Searched hist:f1ebcc74 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | ctree.c | f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | transaction.c | f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | ctree.h | f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
f1ebcc74 Mon Nov 14 19:48:06 CST 2011 Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
The btrfs snapshotting code requires that once a root has been
snapshotted, we don't change it during a commit.
But there are two cases to lead to tree corruptions:
1) multi-thread snapshots can commit serveral snapshots in a transaction,
and this may change the src root when processing the following pending
snapshots, which lead to the former snapshots corruptions;
2) the free inode cache was changing the roots when it root the cache,
which lead to corruptions.
This fixes things by making sure we force COW the block after we create a
snapshot during commiting a transaction, then any changes to the roots
will result in COW, and we get all the fs roots and snapshot roots to be
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
|