| /openbmc/u-boot/arch/arm/lib/ |
| H A D | spl.c | b8cb51d0de9457c270e63e876712213c5cbbf5dc Mon Jul 18 11:01:02 CDT 2016 Jeremy Hunt <Jeremy.Hunt@DEShawResearch.com> armv8: spl: Call board_init_r from crt0_64 in SPL
As part of the startup process for boards using the SPL, the
meaning of board_init_f changed such that it should return normally
rather than calling board_init_r directly. (see
db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a )
This was fixed in 32-bit arm, but broke when SPL was added to
64 bit arm. This fixes crt0_64 so that it calls board_init_r
during the SPL and removes the direct call from board_init_f
from the arm SPL example.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Hunt <Jeremy.Hunt@DEShawResearch.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| H A D | crt0_64.S | b8cb51d0de9457c270e63e876712213c5cbbf5dc Mon Jul 18 11:01:02 CDT 2016 Jeremy Hunt <Jeremy.Hunt@DEShawResearch.com> armv8: spl: Call board_init_r from crt0_64 in SPL
As part of the startup process for boards using the SPL, the
meaning of board_init_f changed such that it should return normally
rather than calling board_init_r directly. (see
db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a )
This was fixed in 32-bit arm, but broke when SPL was added to
64 bit arm. This fixes crt0_64 so that it calls board_init_r
during the SPL and removes the direct call from board_init_f
from the arm SPL example.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Hunt <Jeremy.Hunt@DEShawResearch.com>
Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
|
| H A D | crt0.S | db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a Tue Mar 03 09:03:00 CST 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger stack can be used.
This is an abuse of lowlevel_init(). That function should only be used for
essential start-up code which cannot be delayed. An example of a valid use is
when only part of the SPL code is visible/executable, and the SoC must be set
up so that board_init_f() can be reached. It should not be used for SDRAM
init, console init, etc.
Add a CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R option, which allows the stack to be moved to a new
address before board_init_r() is called in SPL.
The expected SPL flow (for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) is documented in the README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For version 1:
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| /openbmc/u-boot/ |
| H A D | Kconfig | db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a Tue Mar 03 09:03:00 CST 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger stack can be used.
This is an abuse of lowlevel_init(). That function should only be used for
essential start-up code which cannot be delayed. An example of a valid use is
when only part of the SPL code is visible/executable, and the SoC must be set
up so that board_init_f() can be reached. It should not be used for SDRAM
init, console init, etc.
Add a CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R option, which allows the stack to be moved to a new
address before board_init_r() is called in SPL.
The expected SPL flow (for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) is documented in the README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For version 1:
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| H A D | README | db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a Tue Mar 03 09:03:00 CST 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger stack can be used.
This is an abuse of lowlevel_init(). That function should only be used for
essential start-up code which cannot be delayed. An example of a valid use is
when only part of the SPL code is visible/executable, and the SoC must be set
up so that board_init_f() can be reached. It should not be used for SDRAM
init, console init, etc.
Add a CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R option, which allows the stack to be moved to a new
address before board_init_r() is called in SPL.
The expected SPL flow (for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) is documented in the README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For version 1:
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|
| /openbmc/u-boot/common/spl/ |
| H A D | spl.c | db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a Tue Mar 03 09:03:00 CST 2015 Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> arm: spl: Allow board_init_r() to run with a larger stack
At present SPL uses a single stack, either CONFIG_SPL_STACK or
CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR. Since some SPL features (such as MMC and
environment) require a lot of stack, some boards set CONFIG_SPL_STACK to
point into SDRAM. They then set up SDRAM very early, before board_init_f(),
so that the larger stack can be used.
This is an abuse of lowlevel_init(). That function should only be used for
essential start-up code which cannot be delayed. An example of a valid use is
when only part of the SPL code is visible/executable, and the SoC must be set
up so that board_init_f() can be reached. It should not be used for SDRAM
init, console init, etc.
Add a CONFIG_SPL_STACK_R option, which allows the stack to be moved to a new
address before board_init_r() is called in SPL.
The expected SPL flow (for CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK) is documented in the README.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
For version 1:
Acked-by: Albert ARIBAUD <albert.u.boot@aribaud.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Tested-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Tested-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
|