Searched hist:a48b73ec (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | extent_io.h | a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ioctl.c | a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | extent_io.c | a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
a48b73ec Mon Aug 10 10:42:27 CDT 2020 Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> btrfs: fix potential deadlock in the search ioctl
With the conversion of the tree locks to rwsem I got the following
lockdep splat:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
compsize/11122 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff889fabca8768 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
but task is already holding lock:
ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}:
down_write_nested+0x3b/0x70
__btrfs_tree_lock+0x24/0x120
btrfs_search_slot+0x756/0x990
btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xb4
__btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x270
btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x168/0x230
btrfs_work_helper+0xd4/0x570
process_one_work+0x2ad/0x5f0
worker_thread+0x3a/0x3d0
kthread+0x133/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0x9f/0x930
btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x50/0x440
btrfs_update_inode+0x8a/0xf0
btrfs_dirty_inode+0x5b/0xd0
touch_atime+0xa1/0xd0
btrfs_file_mmap+0x3f/0x60
mmap_region+0x3a4/0x640
do_mmap+0x376/0x580
vm_mmap_pgoff+0xd5/0x120
ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x193/0x230
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
-> #0 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&mm->mmap_lock#2 --> &delayed_node->mutex --> btrfs-fs-00
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
lock(btrfs-fs-00);
lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by compsize/11122:
#0: ffff889fe720fe40 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x39/0x180
stack backtrace:
CPU: 17 PID: 11122 Comm: compsize Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.8.0-rc7-00165-g04ec4da5f45f-dirty #922
Hardware name: Quanta Tioga Pass Single Side 01-0030993006/Tioga Pass Single Side, BIOS F08_3A18 12/20/2018
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x78/0xa0
check_noncircular+0x165/0x180
__lock_acquire+0x1272/0x2310
lock_acquire+0x9e/0x360
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
? find_held_lock+0x72/0x90
__might_fault+0x68/0x90
? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90
_copy_to_user+0x1e/0x80
copy_to_sk.isra.32+0x121/0x300
? btrfs_search_forward+0x2a6/0x360
search_ioctl+0x106/0x200
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2+0x7b/0xf0
btrfs_ioctl+0x106f/0x30a0
? __do_sys_newfstat+0x5a/0x70
? ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
ksys_ioctl+0x83/0xc0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x50/0x90
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
The problem is we're doing a copy_to_user() while holding tree locks,
which can deadlock if we have to do a page fault for the copy_to_user().
This exists even without my locking changes, so it needs to be fixed.
Rework the search ioctl to do the pre-fault and then
copy_to_user_nofault for the copying.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|