Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:db71ef79 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/mm/
H A Dhugetlb_cgroup.cdb71ef79 Tue May 04 20:35:07 CDT 2021 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe

Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in
non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being
called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing
to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as
pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1].

: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
:
: CPU0 CPU1
: ---- ----
: lock(hugetlb_lock);
: local_irq_disable();
: lock(slock-AF_INET);
: lock(hugetlb_lock);
: <Interrupt>
: lock(slock-AF_INET);

Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from
hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to
hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't
disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead
to a deadlock.

This commit addresses the issue by doing the following:
- Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of
changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls.
- Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner.
- Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
H A Dhugetlb.cdb71ef79 Tue May 04 20:35:07 CDT 2021 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe

Commit c77c0a8ac4c5 ("mm/hugetlb: defer freeing of huge pages if in
non-task context") was added to address the issue of free_huge_page being
called from irq context. That commit hands off free_huge_page processing
to a workqueue if !in_task. However, this doesn't cover all the cases as
pointed out by 0day bot lockdep report [1].

: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
:
: CPU0 CPU1
: ---- ----
: lock(hugetlb_lock);
: local_irq_disable();
: lock(slock-AF_INET);
: lock(hugetlb_lock);
: <Interrupt>
: lock(slock-AF_INET);

Shakeel has later explained that this is very likely TCP TX zerocopy from
hugetlb pages scenario when the networking code drops a last reference to
hugetlb page while having IRQ disabled. Hugetlb freeing path doesn't
disable IRQ while holding hugetlb_lock so a lock dependency chain can lead
to a deadlock.

This commit addresses the issue by doing the following:
- Make hugetlb_lock irq safe. This is mostly a simple process of
changing spin_*lock calls to spin_*lock_irq* calls.
- Make subpool lock irq safe in a similar manner.
- Revert the !in_task check and workqueue handoff.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/000000000000f1c03b05bc43aadc@google.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210409205254.242291-8-mike.kravetz@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>