History log of /openbmc/linux/net/rxrpc/proc.c (Results 1 – 25 of 99)
Revision (<<< Hide revision tags) (Show revision tags >>>) Date Author Comments
Revision tags: v6.6.25, v6.6.24, v6.6.23, v6.6.16
# 2c9dc472 02-Feb-2024 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix generation of serial numbers to skip zero

[ Upstream commit f31041417bf7f4a4df8b3bfb52cb31bbe805b934 ]

In the Rx protocol, every packet generated is marked with a per-connection
monotoni

rxrpc: Fix generation of serial numbers to skip zero

[ Upstream commit f31041417bf7f4a4df8b3bfb52cb31bbe805b934 ]

In the Rx protocol, every packet generated is marked with a per-connection
monotonically increasing serial number. This number can be referenced in
an ACK packet generated in response to an incoming packet - thereby
allowing the sender to use this for RTT determination, amongst other
things.

However, if the reference field in the ACK is zero, it doesn't refer to any
incoming packet (it could be a ping to find out if a packet got lost, for
example) - so we shouldn't generate zero serial numbers.

Fix the generation of serial numbers to retry if it comes up with a zero.

Furthermore, since the serial numbers are only ever allocated within the
I/O thread this connection is bound to, there's no need for atomics so
remove that too.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.6.15, v6.6.14, v6.6.13, v6.6.12, v6.6.11, v6.6.10, v6.6.9, v6.6.8, v6.6.7, v6.6.6, v6.6.5, v6.6.4, v6.6.3, v6.6.2, v6.5.11, v6.6.1, v6.5.10, v6.6, v6.5.9, v6.5.8, v6.5.7, v6.5.6, v6.5.5, v6.5.4, v6.5.3, v6.5.2, v6.1.51, v6.5.1, v6.1.50, v6.5, v6.1.49, v6.1.48, v6.1.46, v6.1.45, v6.1.44, v6.1.43, v6.1.42, v6.1.41, v6.1.40, v6.1.39, v6.1.38, v6.1.37, v6.1.36, v6.4, v6.1.35, v6.1.34, v6.1.33, v6.1.32, v6.1.31, v6.1.30, v6.1.29, v6.1.28, v6.1.27, v6.1.26, v6.3, v6.1.25, v6.1.24, v6.1.23, v6.1.22, v6.1.21, v6.1.20, v6.1.19, v6.1.18, v6.1.17, v6.1.16, v6.1.15, v6.1.14, v6.1.13, v6.2, v6.1.12, v6.1.11, v6.1.10, v6.1.9, v6.1.8, v6.1.7, v6.1.6, v6.1.5, v6.0.19, v6.0.18, v6.1.4, v6.1.3, v6.0.17, v6.1.2, v6.0.16, v6.1.1, v6.0.15, v6.0.14, v6.0.13, v6.1, v6.0.12, v6.0.11, v6.0.10, v5.15.80, v6.0.9, v5.15.79, v6.0.8, v5.15.78, v6.0.7, v5.15.77, v5.15.76, v6.0.6, v6.0.5, v5.15.75, v6.0.4, v6.0.3
# 5bbf9533 17-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: De-atomic call->ackr_window and call->ackr_nr_unacked

call->ackr_window doesn't need to be atomic as ACK generation and ACK
transmission are now done in the same thread, so drop the atomic64

rxrpc: De-atomic call->ackr_window and call->ackr_nr_unacked

call->ackr_window doesn't need to be atomic as ACK generation and ACK
transmission are now done in the same thread, so drop the atomic64 handling
and split it into two separate members.

Similarly, call->ackr_nr_unacked doesn't need to be atomic now either.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 9d35d880 19-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread

Move the connection setup of client calls to the I/O thread so that a whole
load of locking and barrierage can be eliminated. This necessitates

rxrpc: Move client call connection to the I/O thread

Move the connection setup of client calls to the I/O thread so that a whole
load of locking and barrierage can be eliminated. This necessitates the
app thread waiting for connection to complete before it can begin
encrypting data.

This also completes the fix for a race that exists between call connection
and call disconnection whereby the data transmission code adds the call to
the peer error distribution list after the call has been disconnected (say
by the rxrpc socket getting closed).

