| H A D | relocation.c | 9d9ea1e6 Mon Jul 26 01:35:05 CDT 2021 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: subpage: fix relocation potentially overwriting last page data
[BUG]
When using the following script, btrfs will report data corruption after
one data balance with subpage support:
mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev
mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt
$fsstress -w -n 8 -s 1620948986 -d $mnt/ -v > /tmp/fsstress
sync
btrfs balance start -d $mnt
btrfs scrub start -B $mnt
Similar problem can be easily observed in btrfs/028 test case, there
will be tons of balance failure with -EIO.
[CAUSE]
Above fsstress will result the following data extents layout in extent
tree:
item 10 key (13631488 EXTENT_ITEM 98304) itemoff 15889 itemsize 82
refs 2 gen 7 flags DATA
extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 1339392 count 1
extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 647168 count 1
item 11 key (13631488 BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM 8388608) itemoff 15865 itemsize 24
block group used 102400 chunk_objectid 256 flags DATA
item 12 key (13733888 EXTENT_ITEM 4096) itemoff 15812 itemsize 53
refs 1 gen 7 flags DATA
extent data backref root FS_TREE objectid 259 offset 729088 count 1
Then when creating the data reloc inode, the data reloc inode will look
like this:
0 32K 64K 96K 100K 104K
|<------ Extent A ----->| |<- Ext B ->|
Then when we first try to relocate extent A, we setup the data reloc
inode with i_size 96K, then read both page [0, 64K) and page [64K, 128K).
For page 64K, since the i_size is just 96K, we fill range [96K, 128K)
with 0 and set it uptodate.
Then when we come to extent B, we update i_size to 104K, then try to read
page [64K, 128K).
Then we find the page is already uptodate, so we skip the read.
But range [96K, 128K) is filled with 0, not the real data.
Then we writeback the data reloc inode to disk, with 0 filling range
[96K, 128K), corrupting the content of extent B.
The behavior is caused by the fact that we still do full page read for
subpage case.
The bug won't really happen for regular sectorsize, as one page only
contains one sector.
[FIX]
This patch will fix the problem by invalidating range [i_size, PAGE_END]
in prealloc_file_extent_cluster().
So that if above example happens, when we preallocate the file extent
for extent B, we will clear the uptodate bits for range [96K, 128K),
allowing later relocate_one_page() to re-read the needed range.
There is a special note for the invalidating part.
Since we're not calling real btrfs_invalidatepage(), but just clearing
the subpage and page uptodate bits, we can leave a page half dirty and
half out of date.
Reading such page can cause a deadlock, as we normally expect a dirty
page to be fully uptodate.
Thus here we flush and wait the data reloc inode before doing the hacked
invalidating. This won't cause extra overhead, as we're going to
writeback the data later anyway.
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|