression and relocation
x86/decompressor: Move global symbol references to C code
decompress: Use 8 byte alignment
x86/efistub: Prefer EFI memory attributes protocol over DXE services
x86/efistub: Perform 4/5 level paging switch from the stub
x86/decompressor: Merge trampoline cleanup with switching code
x86/decompressor: Pass pgtable address to trampoline directly
x86/decompressor: Only call the trampoline when changing paging levels
x86/decompressor: Call trampoline directly from C code
x86/decompressor: Avoid the need for a stack in the 32-bit trampoline
x86/decompressor: Use standard calling convention for trampoline
x86/decompressor: Call trampoline as a normal function
x86/decompressor: Assign paging related global variables earlier
x86/decompressor: Store boot_params pointer in callee save register
x86/efistub: Clear BSS in EFI handover protocol entrypoint
x86/decompressor: Avoid magic offsets for EFI handover entrypoint
x86/efistub: Simplify and clean up handover entry code
...

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo V

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next

Catching-up with drm-next and drm-intel-gt-next.
It will unblock a code refactor around the platform
definitions (names vs acronyms).

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>

show more ...

x86/efistub: Avoid legacy decompressor when doing EFI boot

The bare metal decompressor code was never really intended to run in a
hosted environment such as the EFI boot services, and does a few thi

x86/efistub: Avoid legacy decompressor when doing EFI boot

The bare metal decompressor code was never really intended to run in a
hosted environment such as the EFI boot services, and does a few things
that are becoming problematic in the context of EFI boot now that the
logo requirements are getting tighter: EFI executables will no longer be
allowed to consist of a single executable section that is mapped with
read, write and execute permissions if they are intended for use in a
context where Secure Boot is enabled (and where Microsoft's set of
certificates is used, i.e., every x86 PC built to run Windows).

To avoid stepping on reserved memory before having inspected the E820
tables, and to ensure the correct placement when running a kernel build
that is non-relocatable, the bare metal decompressor moves its own
executable image to the end of the allocation that was reserved for it,
in order to perform the decompression in place. This means the region in
question requires both write and execute permissions, which either need
to be given upfront (which EFI will no longer permit), or need to be
applied on demand using the existing page fault handling framework.

However, the physical placement of the kernel is usually randomized
anyway, and even if it isn't, a dedicated decompression output buffer
can be allocated anywhere in memory using EFI APIs when still running in
the boot services, given that EFI support already implies a relocatable
kernel. This means that decompression in place is never necessary, nor
is moving the compressed image from one end to the other.

Since EFI already maps all of memory 1:1, it is also unnecessary to
create new page tables or handle page faults when decompressing the
kernel. That means there is also no need to replace the special
exception handlers for SEV. Generally, there is little need to do
any of the things that the decompressor does beyond

- initialize SEV encryption, if needed,
- perform the 4/5 level paging switch, if needed,
- decompress the kernel
- relocate the kernel

So do all of this from the EFI stub code, and avoid the bare metal
decompressor altogether.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807162720.545787-24-ardb@kernel.org

show more ...

x86/efistub: Perform SNP feature test while running in the firmware

Before refactoring the EFI stub boot flow to avoid the legacy bare metal
decompressor, duplicate the SNP feature check in the EFI

x86/efistub: Perform SNP feature test while running in the firmware

Before refactoring the EFI stub boot flow to avoid the legacy bare metal
decompressor, duplicate the SNP feature check in the EFI stub before
handing over to the kernel proper.

The SNP feature check can be performed while running under the EFI boot
services, which means it can force the boot to fail gracefully and
return an error to the bootloader if the loaded kernel does not
implement support for all the features that the hypervisor enabled.

Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230807162720.545787-23-ardb@kernel.org

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/1

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

Need to pull in b3e4aae612ec ("drm/i915/hdcp: Modify hdcp_gsc_message msg sending mechanism") as
a dependency for https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/121735/

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next

Backmerging to get v6.5-rc2.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge tag 'v6.4' into next

Sync up with mainline to bring in updates to shared infrastructure.

ASoC: Merge v6.5-rc2

Get a similar baseline to my other branches, and fixes for people using
the branch.

Merge v6.5-rc1 into drm-misc-fixes

Boris needs 6.5-rc1 in drm-misc-fixes to prevent a conflict.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>

Merge branch 'master' into mm-hotfixes-stable

Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 SEV updates from Borislav Petkov:

- Some SEV and CC platform helpers cleanup and simplifications now

Merge tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 SEV updates from Borislav Petkov:

- Some SEV and CC platform helpers cleanup and simplifications now that
the usage patterns are becoming apparent

[ I'm sure I'm the only one that has gets confused by all the TLAs, but
in case there are others: here SEV is AMD's "Secure Encrypted
Virtualization" and CC is generic "Confidential Computing".

There's also Intel SGX (Software Guard Extensions) and TDX (Trust
Domain Extensions), along with all the vendor memory encryption
extensions (SME, TSME, TME, and WTF).

