Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16, v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4 |
|
#
bbaf1ff0 |
| 23-Jun-2023 |
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> |
bpf: Replace deprecated -target with --target= for Clang
The -target option has been deprecated since clang 3.4 in 2013. Therefore, use the preferred --target=bpf form instead. This also matches how
bpf: Replace deprecated -target with --target= for Clang
The -target option has been deprecated since clang 3.4 in 2013. Therefore, use the preferred --target=bpf form instead. This also matches how we use --target= in scripts/Makefile.clang.
Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/274b6f0c87a6a1798de0a68135afc7f95def6277 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230624001856.1903733-1-maskray@google.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20 |
|
#
0f10f647 |
| 14-Mar-2023 |
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> |
bpf, docs: Use internal linking for link to netdev subsystem doc
Commit d56b0c461d19da ("bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target") attempts to fix linking problem to undefined "netdev-FAQ" label in
bpf, docs: Use internal linking for link to netdev subsystem doc
Commit d56b0c461d19da ("bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target") attempts to fix linking problem to undefined "netdev-FAQ" label introduced in 287f4fa99a5281 ("docs: Update references to netdev-FAQ") by changing internal cross reference to netdev subsystem documentation (Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst) to external one at docs.kernel.org. However, the linking problem is still not resolved, as the generated link points to non-existent netdev-FAQ section of the external doc, which when clicked, will instead going to the top of the doc.
Revert back to internal linking by simply mention the doc path while massaging the leading text to the link, since the netdev subsystem doc contains no FAQs but rather general information about the subsystem.
Fixes: d56b0c461d19 ("bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target") Fixes: 287f4fa99a52 ("docs: Update references to netdev-FAQ") Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230314074449.23620-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15 |
|
#
b7abcd9c |
| 28-Feb-2023 |
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> |
bpf, doc: Link to submitting-patches.rst for general patch submission info
The link for patch submission information in general refers to index page for "Working with the kernel development communit
bpf, doc: Link to submitting-patches.rst for general patch submission info
The link for patch submission information in general refers to index page for "Working with the kernel development community" section of kernel docs, whereas the link should have been Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst instead.
Fix it by replacing the index target with the appropriate doc.
Fixes: 542228384888f5 ("bpf, doc: convert bpf_devel_QA.rst to use RST formatting") Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230228074523.11493-3-bagasdotme@gmail.com
show more ...
|
#
32db18d6 |
| 28-Feb-2023 |
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> |
bpf, doc: Do not link to docs.kernel.org for kselftest link
The question on how to run BPF selftests have a reference link to kernel selftest documentation (Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst). H
bpf, doc: Do not link to docs.kernel.org for kselftest link
The question on how to run BPF selftests have a reference link to kernel selftest documentation (Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst). However, it uses external link to the documentation at kernel.org/docs (aka docs.kernel.org) instead, which requires Internet access.
Fix this and replace the link with internal linking, by using :doc: directive while keeping the anchor text.
Fixes: b7a27c3aafa252 ("bpf, doc: howto use/run the BPF selftests") Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230228074523.11493-2-bagasdotme@gmail.com
show more ...
|
#
d56b0c46 |
| 02-Mar-2023 |
David Vernet <void@manifault.com> |
bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target
The BPF devel Q&A documentation page makes frequent reference to the netdev-QA page via the netdev-FAQ rst link. This link is currently broken, as is evidenc
bpf, docs: Fix link to netdev-FAQ target
The BPF devel Q&A documentation page makes frequent reference to the netdev-QA page via the netdev-FAQ rst link. This link is currently broken, as is evidenced by the build output when making BPF docs:
./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:150: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:206: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:231: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:396: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq' ./Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst:412: WARNING: undefined label: 'netdev-faq'
Fix the links to point to the actual netdev-faq page.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302183918.54190-1-void@manifault.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.1.14, v6.1.13 |
|
#
a07484c0 |
| 22-Feb-2023 |
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> |
bpf, docs: Fix link to BTF doc
Ross reported broken link to BTF documentation (Documentation/bpf/btf.rst) in Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst. The link in question is written using external link s
bpf, docs: Fix link to BTF doc
Ross reported broken link to BTF documentation (Documentation/bpf/btf.rst) in Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst. The link in question is written using external link syntax, with the target refers to BTF doc in reST source (btf.rst), which doesn't exist in resulting HTML output.
Fix the link by replacing external link syntax with simply writing out the target doc, which the link will be generated to the correct HTML doc target.