The fix is to complete the process of moving call connection, data
transmission and call disconnection into the I/O thread and thus forcibly
serialising them.

Note that the issue may predate the overhaul to an I/O thread model that
were included in the merge window for v6.2, but the timing is very much
changed by the change given below.

Fixes: cf37b5987508 ("rxrpc: Move DATA transmission into call processor work item")
Reported-by: syzbot+c22650d2844392afdcfd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 96b4059f 27-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Remove call->state_lock

All the setters of call->state are now in the I/O thread and thus the state
lock is now unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionn

rxrpc: Remove call->state_lock

All the setters of call->state are now in the I/O thread and thus the state
lock is now unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# a00ce28b 20-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Clean up connection abort

Clean up connection abort, using the connection state_lock to gate access
to change that state, and use an rxrpc_call_completion value to indicate
the difference bet

rxrpc: Clean up connection abort

Clean up connection abort, using the connection state_lock to gate access
to change that state, and use an rxrpc_call_completion value to indicate
the difference between local and remote aborts as these can be pasted
directly into the call state.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 5086d9a9 11-Nov-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets

When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 s

rxrpc: Move the cwnd degradation after transmitting packets

When we've gone for >1RTT without transmitting a packet, we should reduce
the ssthresh and cut the cwnd by half (as suggested in RFC2861 sec 3.1).

However, we may receive ACK packets in a batch and the first of these may
cut the cwnd, preventing further transmission, and each subsequent one cuts
the cwnd yet further, reducing it to the floor and killing performance.

Fix this by moving the cwnd reset to after doing the transmission and
resetting the base time such that we don't cut the cwnd by half again for
at least another RTT.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 32cf8edb 11-Nov-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Trace/count transmission underflows and cwnd resets

Add a tracepoint to log when a cwnd reset occurs due to lack of
transmission on a call.

Add stat counters to count transmission underflows

rxrpc: Trace/count transmission underflows and cwnd resets

Add a tracepoint to log when a cwnd reset occurs due to lack of
transmission on a call.

Add stat counters to count transmission underflows (ie. when we have tx
window space, but sendmsg doesn't manage to keep up), cwnd resets and
transmission failures.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# f3441d41 20-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Copy client call parameters into rxrpc_call earlier

Copy client call parameters into rxrpc_call earlier so that that can be
used to convey them to the connection code - which can then be offl

rxrpc: Copy client call parameters into rxrpc_call earlier

Copy client call parameters into rxrpc_call earlier so that that can be
used to convey them to the connection code - which can then be offloaded to
the I/O thread.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0.2, v5.15.74, v5.15.73, v6.0.1
# a275da62 10-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Create a per-local endpoint receive queue and I/O thread

Create a per-local receive queue to which, in a future patch, all incoming
packets will be directed and an I/O thread that will proces

rxrpc: Create a per-local endpoint receive queue and I/O thread

Create a per-local receive queue to which, in a future patch, all incoming
packets will be directed and an I/O thread that will process those packets
and perform all transmission of packets.

Destruction of the local endpoint is also moved from the local processor
work item (which will be absorbed) to the thread.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 3cec055c 25-Nov-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Don't hold a ref for connection workqueue

Currently, rxrpc gives the connection's work item a ref on the connection
when it queues it - and this is called from the timer expiration function.

rxrpc: Don't hold a ref for connection workqueue

Currently, rxrpc gives the connection's work item a ref on the connection
when it queues it - and this is called from the timer expiration function.
The problem comes when queue_work() fails (ie. the work item is already
queued): the timer routine must put the ref - but this may cause the
cleanup code to run.

This has the unfortunate effect that the cleanup code may then be run in
softirq context - which means that any spinlocks it might need to touch
have to be guarded to disable softirqs (ie. they need a "_bh" suffix).

(1) Don't give a ref to the work item.

(2) Simplify handling of service connections by adding a separate active
count so that the refcount isn't also used for this.

(3) Connection destruction for both client and service connections can
then be cleaned up by putting rxrpc_put_connection() out of line and
making a tidy progression through the destruction code (offloaded to a
workqueue if put from softirq or processor function context). The RCU
part of the cleanup then only deals with the freeing at the end.

