Searched hist:"61 a73f5c" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/kernel/ |
| H A D | head_64.S | 61a73f5c Wed Jul 17 20:36:41 CDT 2019 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> x86/head/64: Annotate start_cpu0() as non-callable
After an objtool improvement, it complains about the fact that
start_cpu0() jumps to code which has an LRET instruction.
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xe4: unsupported instruction in callable function
Technically, start_cpu0() is callable, but it acts nothing like a
callable function. Prevent objtool from treating it like one by
removing its ELF function annotation.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6b1b4505fcb90571a55fa1b52d71fb458ca24454.1563413318.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
61a73f5c Wed Jul 17 20:36:41 CDT 2019 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> x86/head/64: Annotate start_cpu0() as non-callable
After an objtool improvement, it complains about the fact that
start_cpu0() jumps to code which has an LRET instruction.
arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: .head.text+0xe4: unsupported instruction in callable function
Technically, start_cpu0() is callable, but it acts nothing like a
callable function. Prevent objtool from treating it like one by
removing its ELF function annotation.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6b1b4505fcb90571a55fa1b52d71fb458ca24454.1563413318.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|