Fixes: 6736aa793c2b5f ("selftests/bpf: Add general instructions for test execution") Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/Y++09LKx25dtR4Ow@google.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230222083530.26136-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80 |
|
#
383f1a8d |
| 16-Nov-2022 |
Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> |
bpf/docs: Include blank lines between bullet points in bpf_devel_QA.rst
Commit 26a9b433cf08 ("bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission") caused a warning to be generated when compil
bpf/docs: Include blank lines between bullet points in bpf_devel_QA.rst
Commit 26a9b433cf08 ("bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission") caused a warning to be generated when compiling the documentation:
> bpf_devel_QA.rst:55: WARNING: Unexpected indentation. > bpf_devel_QA.rst:56: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line
This change fixes the problem by inserting the required blank lines.
Fixes: 26a9b433cf08 ("bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission") Reported-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116174358.2744613-1-deso@posteo.net
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.0.9, v5.15.79 |
|
#
26a9b433 |
| 14-Nov-2022 |
Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> |
bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission
This change documents the process for running the BPF CI before submitting a patch to the upstream mailing list, similar to what happens if
bpf/docs: Document how to run CI without patch submission
This change documents the process for running the BPF CI before submitting a patch to the upstream mailing list, similar to what happens if a patch is send to bpf@vger.kernel.org: it builds kernel and selftests and runs the latter on different architecture (but it notably does not cover stylistic checks such as cover letter verification).
Running BPF CI this way can help achieve better test coverage ahead of patch submission than merely running locally (say, using tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh), as additional architectures may be covered as well.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221114211501.2068684-1-deso@posteo.net
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3, v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1, v5.15.72, v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33 |
|
#
8df01363 |
| 29-Mar-2022 |
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> |
docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages
The documentation for the tip tree is really in quite a similar spirit to the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ to the process docs as well.
Sig
docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages
The documentation for the tip tree is really in quite a similar spirit to the netdev-FAQ. Move the netdev-FAQ to the process docs as well.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.15.32, v5.15.31, v5.17, v5.15.30, v5.15.29, v5.15.28, v5.15.27, v5.15.26, v5.15.25, v5.15.24, v5.15.23, v5.15.22, v5.15.21, v5.15.20, v5.15.19, v5.15.18, v5.15.17, v5.4.173, v5.15.16, v5.15.15, v5.16, v5.15.10, v5.15.9, v5.15.8, v5.15.7, v5.15.6, v5.15.5, v5.15.4, v5.15.3, v5.15.2, v5.15.1, v5.15, v5.14.14, v5.14.13, v5.14.12, v5.14.11, v5.14.10, v5.14.9, v5.14.8, v5.14.7, v5.14.6, v5.10.67, v5.10.66, v5.14.5, v5.14.4, v5.10.65, v5.14.3, v5.10.64, v5.14.2, v5.10.63, v5.14.1, v5.10.62, v5.14, v5.10.61, v5.10.60, v5.10.53, v5.10.52, v5.10.51, v5.10.50, v5.10.49, v5.13, v5.10.46, v5.10.43, v5.10.42, v5.10.41, v5.10.40, v5.10.39, v5.4.119, v5.10.36, v5.10.35, v5.10.34, v5.4.116, v5.10.33, v5.12 |
|
#
350a62ca |
| 22-Apr-2021 |
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> |
bpf: Document the pahole release info related to libbpf in bpf_devel_QA.rst
pahole starts to use libbpf definitions and APIs since v1.13 after the commit 21507cd3e97b ("pahole: add libbpf as submodu
bpf: Document the pahole release info related to libbpf in bpf_devel_QA.rst
pahole starts to use libbpf definitions and APIs since v1.13 after the commit 21507cd3e97b ("pahole: add libbpf as submodule under lib/bpf"). It works well with the git repository because the libbpf submodule will use "git submodule update --init --recursive" to update.
Unfortunately, the default github release source code does not contain libbpf submodule source code and this will cause build issues, the tarball from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/ is same with github, you can get the source tarball with corresponding libbpf submodule codes from
https://fedorapeople.org/~acme/dwarves
This change documents the above issues to give more information so that we can get the tarball from the right place, early discussion is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/2de4aad5-fa9e-1c39-3c92-9bb9229d0966@loongson.cn/
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1619141010-12521-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
show more ...
|
#
64ef3ddf |
| 21-Apr-2021 |
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> |
bpf, doc: Fix some invalid links in bpf_devel_QA.rst
There exist some errors "404 Not Found" when I click the link of "MAINTAINERS" [1], "samples/bpf/" [2] and "selftests" [3] in the documentation "
bpf, doc: Fix some invalid links in bpf_devel_QA.rst
There exist some errors "404 Not Found" when I click the link of "MAINTAINERS" [1], "samples/bpf/" [2] and "selftests" [3] in the documentation "HOWTO interact with BPF subsystem" [4].
