Searched hist:"69917 e43" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | backref.h | 69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
|
| H A D | scrub.c | 69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
|
| H A D | send.c | 69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
|
| H A D | backref.c | 69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
|
| H A D | ioctl.c | 69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
69917e43 Fri Sep 07 21:01:28 CDT 2012 Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com> Btrfs: fix a bug in parsing return value in logical resolve
In logical resolve, we parse extent_from_logical()'s 'ret' as a kind of flag.
It is possible to lose our errors because
(-EXXXX & BTRFS_EXTENT_FLAG_TREE_BLOCK) is true.
I'm not sure if it is on purpose, it just looks too hacky if it is.
I'd rather use a real flag and a 'ret' to catch errors.
Acked-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liub.liubo@gmail.com>
|