(4) Make rxrpc_queue_conn() return immediately if it sees the active count
is -1 rather then queuing the connection.

(5) Make sure that the cleanup routine waits for the work item to
complete.

(6) Stash the rxrpc_net pointer in the conn struct so that the rcu free
routine can use it, even if the local endpoint has been freed.

Unfortunately, neither the timer nor the work item can simply get around
the problem by just using refcount_inc_not_zero() as the waits would still
have to be done, and there would still be the possibility of having to put
the ref in the expiration function.

Note the connection work item is mostly going to go away with the main
event work being transferred to the I/O thread, so the wait in (6) will
become obsolete.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 2cc80086 19-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Drop rxrpc_conn_parameters from rxrpc_connection and rxrpc_bundle

Remove the rxrpc_conn_parameters struct from the rxrpc_connection and
rxrpc_bundle structs and emplace the members directly.

rxrpc: Drop rxrpc_conn_parameters from rxrpc_connection and rxrpc_bundle

Remove the rxrpc_conn_parameters struct from the rxrpc_connection and
rxrpc_bundle structs and emplace the members directly. These are going to
get filled in from the rxrpc_call struct in future.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


Revision tags: v5.15.72
# 1fc4fa2a 03-Oct-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix congestion management

rxrpc has a problem in its congestion management in that it saves the
congestion window size (cwnd) from one call to another, but if this is 0 at
the time is saved,

rxrpc: Fix congestion management

rxrpc has a problem in its congestion management in that it saves the
congestion window size (cwnd) from one call to another, but if this is 0 at
the time is saved, then the next call may not actually manage to ever
transmit anything.

To this end:

(1) Don't save cwnd between calls, but rather reset back down to the
initial cwnd and re-enter slow-start if data transmission is idle for
more than an RTT.

(2) Preserve ssthresh instead, as that is a handy estimate of pipe
capacity. Knowing roughly when to stop slow start and enter
congestion avoidance can reduce the tendency to overshoot and drop
larger amounts of packets when probing.

In future, cwind growth also needs to be constrained when the window isn't
being filled due to being application limited.

Reported-by: Simon Wilkinson <sxw@auristor.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


Revision tags: v6.0, v5.15.71, v5.15.70, v5.15.69, v5.15.68, v5.15.67, v5.15.66, v5.15.65, v5.15.64, v5.15.63, v5.15.62, v5.15.61, v5.15.60, v5.15.59, v5.19, v5.15.58, v5.15.57, v5.15.56, v5.15.55, v5.15.54, v5.15.53, v5.15.52, v5.15.51, v5.15.50, v5.15.49, v5.15.48, v5.15.47, v5.15.46, v5.15.45, v5.15.44, v5.15.43, v5.15.42, v5.18, v5.15.41, v5.15.40, v5.15.39, v5.15.38, v5.15.37, v5.15.36, v5.15.35, v5.15.34, v5.15.33
# a4ea4c47 31-Mar-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Don't use a ring buffer for call Tx queue

Change the way the Tx queueing works to make the following ends easier to
achieve:

(1) The filling of packets, the encryption of packets and the tr

rxrpc: Don't use a ring buffer for call Tx queue

Change the way the Tx queueing works to make the following ends easier to
achieve:

(1) The filling of packets, the encryption of packets and the transmission
of packets can be handled in parallel by separate threads, rather than
rxrpc_sendmsg() allocating, filling, encrypting and transmitting each
packet before moving onto the next one.

(2) Get rid of the fixed-size ring which sets a hard limit on the number
of packets that can be retained in the ring. This allows the number
of packets to increase without having to allocate a very large ring or
having variable-sized rings.

[Note: the downside of this is that it's then less efficient to locate
a packet for retransmission as we then have to step through a list and
examine each buffer in the list.]

(3) Allow the filler/encrypter to run ahead of the transmission window.

(4) Make it easier to do zero copy UDP from the packet buffers.

(5) Make it easier to do zero copy from userspace to the packet buffers -
and thence to UDP (only if for unauthenticated connections).

To that end, the following changes are made:

(1) Use the new rxrpc_txbuf struct instead of sk_buff for keeping packets
to be transmitted in. This allows them to be placed on multiple
queues simultaneously. An sk_buff isn't really necessary as it's
never passed on to lower-level networking code.