As Alexei Starovoitov suggested, just remove "MAINTAINERS" and "samples/bpf/" links and use correct link of "selftests".
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/MAINTAINERS [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/samples/bpf/ [3] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ [4] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.html
Fixes: 542228384888 ("bpf, doc: convert bpf_devel_QA.rst to use RST formatting") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1619062560-30483-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.10.32, v5.10.31, v5.10.30, v5.10.27, v5.10.26, v5.10.25, v5.10.24, v5.10.23, v5.10.22, v5.10.21, v5.10.20, v5.10.19, v5.4.101, v5.10.18, v5.10.17, v5.11, v5.10.16, v5.10.15, v5.10.14 |
|
#
628add78 |
| 21-Jan-2021 |
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> |
bpf, docs: Update build procedure for manually compiling LLVM and Clang
The current LLVM and Clang build procedure in samples/bpf/README.rst is out of date. See below that the links are not accessib
bpf, docs: Update build procedure for manually compiling LLVM and Clang
The current LLVM and Clang build procedure in samples/bpf/README.rst is out of date. See below that the links are not accessible any more.
$ git clone http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git Cloning into 'llvm'... fatal: unable to access 'http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git/': Maximum (20) redirects followed $ git clone --depth 1 http://llvm.org/git/clang.git Cloning into 'clang'... fatal: unable to access 'http://llvm.org/git/clang.git/': Maximum (20) redirects followed
The LLVM community has adopted new ways to build the compiler. There are different ways to build LLVM and Clang, the Clang Getting Started page [1] has one way. As Yonghong said, it is better to copy the build procedure in Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst to keep consistent.
I verified the procedure and it is proved to be feasible, so we should update README.rst to reflect the reality. At the same time, update the related comment in Makefile.
Additionally, as Fangrui said, the dir llvm-project/llvm/build/install is not used, BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=OFF is the default option [2], so also change Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst together.
At last, we recommend that developers who want the fastest incremental builds use the Ninja build system [1], you can find it in your system's package manager, usually the package is ninja or ninja-build [3], so add ninja to build dependencies suggested by Nathan.
[1] https://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html [2] https://www.llvm.org/docs/CMake.html [3] https://github.com/ninja-build/ninja/wiki/Pre-built-Ninja-packages
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1611279584-26047-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9 |
|
#
ebb034b1 |
| 11-Oct-2020 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Migrate from patchwork.ozlabs.org to patchwork.kernel.org.
Move the bpf/bpf-next patch processing queue to patchwork.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-b
bpf: Migrate from patchwork.ozlabs.org to patchwork.kernel.org.
Move the bpf/bpf-next patch processing queue to patchwork.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201011200149.66537-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60 |
|
#
4d0d1673 |
| 21-Aug-2020 |
Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com> |
docs: Correct subject prefix and update LLVM info
bpf_devel_QA.rst:152 The subject prefix information is not accurate, it should be 'PATCH bpf-next v2'
Also update LLVM version info and add informa
docs: Correct subject prefix and update LLVM info
bpf_devel_QA.rst:152 The subject prefix information is not accurate, it should be 'PATCH bpf-next v2'
Also update LLVM version info and add information about ‘-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD’ to prompt the developer to build the desired target.
Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200821052817.46887-1-Jianlin.Lv@arm.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53 |
|
#
009abf5b |
| 18-Jul-2020 |
Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> |
docs: bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst: fix reference to nonexistent document
Fix the following sphinx warning:
bpf_devel_QA.rst:444: WARNING: Unknown target name: "documentation/bpf/btf.rst"
No target was de
docs: bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst: fix reference to nonexistent document
Fix the following sphinx warning:
bpf_devel_QA.rst:444: WARNING: Unknown target name: "documentation/bpf/btf.rst"
No target was defined for 'btf.rst' in the document. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200718165107.625847-6-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43 |
|
#
6736aa79 |
| 22-May-2020 |
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add general instructions for test execution
Getting a clean BPF selftests run involves ensuring latest trunk LLVM/clang are used, pahole is recent (>=1.16) and config matches the spec
selftests/bpf: Add general instructions for test execution
Getting a clean BPF selftests run involves ensuring latest trunk LLVM/clang are used, pahole is recent (>=1.16) and config matches the specified config file as closely as possible. Add to bpf_devel_QA.rst and point tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst to it.
