/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvfw/ |
H A D | sec2.h | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
H A D | pmu.h | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/falcon/ |
H A D | qmgr.h | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
H A D | cmdq.c | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
H A D | msgq.c | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/include/nvkm/core/ |
H A D | falcon.h | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/ |
H A D | gp10b.c | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
H A D | gm20b.c | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|
/openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/sec2/ |
H A D | gp102.c | b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_
Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix.
This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now.
Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> b448a266 Tue Jun 09 07:52:04 CDT 2020 Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> drm/nouveau/nvfw: firmware structures should begin with nvfw_ Rename all structures that are used directly by firmware to have a nvfw_ prefix. This makes it easier to identify structures that have a fixed, specific layout. A future patch will define several more such structures, so it's important to be consistent now. Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi <ttabi@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
|