And then we have arm64 with RMA and CCA, and I probably forgot another
dozen or so related acronyms - Linus ]

* tag 'x86_sev_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/coco: Get rid of accessor functions
x86/sev: Get rid of special sev_es_enable_key
x86/coco: Mark cc_platform_has() and descendants noinstr

show more ...

Merge tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov:

- Add support for unaccepted memory as specified i

Merge tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 confidential computing update from Borislav Petkov:

- Add support for unaccepted memory as specified in the UEFI spec v2.9.

The gist of it all is that Intel TDX and AMD SEV-SNP confidential
computing guests define the notion of accepting memory before using
it and thus preventing a whole set of attacks against such guests
like memory replay and the like.

There are a couple of strategies of how memory should be accepted -
the current implementation does an on-demand way of accepting.

* tag 'x86_cc_for_v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
virt: sevguest: Add CONFIG_CRYPTO dependency
x86/efi: Safely enable unaccepted memory in UEFI
x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable
x86/sev: Allow for use of the early boot GHCB for PSC requests
x86/sev: Put PSC struct on the stack in prep for unaccepted memory support
x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages
x86/tdx: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/tdx: Refactor try_accept_one()
x86/tdx: Make _tdx_hypercall() and __tdx_module_call() available in boot stub
efi/unaccepted: Avoid load_unaligned_zeropad() stepping into unaccepted memory
efi: Add unaccepted memory support
x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory
efi/libstub: Implement support for unaccepted memory
efi/x86: Get full memory map in allocate_e820()
mm: Add support for unaccepted memory

show more ...

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-misc-next-fixes

Backmerging to sync drm-misc-next-fixes with drm-misc-next.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>

Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base

Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via
drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patche

Merge branch 'drm-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm into msm-next-lumag-base

Merge the drm-next tree to pick up the DRM DSC helpers (merged via
drm-intel-next tree). MSM DSC v1.2 patches depend on these helpers.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>

show more ...

x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support

Add SNP-specific hooks to the unaccepted memory support in the boot
path (__accept_memory()) and the core kernel (accept_memory()) in order
to sup

x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support

Add SNP-specific hooks to the unaccepted memory support in the boot
path (__accept_memory()) and the core kernel (accept_memory()) in order
to support booting SNP guests when unaccepted memory is present. Without
this support, SNP guests will fail to boot and/or panic() when unaccepted
memory is present in the EFI memory map.

The process of accepting memory under SNP involves invoking the hypervisor
to perform a page state change for the page to private memory and then
issuing a PVALIDATE instruction to accept the page.

Since the boot path and the core kernel paths perform similar operations,
move the pvalidate_pages() and vmgexit_psc() functions into sev-shared.c
to avoid code duplication.

Create the new header file arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.h because adding
the function declaration to any of the existing SEV related header files
pulls in too many other header files, causing the build to fail.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a52fa69f460fd1876d70074b20ad68210dfc31dd.1686063086.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com

show more ...

x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable

In advance of providing support for unaccepted memory, request 2M Page
State Change (PSC) requests when the address range allows for it. By using
a 2M p

x86/sev: Use large PSC requests if applicable

In advance of providing support for unaccepted memory, request 2M Page
State Change (PSC) requests when the address range allows for it. By using
a 2M page size, more PSC operations can be handled in a single request to
the hypervisor. The hypervisor will determine if it can accommodate the
larger request by checking the mapping in the nested page table. If mapped
as a large page, then the 2M page request can be performed, otherwise the
2M page request will be broken down into 512 4K page requests. This is
still more efficient than having the guest perform multiple PSC requests
in order to process the 512 4K pages.

In conjunction with the 2M PSC requests, attempt to perform the associated
PVALIDATE instruction of the page using the 2M page size. If PVALIDATE
fails with a size mismatch, then fallback to validating 512 4K pages. To
do this, page validation is modified to work with the PSC structure and
not just a virtual address range.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/050d17b460dfc237b51d72082e5df4498d3513cb.1686063086.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com

show more ...

x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages

When calculating an end address based on an unsigned int number of pages,
any value greater than or equal to 0x100000 that is shift P

x86/sev: Fix calculation of end address based on number of pages

When calculating an end address based on an unsigned int number of pages,
any value greater than or equal to 0x100000 that is shift PAGE_SHIFT bits
results in a 0 value, resulting in an invalid end address. Change the
number of pages variable in various routines from an unsigned int to an
unsigned long to calculate the end address correctly.

Fixes: 5e5ccff60a29 ("x86/sev: Add helper for validating pages in early enc attribute changes")
Fixes: dc3f3d2474b8 ("x86/mm: Validate memory when changing the C-bit")
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6a6e4eea0e1414402bac747744984fa4e9c01bb6.1686063086.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com

show more ...

Merge tag 'v6.4-rc4' into wpan-next/staging

Linux 6.4-rc4

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:

c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko

Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-gt-next

For conflict avoidance we need the following commit:

c9a9f18d3ad8 drm/i915/huc: use const struct bus_type pointers

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

show more ...