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1590146674-25485-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.4.42, v5.4.41, v5.4.40, v5.4.39, v5.4.38, v5.4.37, v5.4.36, v5.4.35, v5.4.34, v5.4.33, v5.4.32, v5.4.31, v5.4.30, v5.4.29, v5.6, v5.4.28, v5.4.27, v5.4.26, v5.4.25, v5.4.24, v5.4.23, v5.4.22 |
|
#
e42da4c6 |
| 20-Feb-2020 |
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> |
docs/bpf: Update bpf development Q/A file
bpf now has its own mailing list bpf@vger.kernel.org. Update the bpf_devel_QA.rst file to reflect this.
Also llvm has switch to github with llvm and clang
docs/bpf: Update bpf development Q/A file
bpf now has its own mailing list bpf@vger.kernel.org. Update the bpf_devel_QA.rst file to reflect this.
Also llvm has switch to github with llvm and clang in the same repo https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git. Update the QA file with newer build instructions.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200221004354.930952-1-yhs@fb.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.4.21, v5.4.20, v5.4.19, v5.4.18, v5.4.17, v5.4.16, v5.5, v5.4.15, v5.4.14, v5.4.13, v5.4.12, v5.4.11, v5.4.10, v5.4.9, v5.4.8, v5.4.7, v5.4.6, v5.4.5, v5.4.4, v5.4.3, v5.3.15, v5.4.2, v5.4.1, v5.3.14, v5.4, v5.3.13, v5.3.12, v5.3.11, v5.3.10, v5.3.9, v5.3.8, v5.3.7, v5.3.6, v5.3.5, v5.3.4, v5.3.3, v5.3.2, v5.3.1, v5.3, v5.2.14, v5.3-rc8, v5.2.13, v5.2.12, v5.2.11, v5.2.10, v5.2.9, v5.2.8, v5.2.7, v5.2.6, v5.2.5, v5.2.4, v5.2.3, v5.2.2, v5.2.1, v5.2, v5.1.16, v5.1.15, v5.1.14, v5.1.13, v5.1.12, v5.1.11, v5.1.10, v5.1.9, v5.1.8, v5.1.7, v5.1.6, v5.1.5, v5.1.4, v5.1.3, v5.1.2, v5.1.1, v5.0.14, v5.1, v5.0.13, v5.0.12, v5.0.11, v5.0.10, v5.0.9, v5.0.8, v5.0.7, v5.0.6, v5.0.5, v5.0.4, v5.0.3, v4.19.29, v5.0.2, v4.19.28, v5.0.1, v4.19.27, v5.0, v4.19.26, v4.19.25, v4.19.24, v4.19.23, v4.19.22, v4.19.21, v4.19.20, v4.19.19, v4.19.18, v4.19.17, v4.19.16, v4.19.15, v4.19.14, v4.19.13, v4.19.12, v4.19.11, v4.19.10, v4.19.9, v4.19.8, v4.19.7, v4.19.6, v4.19.5, v4.19.4, v4.18.20, v4.19.3, v4.18.19, v4.19.2, v4.18.18, v4.18.17, v4.19.1, v4.19, v4.18.16, v4.18.15, v4.18.14, v4.18.13, v4.18.12, v4.18.11, v4.18.10, v4.18.9, v4.18.7, v4.18.6, v4.18.5, v4.17.18, v4.18.4, v4.18.3, v4.17.17, v4.18.2, v4.17.16, v4.17.15, v4.18.1, v4.18, v4.17.14, v4.17.13, v4.17.12, v4.17.11 |
|
#
287f4fa9 |
| 26-Jul-2018 |
Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> |
docs: Update references to netdev-FAQ
File 'Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt' has been converted to RST format. We should update all links/references to point to the new file.
Update refere
docs: Update references to netdev-FAQ
File 'Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt' has been converted to RST format. We should update all links/references to point to the new file.
Update references to netdev-FAQ
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v4.17.10, v4.17.9, v4.17.8, v4.17.7, v4.17.6, v4.17.5, v4.17.4, v4.17.3, v4.17.2, v4.17.1, v4.17 |
|
#
b7a27c3a |
| 14-May-2018 |
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> |
bpf, doc: howto use/run the BPF selftests
I always forget howto run the BPF selftests. Thus, lets add that info to the QA document.
