Searched hist:d16c702f (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | ctree.c | d16c702f Wed Aug 19 01:35:50 CDT 2020 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: ctree: check key order before merging tree blocks
[BUG]
With a crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums():
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1156 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x16c/0x180
RSP: 0018:ffff976141257ab8 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff898a6b890930 RCX: 0000000004b70000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff976141257bae RDI: ffff976141257acf
RBP: ffff976141257b10 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffff9761412579a8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff976141257abe
R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffff898a6a8be578 R15: ffff976141257bae
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff898a77a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f779d9cd624 CR3: 000000022b2b4006 CR4: 00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
truncate_one_csum+0xac/0xf0
btrfs_del_csums+0x24f/0x3a0
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.72+0x5a7/0xbe0
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x539/0x1120
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xdb/0x1b0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x52/0x950
? start_transaction+0x94/0x450
transaction_kthread+0x163/0x190
kthread+0x105/0x140
? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x560/0x560
? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 93bf9db00e6c374e ]---
[CAUSE]
This crafted image has a tricky key order corruption:
checksum tree key (CSUM_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
node 29741056 level 1 items 14 free 107 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
...
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) block 29757440 gen 19
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) block 29753344 gen 19
...
leaf 29757440 items 5 free space 150 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 73785344 end 75497472 length 1712128
item 1 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75497472) itemoff 2319 itemsize 4
range start 75497472 end 75501568 length 4096
item 2 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75501568) itemoff 579 itemsize 1740
range start 75501568 end 77283328 length 1781760
item 3 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77283328) itemoff 575 itemsize 4
range start 77283328 end 77287424 length 4096
item 4 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 4120596480) itemoff 275 itemsize 300 <<<
range start 4120596480 end 4120903680 length 307200
leaf 29753344 items 3 free space 1936 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (18446744073457893366 EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 77594624 end 79306752 length 1712128
...
Note the item 4 key of leaf 29757440, which is obviously too large, and
even larger than the first key of the next leaf.
However it still follows the key order in that tree block, thus tree
checker is unable to detect it at read time, since tree checker can only
work inside one leaf, thus such complex corruption can't be detected in
advance.
[FIX]
The next time to detect such problem is at tree block merge time,
which is in push_node_left(), balance_node_right(), push_leaf_left() or
push_leaf_right().
Now we check if the key order of the right-most key of the left node is
larger than the left-most key of the right node.
By this we don't need to call the full tree-checker, while still keeping
the key order correct as key order in each node is already checked by
tree checker thus we only need to check the above two slots.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202833
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
d16c702f Wed Aug 19 01:35:50 CDT 2020 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: ctree: check key order before merging tree blocks
[BUG]
With a crafted image, btrfs can panic at btrfs_del_csums():
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:3188!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 1156 Comm: btrfs-transacti Not tainted 5.0.0-rc8+ #9
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x16c/0x180
RSP: 0018:ffff976141257ab8 EFLAGS: 00010202
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff898a6b890930 RCX: 0000000004b70000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff976141257bae RDI: ffff976141257acf
RBP: ffff976141257b10 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffff9761412579a8
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff976141257abe
R13: 0000000000000003 R14: ffff898a6a8be578 R15: ffff976141257bae
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff898a77a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f779d9cd624 CR3: 000000022b2b4006 CR4: 00000000000206f0
Call Trace:
truncate_one_csum+0xac/0xf0
btrfs_del_csums+0x24f/0x3a0
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.72+0x5a7/0xbe0
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x539/0x1120
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xdb/0x1b0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x52/0x950
? start_transaction+0x94/0x450
transaction_kthread+0x163/0x190
kthread+0x105/0x140
? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x560/0x560
? kthread_destroy_worker+0x50/0x50
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 93bf9db00e6c374e ]---
[CAUSE]
This crafted image has a tricky key order corruption:
checksum tree key (CSUM_TREE ROOT_ITEM 0)
node 29741056 level 1 items 14 free 107 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
...
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) block 29757440 gen 19
key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) block 29753344 gen 19
...
leaf 29757440 items 5 free space 150 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 73785344) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 73785344 end 75497472 length 1712128
item 1 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75497472) itemoff 2319 itemsize 4
range start 75497472 end 75501568 length 4096
item 2 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 75501568) itemoff 579 itemsize 1740
range start 75501568 end 77283328 length 1781760
item 3 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 77283328) itemoff 575 itemsize 4
range start 77283328 end 77287424 length 4096
item 4 key (EXTENT_CSUM EXTENT_CSUM 4120596480) itemoff 275 itemsize 300 <<<
range start 4120596480 end 4120903680 length 307200
leaf 29753344 items 3 free space 1936 generation 19 owner CSUM_TREE
item 0 key (18446744073457893366 EXTENT_CSUM 77594624) itemoff 2323 itemsize 1672
range start 77594624 end 79306752 length 1712128
...
Note the item 4 key of leaf 29757440, which is obviously too large, and
even larger than the first key of the next leaf.
However it still follows the key order in that tree block, thus tree
checker is unable to detect it at read time, since tree checker can only
work inside one leaf, thus such complex corruption can't be detected in
advance.
[FIX]
The next time to detect such problem is at tree block merge time,
which is in push_node_left(), balance_node_right(), push_leaf_left() or
push_leaf_right().
Now we check if the key order of the right-most key of the left node is
larger than the left-most key of the right node.
By this we don't need to call the full tree-checker, while still keeping
the key order correct as key order in each node is already checked by
tree checker thus we only need to check the above two slots.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202833
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|