(2) Keep the transmissable packets in a linked list on the call struct
rather than in a ring. As a consequence, the annotation buffer isn't
used either; rather a flag is set on the packet to indicate ackedness.

(3) Use the RXRPC_CALL_TX_LAST flag to indicate that the last packet to be
transmitted has been queued. Add RXRPC_CALL_TX_ALL_ACKED to indicate
that all packets up to and including the last got hard acked.

(4) Wire headers are now stored in the txbuf rather than being concocted
on the stack and they're stored immediately before the data, thereby
allowing zerocopy of a single span.

(5) Don't bother with instant-resend on transmission failure; rather,
leave it for a timer or an ACK packet to trigger.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 5d7edbc9 27-Aug-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Get rid of the Rx ring

Get rid of the Rx ring and replace it with a pair of queues instead. One
queue gets the packets that are in-sequence and are ready for processing by
recvmsg(); the oth

rxrpc: Get rid of the Rx ring

Get rid of the Rx ring and replace it with a pair of queues instead. One
queue gets the packets that are in-sequence and are ready for processing by
recvmsg(); the other queue gets the out-of-sequence packets for addition to
the first queue as the holes get filled.

The annotation ring is removed and replaced with a SACK table. The SACK
table has the bits set that correspond exactly to the sequence number of
the packet being acked. The SACK ring is copied when an ACK packet is
being assembled and rotated so that the first ACK is in byte 0.

Flow control handling is altered so that packets that are moved to the
in-sequence queue are hard-ACK'd even before they're consumed - and then
the Rx window size in the ACK packet (rsize) is shrunk down to compensate
(even going to 0 if the window is full).

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# 02a19356 05-Apr-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Define rxrpc_txbuf struct to carry data to be transmitted

Define a struct, rxrpc_txbuf, to carry data to be transmitted instead of a
socket buffer so that it can be placed onto multiple queue

rxrpc: Define rxrpc_txbuf struct to carry data to be transmitted

Define a struct, rxrpc_txbuf, to carry data to be transmitted instead of a
socket buffer so that it can be placed onto multiple queues at once. This
also allows the data buffer to be in the same allocation as the internal
data.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# f7fa5242 18-Aug-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Record stats for why the REQUEST-ACK flag is being set

Record stats for why the REQUEST-ACK flag is being set.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne

rxrpc: Record stats for why the REQUEST-ACK flag is being set

Record stats for why the REQUEST-ACK flag is being set.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# f2a676d1 11-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Record statistics about ACK types

Record statistics about the different types of ACKs that have been
transmitted and received and the number of ACKs that have been filled out
and transmitted

rxrpc: Record statistics about ACK types

Record statistics about the different types of ACKs that have been
transmitted and received and the number of ACKs that have been filled out
and transmitted or that have been skipped.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# b0154246 11-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Add stats procfile and DATA packet stats

Add a procfile, /proc/net/rxrpc/stats, to display some statistics about
what rxrpc has been doing. Writing a blank line to the stats file will
clear

rxrpc: Add stats procfile and DATA packet stats

Add a procfile, /proc/net/rxrpc/stats, to display some statistics about
what rxrpc has been doing. Writing a blank line to the stats file will
clear the increment-only counters. Allocated resource counters don't get
cleared.

Add some counters to count various things about DATA packets, including the
number created, transmitted and retransmitted and the number received, the
number of ACK-requests markings and the number of jumbo packets received.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org

show more ...


# ad25f5cb 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses read_lock() to access it. However, the timer
callback function may trigger a removal by trying to queue a call for
processing and finding that it's already queued - at which point it has a
spare refcount that it has to do something with. Unfortunately, if it puts
the call and this reduces the refcount to 0, the call will be removed from
the list. Unfortunately, since the _bh variants of the locking functions
aren't used, this can deadlock.

