Searched hist:"5086 d9a9" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/net/rxrpc/ |
| H A D | proc.c | 5086d9a9 Fri Nov 11 07:47:35 CST 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets
When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 sec 3.1).
However, we may receive ACK packets in a batch and the first of these may
cut the cwnd, preventing further transmission, and each subsequent one cuts
the cwnd yet further, reducing it to the floor and killing performance.
Fix this by moving the cwnd reset to after doing the transmission and
resetting the base time such that we don't cut the cwnd by half again for
at least another RTT.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | call_event.c | 5086d9a9 Fri Nov 11 07:47:35 CST 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets
When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 sec 3.1).
However, we may receive ACK packets in a batch and the first of these may
cut the cwnd, preventing further transmission, and each subsequent one cuts
the cwnd yet further, reducing it to the floor and killing performance.
Fix this by moving the cwnd reset to after doing the transmission and
resetting the base time such that we don't cut the cwnd by half again for
at least another RTT.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | input.c | 5086d9a9 Fri Nov 11 07:47:35 CST 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets
When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 sec 3.1).
However, we may receive ACK packets in a batch and the first of these may
cut the cwnd, preventing further transmission, and each subsequent one cuts
the cwnd yet further, reducing it to the floor and killing performance.
Fix this by moving the cwnd reset to after doing the transmission and
resetting the base time such that we don't cut the cwnd by half again for
at least another RTT.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|
| H A D | ar-internal.h | 5086d9a9 Fri Nov 11 07:47:35 CST 2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets
When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 sec 3.1).
However, we may receive ACK packets in a batch and the first of these may
cut the cwnd, preventing further transmission, and each subsequent one cuts
the cwnd yet further, reducing it to the floor and killing performance.
Fix this by moving the cwnd reset to after doing the transmission and
resetting the base time such that we don't cut the cwnd by half again for
at least another RTT.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
|