Searched hist:"83354 f07" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | ctree.c | 83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ctree.h | 83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | extent-tree.c | 83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
83354f07 Fri Nov 30 10:52:13 CST 2018 Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> btrfs: catch cow on deleting snapshots
When debugging some weird extent reference bug I suspected that we were
changing a snapshot while we were deleting it, which could explain my
bug. This was indeed what was happening, and this patch helped me
verify my theory. It is never correct to modify the snapshot once it's
being deleted, so mark the root when we are deleting it and make sure we
complain about it when it happens.
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|