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.18.0-rc3-build4+ #10 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/2/25 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888107ac4038 (&rxnet->call_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: rxrpc_put_call+0x103/0x14b
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/25:
#0: ffff8881008ffdb0 ((&call->timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x23d

Changes
=======
ver #2)
- Changed to using list_next_rcu() rather than rcu_dereference() directly.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# a0575429 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Use refcount_t rather than atomic_t

Move to using refcount_t rather than atomic_t for refcounts in rxrpc.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auri

rxrpc: Use refcount_t rather than atomic_t

Move to using refcount_t rather than atomic_t for refcounts in rxrpc.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 33912c26 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Allow list of in-use local UDP endpoints to be viewed in /proc

Allow the list of in-use local UDP endpoints in the current network
namespace to be viewed in /proc.

To aid with this, the endp

rxrpc: Allow list of in-use local UDP endpoints to be viewed in /proc

Allow the list of in-use local UDP endpoints in the current network
namespace to be viewed in /proc.

To aid with this, the endpoint list is converted to an hlist and RCU-safe
manipulation is used so that the list can be read with only the RCU
read lock held.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

show more ...


# 8371666e 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a ca

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses read_lock() to access it. However, the timer
callback function may trigger a removal by trying to queue a call for
processing and finding that it's already queued - at which point it has a
spare refcount that it has to do something with. Unfortunately, if it puts
the call and this reduces the refcount to 0, the call will be removed from
the list. Unfortunately, since the _bh variants of the locking functions
aren't used, this can deadlock.

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.18.0-rc3-build4+ #10 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/2/25 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888107ac4038 (&rxnet->call_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: rxrpc_put_call+0x103/0x14b
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/25:
#0: ffff8881008ffdb0 ((&call->timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x23d

Changes
=======
ver #2)
- Changed to using list_next_rcu() rather than rcu_dereference() directly.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 8371666e 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a ca

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses read_lock() to access it. However, the timer
callback function may trigger a removal by trying to queue a call for
processing and finding that it's already queued - at which point it has a
spare refcount that it has to do something with. Unfortunately, if it puts
the call and this reduces the refcount to 0, the call will be removed from
the list. Unfortunately, since the _bh variants of the locking functions
aren't used, this can deadlock.

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.18.0-rc3-build4+ #10 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/2/25 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888107ac4038 (&rxnet->call_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: rxrpc_put_call+0x103/0x14b
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/25:
#0: ffff8881008ffdb0 ((&call->timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x23d

Changes
=======
ver #2)
- Changed to using list_next_rcu() rather than rcu_dereference() directly.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 8371666e 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a ca

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses read_lock() to access it. However, the timer
callback function may trigger a removal by trying to queue a call for
processing and finding that it's already queued - at which point it has a
spare refcount that it has to do something with. Unfortunately, if it puts
the call and this reduces the refcount to 0, the call will be removed from
the list. Unfortunately, since the _bh variants of the locking functions
aren't used, this can deadlock.

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.18.0-rc3-build4+ #10 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/2/25 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888107ac4038 (&rxnet->call_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: rxrpc_put_call+0x103/0x14b
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/25:
#0: ffff8881008ffdb0 ((&call->timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x23d

Changes
=======
ver #2)
- Changed to using list_next_rcu() rather than rcu_dereference() directly.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


# 8371666e 21-May-2022 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a ca

rxrpc: Fix locking issue

[ Upstream commit ad25f5cb39872ca14bcbe00816ae65c22fe04b89 ]

There's a locking issue with the per-netns list of calls in rxrpc. The
pieces of code that add and remove a call from the list use write_lock()
and the calls procfile uses read_lock() to access it. However, the timer
callback function may trigger a removal by trying to queue a call for
processing and finding that it's already queued - at which point it has a
spare refcount that it has to do something with. Unfortunately, if it puts
the call and this reduces the refcount to 0, the call will be removed from
the list. Unfortunately, since the _bh variants of the locking functions
aren't used, this can deadlock.

================================
WARNING: inconsistent lock state
5.18.0-rc3-build4+ #10 Not tainted
--------------------------------
inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
ksoftirqd/2/25 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
ffff888107ac4038 (&rxnet->call_lock){+.?.}-{2:2}, at: rxrpc_put_call+0x103/0x14b
{SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
...
Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0
----
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rxnet->call_lock);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by ksoftirqd/2/25:
#0: ffff8881008ffdb0 ((&call->timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x23d

Changes
=======
ver #2)
- Changed to using list_next_rcu() rather than rcu_dereference() directly.

Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

show more ...


1234