Searched hist:c034363c (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/ |
| H A D | intel_atomic_plane.c | c034363c Thu Mar 03 13:12:01 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Pre-calculate plane relative data rate
Handle the plane relative data rate in exactly the same
way as we already handle the real data rate. Ie. pre-calculate
it during intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(), and assign/clear
it for the Y plane as needed. This should guarantee that the
tracking is 100% consistent, and makes me have to think less
when the same apporach is used by both types of data rate.
We might even want to consider replacing the relative
data rate with the real data rate entirely, but it's not
clear if that will produce less optimal plane ddb
allocations. So for now lets keep using the current approach.
v2: Rebase due to async flip wm optimization
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220303191207.27931-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_display_types.h | c034363c Thu Mar 03 13:12:01 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Pre-calculate plane relative data rate
Handle the plane relative data rate in exactly the same
way as we already handle the real data rate. Ie. pre-calculate
it during intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(), and assign/clear
it for the Y plane as needed. This should guarantee that the
tracking is 100% consistent, and makes me have to think less
when the same apporach is used by both types of data rate.
We might even want to consider replacing the relative
data rate with the real data rate entirely, but it's not
clear if that will produce less optimal plane ddb
allocations. So for now lets keep using the current approach.
v2: Rebase due to async flip wm optimization
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220303191207.27931-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | intel_display.c | c034363c Thu Mar 03 13:12:01 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Pre-calculate plane relative data rate
Handle the plane relative data rate in exactly the same
way as we already handle the real data rate. Ie. pre-calculate
it during intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(), and assign/clear
it for the Y plane as needed. This should guarantee that the
tracking is 100% consistent, and makes me have to think less
when the same apporach is used by both types of data rate.
We might even want to consider replacing the relative
data rate with the real data rate entirely, but it's not
clear if that will produce less optimal plane ddb
allocations. So for now lets keep using the current approach.
v2: Rebase due to async flip wm optimization
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220303191207.27931-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
|