Documentation was based on Cilium's documentation: http://cilium
bpf, doc: howto use/run the BPF selftests
I always forget howto run the BPF selftests. Thus, lets add that info to the QA document.
Documentation was based on Cilium's documentation: http://cilium.readthedocs.io/en/latest/bpf/#verifying-the-setup
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
54222838 |
| 14-May-2018 |
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> |
bpf, doc: convert bpf_devel_QA.rst to use RST formatting
Same story as bpf_design_QA.rst RST format conversion.
Again thanks to Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> for fixes and patches t
bpf, doc: convert bpf_devel_QA.rst to use RST formatting
Same story as bpf_design_QA.rst RST format conversion.
Again thanks to Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> for fixes and patches that have been squashed.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
#
192092fa |
| 14-May-2018 |
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> |
bpf, doc: rename txt files to rst files
This will cause them to get auto rendered, e.g. when viewing them on GitHub. Followup patches will correct the content to be RST compliant.
Also adjust READM
bpf, doc: rename txt files to rst files
This will cause them to get auto rendered, e.g. when viewing them on GitHub. Followup patches will correct the content to be RST compliant.
Also adjust README.rst to point to the renamed files.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.10, v5.8.17, v5.8.16, v5.8.15, v5.9 |
|
#
ebb034b1 |
| 11-Oct-2020 |
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> |
bpf: Migrate from patchwork.ozlabs.org to patchwork.kernel.org. Move the bpf/bpf-next patch processing queue to patchwork.kernel.org. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.o
bpf: Migrate from patchwork.ozlabs.org to patchwork.kernel.org. Move the bpf/bpf-next patch processing queue to patchwork.kernel.org. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201011200149.66537-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.8.14, v5.8.13, v5.8.12, v5.8.11, v5.8.10, v5.8.9, v5.8.8, v5.8.7, v5.8.6, v5.4.62, v5.8.5, v5.8.4, v5.4.61, v5.8.3, v5.4.60 |
|
#
4d0d1673 |
| 21-Aug-2020 |
Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com> |
docs: Correct subject prefix and update LLVM info bpf_devel_QA.rst:152 The subject prefix information is not accurate, it should be 'PATCH bpf-next v2' Also update LLVM version
docs: Correct subject prefix and update LLVM info bpf_devel_QA.rst:152 The subject prefix information is not accurate, it should be 'PATCH bpf-next v2' Also update LLVM version info and add information about ‘-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD’ to prompt the developer to build the desired target. Signed-off-by: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200821052817.46887-1-Jianlin.Lv@arm.com
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.8.2, v5.4.59, v5.8.1, v5.4.58, v5.4.57, v5.4.56, v5.8, v5.7.12, v5.4.55, v5.7.11, v5.4.54, v5.7.10, v5.4.53 |
|
#
009abf5b |
| 18-Jul-2020 |
Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> |
docs: bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst: fix reference to nonexistent document Fix the following sphinx warning: bpf_devel_QA.rst:444: WARNING: Unknown target name: "documentation/bpf/btf.rs
docs: bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst: fix reference to nonexistent document Fix the following sphinx warning: bpf_devel_QA.rst:444: WARNING: Unknown target name: "documentation/bpf/btf.rst" No target was defined for 'btf.rst' in the document. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200718165107.625847-6-dwlsalmeida@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
show more ...
|
Revision tags: v5.4.52, v5.7.9, v5.7.8, v5.4.51, v5.4.50, v5.7.7, v5.4.49, v5.7.6, v5.7.5, v5.4.48, v5.7.4, v5.7.3, v5.4.47, v5.4.46, v5.7.2, v5.4.45, v5.7.1, v5.4.44, v5.7, v5.4.43 |
|
#
6736aa79 |
| 22-May-2020 |
Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> |
selftests/bpf: Add general instructions for test execution Getting a clean BPF selftests run involves ensuring latest trunk LLVM/clang are used, pahole is recent (>=1.16) and config matc
selftests/bpf: Add general instructions for test execution Getting a clean BPF selftests run involves ensuring latest trunk LLVM/clang are used, pahole is recent (>=1.16) and config matches the specified config file as closely as possible. Add to bpf_devel_QA.rst and point tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst to it. Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1590146674-25485-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com
show more ...
|