/openbmc/openbmc/poky/meta/recipes-core/glib-2.0/glib-2.0/ |
H A D | skip-timeout.patch | 24 g_test_add_func ("/timeout/weeks-overflow", test_weeks_overflow);
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/nvdimm/ |
H A D | maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 51 patch set requires more than 2 weeks of review, -rc4 is already too late
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ |
H A D | submitting-patches.rst | 79 maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it.
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/process/ |
H A D | maintainer-netdev.rst | 42 to Linus for merging into the mainline tree. After the two weeks, the 77 The accumulated new content of the past ~10 weeks will be passed onto 92 Shortly after the two weeks have passed (and vX.Y-rc1 is released), the 387 too long (weeks) between postings either as it will make it harder for reviewers
|
H A D | howto.rst | 252 linux-next for a few weeks. The preferred way to submit big changes 256 - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released and the focus is on making the 270 process should last around 6 weeks. 294 two weeks, but it can be longer if there are no pressing problems. A
|
H A D | handling-regressions.rst | 49 for most regressions should be merged within two weeks, but some need to be 127 into the issue weeks, months, or years later. These tags are also crucial for 144 than three weeks after the regression's culprit was identified. Ideally it 180 within the next three weeks. One or two Sundays later are acceptable, if the 480 three weeks means that I will revert, and I will stop pulling apparmor
|
H A D | stable-kernel-rules.rst | 126 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # after 4 weeks in mainline
|
H A D | 2.Process.rst | 49 The merge window lasts for approximately two weeks. At the end of this 57 Over the next six to ten weeks, only patches which fix problems should be
|
H A D | submitting-patches.rst | 375 weeks with the word "RESEND" added to the subject line:: 703 weeks, months or even years later, it can give the reader the needed
|
H A D | coding-style.rst | 469 to understand what you did 2 weeks from now.
|
/openbmc/docs/tof/ |
H A D | contract.md | 84 the next TOF meeting agenda after 2 weeks.
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/maintainer/ |
H A D | feature-and-driver-maintainers.rst | 37 to as long as a few weeks in slower moving parts of the kernel.
|
/openbmc/docs/ |
H A D | meta-layer-guidelines.md | 48 process. If the Yocto process has gone several weeks without responses,
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/driver-api/media/ |
H A D | maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 201 to ping if you don't get a feedback in a couple of weeks or to ask
|
/openbmc/bmcweb/redfish-core/include/utils/extern/ |
H A D | date.h | 194 using weeks = std::chrono::duration variable 5785 auto wn = duration_cast<weeks>(ld - st).count() + 1; 5833 auto wn = duration_cast<weeks>(ld - st).count() + 1; 5910 auto wn = duration_cast<weeks>(ld - st).count() + 1; 7730 (Monday-Thursday) + weeks{V-1} + 7749 weeks{U-1} + 7768 weeks{W-1} + 7823 auto V_trial = duration_cast<weeks>(sd - start).count() + 1; 7831 auto U_trial = floor<weeks>(sys_days(ymd) - start).count() + 1; 7838 auto W_trial = floor<weeks>(sys_days(ymd) - start).count() + 1;
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/admin-guide/ |
H A D | reporting-regressions.rst | 227 should be fixed within two weeks. 281 weeks later this solution can become impossible, as some software might have
|
H A D | reporting-issues.rst | 815 In about two out of every nine to ten weeks, mainline might point you to a 840 take a few days or weeks. Another reason: the fix you hope for might be too 1407 In these cases wait two (better: three) weeks before sending a friendly 1418 After the reminder wait three more weeks for replies. If you still don't get a 1640 weeks, but sometimes it takes a bit longer.
|
H A D | quickly-build-trimmed-linux.rst | 754 a few weeks. You can automate this with `modprobed-db
|
/openbmc/u-boot/doc/uImage.FIT/ |
H A D | signature.txt | 463 <n>w = key expires in n weeks
|
/openbmc/u-boot/tools/patman/ |
H A D | README | 445 1. When you change back to the us-cmd branch days or weeks later all your
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/filesystems/ |
H A D | xfs-self-describing-metadata.rst | 33 to analyse and so that analysis blows out towards weeks/months of forensic work.
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/power/ |
H A D | swsusp.rst | 334 broken in weeks later and sensitive data which you thought were
|
/openbmc/qemu/docs/devel/ |
H A D | submitting-a-patch.rst | 579 resolve the problems. It may take a couple of weeks between when your
|
/openbmc/linux/Documentation/bpf/ |
H A D | bpf_devel_QA.rst | 239 During those two weeks of merge window, we might ask you to resend
|
/openbmc/openbmc/poky/meta/recipes-bsp/lrzsz/lrzsz-0.12.20/ |
H A D | autotools-update.patch | 970 - This was necessary since a change in _nl_find_msg several weeks
|